A Writer’s Garden 1: Old Thatch in the present day, part one

I came across a book The Writer’s Garden by Jackie Bennett, at work last Saturday and immediately started flicking through it to see if I could find any information about Enid Blyton’s own beloved gardens, but the book was annoyingly devoid of them. There was one reference however, where they mentioned the demolition of Green Hedges and the fact that her garden was lost, however I felt there was something missing on this one point. What about Old Thatch at Bourne End? That was a garden that Blyton took great pride in.

Anyway I thought I would add to the book with the Old Thatch gardens I know from my visits before the owners closed the garden to the public. One of my absolute favourite happy places I miss these gardens terribly and their calming atmosphere, not to mention the brilliant cake they used to provide in the tea room! Now I’m not much of a gardener, and so I’m going to show you some of the photos I have taken over the years I visited Old Thatch and hopefully give you an idea of what it was like and a few books to look at to get an idea of what it was like in Blyton’s day! Lets take a bit of a photo tour this blog and then next blog I’ll let you know what we know Blyton had her garden like.

Enjoy!

The lychgate at Old Thatch

The entrance Garden to Old Thatch through the gate.

The first part of the garden you are brought to is the court yard at the side of the house and you don’t necessarily get the full impact of the house and gardens but its so magical to step in there, its hard to stop yourself tearing around the garden at top speed.

Formal garden

Old Thatch front window

 

There are so many pictures of Old Thatch, I wish I could show you them all but that would be impossible right now. Next week I’ll have a look at what we can find out about what the garden was like in Blyton’s day.  Follow the Tags “Bourne End” and “Old Thatch” for more blogs and pictures about this amazing place.

Posted in Enid Blyton | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

When people search for Enid Blyton what are they looking for? (#2)

A long time ago I did a post about the search terms which brought people to our site, (I also had some in a Monday post, with made-up illustrations) and while looking for things to write about for my maternity leave posts I noticed a few funny ones and thought I could do a second post.

It’s interesting to see what weird and wonderful things people put into search engines. I’m sure many will have come to our site and found something interesting or useful, others will be very disappointed as we have no information on spiders called Enid.


I DON’T THINK YOU ARE IN THE RIGHT PLACE

Like the enid-the-spider searcher, some people will be disappointed to find our blog after searching for things like second form at malory towers read online freeSorry, but no. We don’t illegally publish whole books that are still under copyright. (A few long out of print poems are another matter.)

A lot of people clearly want that though, and think it’s OK, as I’ve noticed a few more results for ‘book title read online’.  Read Nooddy books online being one, which is worse because of the terrible spelling. But it’s not as bad as Secert Seven Win Thorgh book dwolond. You have to give Google points for working out what this person meant!

Famous Five pdf books4you.blog.com is wrong twice. We don’t do illegal PDFs and strangely we are not called books4you.

One or two baffled me, like Hilary Mckay. On searching I’ve found out she’s a children’s author published by Hodder, but we’ve never written anything about her!

Scarlet pimpernel is another. I suspect the words come up in one of our monthly flowers posts, but I imagine many people would think of the famous novel first!

Eileen A Soper who was David Morton is also interesting, as I can’t think of any connection between the two. We certainly mention both of them on this site, but not usually in the same sentence (until now.) There is also a second entry of Eileen A Soper and David MortonThe same person, I wonder, or is there a common confusion out there?

09cc1508c43a7ad5550e1acfd2cf2035

Months that ended on a Monday in 2015Nope, we are not a calendar.

g.r. no. 197980. I don’t have a clue.


I STARTED TYPING AND THEN I…

Some people like to live dangerously and not finish their searches:

The first modern observation of the… Of the what? (And how did that lead them to us?)

The name of the charecter five run away together. What character would that be? Sorry, charecter.

Eileen Soper boyEileen Soper illustrated many boys. Was there a particular one you were interested in?

What species dog in enid blytonMany? Well, in her books. Not necessarily inside Enid herself.


FANFICTION REQUESTS

There were a lot of searches for Enid Blyton fan fiction. Many were straight foward like famous five fan fiction. Others were very, very specific. Perhaps the person had once read a fan fiction and forgotten its name, but I can’t believe that’s the case every time.

  • Five Find Outers fanfiction Fatty hurt
  • Fanfiction Enid Blyton Anne gets kidnaped
  • Julian kiss George Enid Blyton fanfic – you do know they are cousins, right??
  • “Julian” “George” “kiss” “fanfiction” – this person is determined!
  • Enid Blyton fanfiction about Barney and Diana’s romance

annegetskidnapped


ARE YOU CHEATING BY ANY CHANCE?

Just like last time there are a lot of people looking for summaries and synopses of books. We’ve even got one for a critical appreciation of a title. Fair enough, but how many of them are meant to be writing their own? Many also want summary by chapter or quite in depth things – why not just read the book?

I suspect this person could be: write a character sketch of any of the main character of Enid Blyton. That looks like they’ve bunged their homework assignment (perhaps they’ve specified their author of choice as I’m not sure how many schools specifically assign Blyton) straight into Google looking for answers.

But then again maybe it’s teachers looking for inspiration – this sounds like a teacher doesn’t it? Enidblyton poems for class one (apart from the missing space, but even teachers can make typos.)

What do the Famous Five book Five Get Into Trouble talk about and illustrations opinion. Not too sure what this means but again, reading the book would probably help.

My favourite character in and why I like it Five on a Hike Together. How is Google supposed to know who your favourite character is and why you like that book?

Or how about Enid Blyton french verbsDo your own French homework! (Ok they may be looking for any examples given in either Mam’zelles class.)

Why we inspired by Enid BlytonI don’t think Google can answer that for you either.

And Famous Five Go to Billycock Hill powerpoint presentation… make your own!


BOOKS THAT WERE NEVER PUBLISHED

Malory Towers Fourth Grade when the school was temporarily relocated to the US and the girls studied math and ate gum.

Five at the George summary. I’m torn as to whether they mean George or not. Gorge would make more sense, even if the Five never did go to a gorge.


AND THE DEEP AND MEANINGFUL

Why has Noddy changed? One searcher asked. I imagine this typed in a very mournful way, lamenting the fact that Noddy is now a CGI boy with a tablet computer. Why indeed, has Noddy changed?

Why did Enid Blyton Five Find Outers Bets ageOh why did Bets have to age? Or do they mean why was she younger? Both very important queries.

Was Five Go Mad in Dorset racist -wikipedia -wikia – a good question, really! (And they were smart to exclude Wikipedia from their search.)

 

noddy-toyland-detective


I think that’s enough for one week. I have more for later, though!

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , , , , , | 7 Comments

Monday #233

Ok, it really shows when Fiona’s not around. I know, I failed to do the August round up, so it’s down for this weekend as well! Please forgive me! Anyway, this is what we have coming up this week. Enjoy!

wedfrisun6767

 

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Blyton for Grown Ups: A Man of Some Repute by Elizabeth Edmondson

A-Man-of-SR-400-200x300

I read this book a long time ago, but realised this week that it was pretty much exactly the kind of book we’re looking for for this blog and decided that a recap on my part and a blog wouldn’t be too much of a bad thing. Apologies if my details are a bit off, it’s been about  year, but it made such an impression I knew I needed to let you know all about it.


A very English mystery


The series title says it all really: this basically is just a mystery based on everything England is famous for, based in the 1950s. The feel of it is a world recovering after the second world war, while being embroiled in a good old fashioned English mystery.

The suave Hugo Hawksworth is like an Agatha Christie sleuth, Enid Blyton grown up Julian Kirrin, Dorothy L Sayers Lord Peter Wimsey all rolled into one. Hugo Hawksworth is an intelligence officer who’s been sent on a different kind of mission. I think he was injured somewhat, there’s a lot of references about his leg, which I think is the problem, so this little job at Selchester Castle is supposed to be just a nice little ‘office’ job to while away the time.

Selchester however had the tragedy of losing its earl seven years earlier and his only daughter can’t wait to be able to declare her father dead so she can sell up and move on from the family home. Her cousin however, Freya Wryton, feels more of a connection to the family home and hopes her uncle will one day return.

When a skeleton turns up in the church it all changes and maybe Lady Sonia won’t need to get her father declared legally dead after all – because he really seems to be. Hugo and Freya join teams in an unlikely fashion to try and solve the mystery of the skeleton and what happened to the Earl on that fateful night seven years previously.

It really is a thrilling read.


Grown up Blyton – Are you sure?


I couldn’t be surer about this one. I love the period of history it’s set in, I love the feel of the cosy crime mystery and the proper language, the lack of technology and the manners of everyone. I really adore this time period and Elizabeth Edmondson really makes you feel the time – you feel the fifties from top to bottom. The mystery itself is totally Agatha Christie based and logical like Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes but in a sort of Enid Blyton Fatty/ Julian/ Philip /Jack kind of wrapper.

More genteel than Marina Pascoe’s Barlett and Boase mysteries, and more 1950s than the crime noir of Sara Sheridan’s Mirabelle Bevan, A Man of Some Repute is for those who want a grown up mystery with the nostaglic feel of the childhood heroes they read about who solved wonderful cases and had wonderful adventures. The good part about A Man of Some Repute is that it has that Blytonian feel to it, the more sedate, case working, brain picking, clue finding mixture that makes Blyton a joy to read.

I don’t think I could recommend this book enough. Even now, after so long I can thoroughly enjoy the book because it’s high quality. Edmondson makes a fantastic feeling in this book and carries you along. I can’t wait to re-read and read the subsequent books.

Please do try this book, I promise you, you won’t be disappointed!

Let me know what you think in the comments!

Posted in Book reviews, Other Authors, Reading Recommendations | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Adventure Series on TV: The Castle of Adventure, part 8

Unusually we are not resuming after a cliff-hanger. Instead we have had time to swallow the reveal that Sam, dodgy pedlar of ‘farm-fresh’ eggs, and eater of snacks uninvited, has actually been Scar all along.


LUCY-ANN’S SHOCK

While we’re all surprised at Sam being Scar, Lucy-Ann is simply shocked that Scar is Sam. Dinah whispers this to her, so that they aren’t overheard. But idiotic Lucy-Ann immediately shrieks SAM so that he comes over and opens the curtains on the bed. Where’s the others? he asks right away.

Now we’ve seen Sam behaving pretty threateningly but he really ramps it up as Scar. Holding up a very large gun he says we’ll deal with them later. Though it’s a bit James Bond bad guy-esque, if they intend to leave the girls alone for a while before ‘dealing with them’.


ELSEWHERE THE WORLD’S A VIDEO GAME

At the military compound soldiers are running everywhere as an alarm goes off. Grogan’s only watching but it looks like a video game where you’d have to get inside without being seen.

Even more like a game (perhaps along the lines of the original Tomb Raider etc) Tassie leads Jack down the tunnel (so large you wonder how on earth they missed it from either end before). Anyway, for no reason a load of barrels and boxes fall after they’ve passed. In a game this would give you the challenge of a) staying ahead of the avalanche and b) stopping you going back on yourself. On TV though, they’re fairly oblivious until they dodge a few barrels at the end of the tunnel. As soon as they’re clear of the tunnel exit the game, sorry, script caused a huge boulder to fall and completely block it off.

We then move onto a game more inline with Street Fighter (or my favourite – Streets of Rage!) where Jack and Tassie are pounced on and driven to the floor by a couple of balaclava clad men. Before I/they get carried away they do realise quickly that they’re only a couple of kids and luckily Bill’s right there to ensure their safety a moment later.


EXCUSES, EXCUSES

Now it’s time for Bill and his men to get into the castle for the big rescue and capturing of the bad guys.

Of course, Button’s tunnel is conveniently blocked. (In the book it’s a narrow pipe/stream and the kids can barely squeeze through so it’s of no good for the adults). There is a door, but like in the book it’s locked.

He doesn’t even mention the plank. Of course the plank is gone, but I’m sure with the might of the MOD behind them a plank of some kind could be rustled up rather quickly. Again, in the book the plank/window would be no use as it’s one of those tall narrow slit windows that the children can only just squeeze through. Bill and his burly men stood no chance. On TV the window’s a decent size (Philip’s a decent sized teenager and he makes it through) and I’m sure they’d manage. It just seems daft to have changed two elements of the story that would have given the men access and then to have to hurriedly block/ignore them.

So to get inside they blast the lock off the door with a machine gun. In the book it’s done fairly quietly with a blow torch type thing. Goodness knows why that had to change – and considering they sneak around cautiously once inside it seems very foolish to have announced their arrival with gunfire!

 

Then again their discretion also spoiled a bit by Jack’s bright yellow sleeves!


BACK TO SAM/SCAR

I feel the need to add that Sam, as Scar (which I assume is his real identity), loses his amiable country burr. He still had it when he threatened Tassie and Rose all those times so it’s odd to hear him suddenly speaking in a different voice. He’s also a lot quieter which adds to the menace (he does shout a bit but he doesn’t constantly boom). Somehow the fact that our earlier meeting with Scar saw him whisper the whole time made it the more surprising that Sam and Scar are one and the same.

Continue reading

Posted in Blyton on TV | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Monday #232

It’s that time of the month again when we look at what we’ve been blogging about this month. You’ve got me doing it this time because of course, Fiona has her hands full! Hope you like the look of the blogs this week!

Monday#232

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Mystery of the Vanished Prince

the-mystery-of-the-vanished-prince.jpgIf you asked me ‘Do I want to read this book?’ my honest answer would be another question; ‘how much do you like Enid Blyton?’ because that is basically the reason I sat down and read this book. If it was by anyone else, I would have just not finished it. Let me explain why.

The issues

How do I put this nicely? Who in Peterswood isn’t an idiot? Constable Goon is an idiot, Fatty is an idiot, all the grown ups seem to be idiots, Pip, Larry, Daisy and Bets seem to be idiots. It’s just ridiculous.

Fatty dresses the others up as foreign nationals from Tetura because there is a prince from there staying at a local campsite. Ern Goon, along with twin brothers Perce and Sid are staying in the adjoining campsite, and are completely taken in by Pip, Bets, Larry and Daisy dressed up like the prince. Bets pretends to be the Princess of Tetura and takes Ern and fools the others completely.

It even takes Mr Goon in, and he reports the Princess’ appearance to Inspector Jenks when the news about the prince vanishing breaks. Fatty then has to come clean to Jenks about the trick and, for once, gets a super ticking off from the inspector who doesn’t think its a good thing for him to have done and wants him to apologise to Goon, and promise that if they hear anything about the vanishing prince to let Goon know.

Fatty and the others apologise, and Goon just pooh-poohs the idea of them helping and won’t even listen to their findings. I mean that’s just stupid, he lets his opinion of the Find-Outers rule his common sense and treats their information with disdain. To be completely honest I’m not sure how he hasn’t already lost his job, because he’s so bad at it. It really makes a mockery of the whole police system in a way because Goon is being shown up by a bunch of children, now no one wants that. At least with the Famous Five, they stumbled on to mysteries and then once the police got involved they were no longer allowed on the scene and they were always perfectly respectful to members of the law and quite rightly so. The Find-Outers don’t seem to have that respect for anyone who isn’t inspector Jenks, which doesn’t send a good message to those reading the books.

One of the other issues with this book is that it takes so long to get to the mystery – AGAIN. This must be the third book or so where things haven’t really kicked off until the second half of the book and it contains so much clutching at straws its hard to believe. Nothing really makes this mystery go until the children manage to get some sense out of Sid Goon, whose mouth has suddenly become unstuck from all the toffee he’s been eating and he admits to having seen something in one of the families caravanning next door to the Goon’s camp.

My last complaint is that it happens all in the last couple of chapters. Goon gets shown up, even though had he listened to Fatty, he wouldn’t have a problem, and the children once again rescue the prince and save the day and the inspector isn’t the least bit mad at them for that. I mean yes, they helped, but still they wasted police time at the beginning of the mystery. Honestly, I don’t think I can take much more of the ‘Oh you children and Buster are all so great. Frederick please grow up quicker so I can have you on my team’ mantra. Frankly my dear inspector, if you were any good at your job you’d have figured it all out and fired Goon.

Phew, ok, rant mostly over.

The good parts

When the story actually gets moving the clues start pouring in, the mystery isn’t actually a bad one. It’s a style which Blyton hasn’t really used before, but can been seen in some of her contemporaries’ work, such as Agatha Christie, who uses classic misdirection in many of her stories. It’s a nice way to turn a mystery that really didn’t have anything going for it into a credible finisher. Fatty of course has to come out trumps as usual, but that aside, the rest of the Find-Outers do put their money’s worth in to help the situation.

The arrival of Ern is not nearly quite as bad as the first book he was in, he seems to have grown up and matured a bit, even though he is still a bit of a nit, but then he’s refreshing to have instead of Fatty. So it’s nice to have him around.

Pip really blows the mystery wide open by finding a clue that Fatty dismissed as clue in the first place, the button from the prince’s pyjamas. So I’m a fan of Pip this time around.

Anyway, it’s hard to feel the good in this one, I really didn’t get on with it. Let me know what you think in the comments!

Next review: The Mystery of the Strange Bundle

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

How to get Blyton’s style: Baby edition

I happened to be in Mothercare last week, looking at prams, and I spotted this lovely Noddy set. I managed to resist buying it (just) but I suspect one way or another I will end up with it*. The best part is that it’s using vintage Noddy images!

Noddy 3-piece set, £15 at Mothercare.

It made me wonder what other Blyton stuff was out there for little ones. Here’s what I found.


SOFT TOYS

With the new Noddy series on Channel 5 now there is some merchandise to go with it, including these soft toys.

A few of the toys are unrecognisable to those who haven’t seen the show as they were specially created for it but Noddy and Bumpy Dog are there. Noddy is quite modernised in his beanie hat so I’m not sure I would go for it.

Noddy 8 inch plus assortment, currently £3.99 (normally £7.99), Argos.

Saying that, this vintage Noddy is rather scary looking so maybe older isn’t better? (It’s also 7.5x the price!)

 

Unique Vintage Play By Play Noddy Soft Toy, £30 on Etsy.


AND OTHER TOYS

Vintage jigsaws and other bits and pieces turn up fairly often, but the question is whether or not you would spend £10 plus postage on a 1960s jigsaw and then let a toddler loose with it.

 

Boxed Vintage 1967 Enid Blyton Noddy and Big Ears, £10 on Etsy.

The Entertainer has some new Noddy toys as well, the Big-Ears figure and Bumpy Dog looks quite nice.

entertainertoys

Noddy toys, from £5 at The Entertainer.

Toys R Us has a slightly different selection including – ugh – walkie talkies and Noddy’s Tablet.

toysrusnoddy

Noddy toys, from £7.49 (while the half-term sale is on), at Toys R Us.


IF YOUR BABY IS 8 YEARS OLD (AND POSSIBLY FRENCH)…

…there is a jumper on Amazon for you.

noddy-jumper

Also available in red, but not in any other sizes.

Noddy Blue Sweater, £16.05 from Amazon


IF YOU ARE  A KNITTER

You could knit your own Noddy jumper with this pattern, the bonus being it could be any colour and presumably any size. The downside may be it ending up knee length or with three arms.

noddyknitting
Noddy Children’s Jumper Knitting Pattern (a4 reproduction, child not included), £1.69 on Etsy


IF THE JUMPER WENT WELL, YOU COULD TRY THIS:

There’s also a pattern for a knitted Noddy doll, if your jumper had the right number of arms.

noddyknitteddoll

This looks much more like Noddy should, even if you do have to make him yourself (or persuade a mum or granny to help) to achieve it.

Noddy Knitting Pattern (instant download) £1.19 on Etsy (though confusingly the title has 99p in it!)

And there’s also this pattern book which has several jumpers, a cardigan and toys:

knittingpatterns

Noddy Knitting Pattern Book (the original copy), £30 on Etsy.

I love the design on the back of the cardigan, and that they shot the pictures at Beksonscot!


IF MAKE YOUR OWN IS NOT YOUR THING…

There’s this handmade Noddy dress, knickers and bow. (I’m having a boy, so this is a no-go for me unfortunately – and I’m a lousy knitter/seamstress).

noddy-dress

Knickers and headband, £15.00 on Etsy

Dress, from £20 on Etsy

Headband, £6.50 on Etsy – and this one goes up to adult sizes! 

So I may not be able to buy the dress now, but maybe I should get myself the headband?


NODDY BUT NOT NODDY

This tshirt – and the baby grow – is clearly inspired by Noddy – the listing describes it as a Toyland Elf tshirt inspired by their favourite children’s books. It comes up when you search for Noddy, though! Maybe they just don’t want to be sued for copyright infringement.

Toyland Elf Tshirt, £8.99 on Etsy.

Toyland Elf Babygrow, £8.99 on Etsy.


FINALLY SOMETHING THAT IS NOT NODDY

Unsurprisingly pretty much everything is Noddy-related as Noddy has had multiple TV adaptations and that has resulted in a lot of merchandise through the years.

Saying that, there is a (slightly creepy) felted Moonface Doll. Which is probably entirely unsuitable for anyone under five.

moonface-doll

Moonface doll Enid Blyton characters felted moonface faraway tree dolls magic moonface worry doll sleep guardian pocket moon face elf kendal, £18 on Etsy. And yes that is one of the worst product titles I have seen recently.

A bit nicer looking are these Saucepan Man and Silky felted dolls.


So there you go, some ideas on what you can get for your little ones, apart from the books themselves! (And of course the new ones are so bowdlerised they’re no good, but that means allowing small grubby hands on vintage texts… that’s a debate for another day!!)
*Spoiler alert, I did buy it!

 

Posted in Vintage Style | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Monday #231

I am happy to report that Fiona and baby Brodie are doing well, even if Brodie doesn’t seem to understand sleeping very well.  Here’s sending soothing wishes to Mum and baby so they both get some rest!

Hope you like the blogs coming this week!

Monday#231

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Mystery of the Invisible Thief 

The Mystery of the Invisible Thief by Enid Blyton. The title sort of says it all, doesn’t it? It promises the mystery and the intrigue of a thief who cannot be seen or caught, and it suggests a promise of a really hard brain teaser, and if you’re a child, it is probably not obvious who the thief is, so it’s a brilliant adventure. For me? Oh please! Let me explain.

invisiblethief

Boy oh boy! All about Fatty… again

Frederick Algernon Trotterville aka Fatty, I just cannot like him. Not that I agree entirely with Constable Goon, but Fatty is a right pain. There seems to be nothing he can’t do, no problem he can’t solve and yes, he may have brains, but he’s an odious character.  Defintitely a Marty Stu without a shadow of a doubt. In Blyton’s eyes and pen, he can do nothing wrong, not even when he is being a teenage boy who really needs a good box around the ears. He’s cheeky, rude, disrespectful and just a boastful mess! I do not know why people like him that much, he is not clever.

All right, that’s going a bit far, he is clever, but he’s a bit dumb as well. He can have brainwaves such as in The Mystery of the Pantomime Cat where he figures out who was actually the robber. This mystery however, his brains have gone because quite frankly, from the first introduction of the baddie, I knew, I just knew it was them. Blyton does this thing where she makes the character deliberately annoying, pompous or just unlikeable so you know he’s the bad guy. One of the other tells she uses is that animals don’t tend to like the bad character and react that way, however this isn’t really apparent in The Mystery of the Invisible Thief as Buster seems to be left behind quite a bit because all Fatty seems to do is dress up. To top it all off as well, the dressing up doesn’t get him any further than it would have done if he’d been detecting in normal clothes, apart from when he helps with Colonel Cross’ weeding in exchange for the Colonels pair of size 12 boots.  I think that is the only point in the book where I can say the dressing up did some good, the rest of the time it was just to show that he could. From those dressing up adventures he learnt nothing, or very little at the most.

I really wish these books would move away from the ‘Fatty’s so amazing’ mantra, I promise you, its getting old.

The actual mystery

So moving on, and trying to ignore the Fatty-centric tone of the book, the mystery could have been quite complex, and for children I think it was. However, as I said earlier, I managed to spot the robber from the first scene. When you know Blyton, and know what the format is, it’s quite easy to work it out. I won’t tell you who it is, because I would like to see if you can work it out yourself, but let’s say its quite simple.

The method the invisible thief uses as well is very very simple. I know sometimes the simple methods of committing a crime work well in books because people expect things to be difficult and complex whereas simple works just as well and efficiently. Agatha Christie certainly proves that enough times.

The term invisible is a loose in this context. The children believe that invisible means that someone completely isn’t there and vanishes into thin air. However for someone who is well versed in crime novels, and historical novels, the term invisible can be used to describe someone like a tradesman who you just don’t take any notice of. It’s a play on the word really because it leads you to one idea but then presents you another solution.

There isn’t actually much action to this mystery, no real trailing, or suspects, or anything like The Mystery of the Hidden House for example, but there is just a lot of Goon baiting, which gets tiresome. We have a lot of exploration of boots, and people in the village with large feet aka Mr Goon and Colonel Cross but no leads, no information and no action.

The absolute best bit is when Pip plays a trick on the others which causes Fatty to solve the mystery which I could have done in half the time – and this is supposed to be a bright boy? That’s one for you guys to figure out.

Conclusion

I had high hopes after the Pantomine Cat mystery but they were not fulfilled by Invisible Thief, in fact it was severely disappointing. It was a “look how wonderful Fatty is” novel, with a bit of Goon baiting thrown in. There isn’t enough real showing of the other characters and even Bets doesn’t shine through like she usually does. Its just a bland mystery for me.

Anyway, let me know what you think in the comments below!

Next review: The Mystery of the Vanished Prince

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , | 6 Comments

The Adventure Series on TV: The Castle of Adventure part 7

We left last week on a cliff-hanger again. Dinah, Lucy-Ann and Philip (inside a suit of armour) were down in the cellar/dungeon and shut themselves in. Then someone opened the trap-door and came down to join them. But is it Jack, or is it one of the spies?

I’d guess one of the spies, as that way it fits with the book and would cause the spies to keep the girls prisoner while Philip has to keep his presence a secret.

So shall we see who it is?


IT’S A PAIR OF PIRATES

Well, not really. It’s our spies (named Nico and Mannheim I’ve just noticed), but Dinah immediately blurts out that she and Lucy-Ann won’t tell anyone about their pirate radio station. I think she’s pretending that’s what they believe, but it’s a bit hard to tell. She certainly doesn’t trust them as she cuts off the idiotic Lucy-Ann when she’s about to mention Jack.

The girls wait until they are distracted, leg it and the spies manage to both fall over the same chair? Stupidly the men have a) left the trap door open, and b) don’t think to pull the lever to close it before the girls can get out.

The girls aren’t much smarter. They don’t think to slow the men down by shutting the doors from the outside, and Lucy-Ann screams a lot as they run. They’re lucky there are not other spies around as they make themselves a real target!

Dinah impresses a little more by grabbing some large, handy rocks and pelting the men with them (she has great aim!) but when they reach their access window they discover the plank is gone!

They are therefore caught and weirdly Dinah shouts “where’s our plank?” more than she does “let us go.”


RANDOM PADDING

Two men dressed in black, with balaclavas and black face-paint are fighting in the woods… from the identical outfits you have to assume they’re actually on the same side? And then a phone rings. Bill and an army sergeant are observing the fight.

Then Bill and Aunt Jane drive down the same road approaching each other. Neither makes any effort to pull to the side so there’s a bit of a stalemate and horn honking. But it’s all right as she then recognises him and shouts “Bill Cunningham, you male chauvinist.” She forgives him when he reverses and invites him over. (He was already invited to Spring Cottage so none of that was at all necessary!)


NIGHT-TIME ESCAPADES IN THE CASTLE

Buttons appears in the castle in the middle of the night and Jack attaches a note to his collar to get Tassie’s help.

Grogan – Allie’s American friend turns up again and is more threatening towards the girls. He reveals that Scar (Scar-neck in the book) is coming tonight.

All three men walk right past Philip but don’t notice his hand holding the visor open.

One climbs Jack’s ladder again but is scared off by the eagle flapping its wings on the nest. The eagle must like Jack better…

Philip exits the suit of armour, revealing it is a hollow front and not a full suit, but it’s still noisy getting out of it. He then follows the American friend down a secret passage leading (presumably) out of the castle. He leaves the girls behind because “If they find you’re gone, they’ll know which way.” Not really, they could have opened the trap door and gone out and hidden elsewhere in the castle.


BILL AND JANE, TASSIE AND ROSE

Bill finally visits Spring Cottage. He has a weird moment when Jane reminds him that Philip’s father loved nature too and Bill says “Yes, I remember” in a very deep and meaningful way. I’m not sure quite that I’m meant to infer from that, if anything.

Button returns to Tassie’s caravan. Who’s sent you a letter? You can’t read, says Tassie’s mother (Rose), snatching the note from her. She’s furious when she reads the note and says your fancy friends are at the castle, but won’t reveal the rest, just shouts at Tassie for getting involved. Tassie lruns away just as Sam arrives.

Sam’s look is so threatening that Rose rushes off after Tassie. (Bearing in mind this is well after dark). None of this is dramatic enough, clearly, so Tassie has to fall over a bit as well.

Jane reveals the children are at the castle just as Bill goes to leave and the thunder and lightening starts.

Tassie follows Button in, emerging at the end of what looks like a large tunnel (very similar to where Grogan exited earlier). She claims she came in by an underground stream when she meets Jack to plan a rescue.


AND HERE BE SPOILERS!

Sam turns up in the cellar and reveals he got in with keys. Niko says that Scar won’t be happy about all this. And then… Sam removes his neckerchief to reveal…  A SCAR.

So not a cliffhanger this week, but a major reveal!


We’re really getting somewhere now! The final episode will hopefully have a thunderstorm and an exciting escape. It’s just a shame that there are so many padded out earlier episodes and then the ‘kidnapped’ section is so short as a result.

Also disappointing is the consistent ‘comic’ villainy shown by Nico and Mannheim.

Nico – “Ask them about the boys. I saw them in the woods with some boys. Oh, and they had a parrot.”

Grogan “Where?”

“Here, on his shoulder. Like that bloke, you know, pieces of eight, pieces of eight…” (While doing a jig and a parrot-type squawk).

It’s just so annoying!

Posted in Blyton on TV | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Monday #230

Well, we have another Monday in our midst, and it’s got some good news attached to it. Fiona has had her baby boy!! Brodie was born last Sunday, and is now over a week old, and he is GORGEOUS!! Auntie Stef is desperate to get up there for cuddles! So I hope you’ll join in congratulating Fiona and her other half on their new arrival! Look how gorgeous he is in his Noddy sleep suit.

20170813BrodieCampbell

1 Week old and already a Blyton and Beatrix Potter Fan! 

Now, for the more boring part – this week’s blogs!

Monday#230

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Blyton for Grown Ups: Too Many Cooks by Marina Pascoe

Continuing my theme of let’s see what books we could read as adults if we wanted a break from Blyton, I have decided to look at Too Many Cooks by Marina Pascoe. This is the second book in the series of Bartlett and Boase Mysteries but I decided to review it because I have recently finished reading it (well listening to it) and I can’t quite remember all the twists and turns of the first book in the series. So shall we take a look?

bartlettandboaseBartlett and Boase

Set in post world war one, we’re in slightly different time zone than Enid Blyton’s mysteries, which are set more in the post world war two period but the detective methods are similar and Bartlett and Boase have all the characteristics to unravel a mystery that the children do. The lack of ‘scientific’ research at their fingertips allows me to draw comparisons between the two authors and the different series.

George Bartlett is a inspector, moved down from London for the good of his wife, Caroline’s, health and runs the small Falmouth constabulary alongside his trusty local boy, Archibald Boase. Between them they make a formidable team, even though they are very different. Bartlett thinks of Boase as a substitute son to the one he lost in France during the war and the two rub along well. Boase is included in the Bartlett family life quite a bit by this novel because he is stepping out with Bartlett’s daughter Irene. Together life in Falmouth is supposed to be a bit of an easy ride for hard working Bartlett, after London life, but it doesn’t turn out that way.

George Bartlett is an easy to like character, devoted to his wife daughter Irene, and faithful hound Topper, he muddles through a lot of Falmouth life, with a rough London edge to him. In most novels this would have made him an outsider to the locals but he seems to fit in alright, and everyone, apart from his superintendent, like and respect him.

Archie Boase is a young man, living in rooms in Falmouth with an appetite to rival that of the Famous Five – he always seems to be eating pork pies!- and is eager to impress and get on with everyone. He’s a fine copper, and has a good knack at seeing things from a different perspective. Boase works well, and respects his superior, Bartlett, usually bowing to his superior knowledge but at the same time he’s not afraid to speak his own mind. Never a bad thing in such a close knit dynamic.

About the Story

So now I’ve given you an idea of Bartlett and Boase as characters, maybe it’s best to look at the story now, and see if I can get you interested in them.

The mysteries that I’ve read (Empty Vessels and Too Many Cooks) turn into great rambling, difficult to solve mysteries. There are curve balls thrown at every chance and  there are so many twists and turns I really have to be paying attention to what I’m listening to to be able to understand how someone got from A to C without passing B, as it were.

My best advice about Bartlett and Boase is, forget Agatha Christie, forget G.K Chesterton, and anyone similar. What you have here with Bartlett and Boase are two policemen, doing their job and having difficult circumstances, but they have human nature in the way. Especially when it comes to Too Many Cooks because there is so much deceit that goes on with one of the characters because she’s worried about the consequences that will catch up with her. If you learn anything from this book, its that self-preservation always gets in the way.

Too Many Cooks is a murder story, there is definitely no way around it, because of the nature of the kill(s). I won’t go into too many details but a body is found and there’s a young women who always seems to draw Bartlett and Boase’s attention and something never really feels quite right with her. Between the detectives doing their best to figure out a murder, find a missing man, and chase this strange girl who seems to be everywhere they turn, your head is so full of information that its hard to know which way to turn.

I cannot fault the writing, quite frankly, because it takes a skilled writer to be able to work with so many threads in a plot and bring them all together successfully, which Pascoe does manage to do…well almost. I did feel a bit jilted at the ending because it wasn’t the resolution I would have liked, but I think that actually adds to the book and the realness of the story. Things don’t always work out nicely which is…ok and because we’re reading adult books now, we can’t expect the nice happy endings that Blyton would give us. I know that is one of the reasons we still do read Blyton, but hey you might still enjoy Bartlett and Boase.

Set against the backdrop of the port town of Falmouth, where author Marina Pascoe actually lives, the atmospheric descriptions of the place are well worth a read. Pascoe also manages to convey that the police investigation takes a lot of time, and leads and information can be slow. I think sometimes you lose this in a more fast paced novel, but that does not make it any less absorbing. With cultural additions, such as Egyptology rearing its head and having a large part to play in the story, and things such as dances and clothing being so accurately described and portrayed you really feel as if you are back in 1920s Falmouth. Always a good mark of a proper expert.

Why read it?

I realise I may not have entirely sold you this book, but I can promise you, it will keep you hooked and desperate for more. The twists, turns and amazing things that come out of them are worthy of Blyton and Christie. You should really give these books a go, even if you’ve been put off by my review. Smooth reading, with a wonderfully vibrant 1920s backdrop.

Let me know your thoughts below!

Posted in Book reviews, Other Authors, Reading Recommendations | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

The Zoo Book, part 5

The final four chapters now!


CHAPTER THIRTEEN: ARMOURED ANIMALS

The hedgehog (aka the hedge-pig) get a page and a half to introduce us to armoured animal. I’m not sure the humble hedgehog is really zoo exhibit material but it gives Blyton a chance to show off her knowledge of British wild-life.

  • The porcupine, despite the looks, is not a cousin of the hedgehog but rather is a rodent. The name means spiny pig. Blyton says perhaps you have seen penholders or toothpicks made of porcupine quills. Probably not that likely these days.
  • The armadillo
  • The tortoise and the turtle are both reptiles, and very similar so get lumped together here. They’re cold blooded, lay eggs, are slow and lazy, fond of sleeping and live to be a great age. Tortoise not a good pet as they eat what they shouldn’t (I assume she means flowers etc) and disappear easily. Only then does she say that turtles rarely leave the sea and have flippers instead of stumpy legs (I have seen an awful lot of people get turtles and tortoises mixed up, this sort of thing doesn’t help!). The hawkbill turtle has a shell which when polished and made into ‘tortoiseshell’ brushes and combs, is very beautiful. Probably more beautiful left on the animal though!
  • Crocodiles and alligators, another pair of similar animals that people confuse. Blyton tells us where we can find them and describes them as slow and clumsy on land… but I think they can get up a reasonable speed, or have I watched too many SyFy movies? I don’t think they can keep it up for very long but I’m sure they can run. Their anatomies (and differences) are covered – apparently the alligator gets the will eat human beings if it can get them, but the same isn’t said for the crocodile, but both are not pleasant creatures. I was interested to read that neither has a tongue, I’m not sure I knew that. I have since looked that up and it’s not true! The crocodile has a tongue that doesn’t move, and isn’t used for feeding but for protecting the airway, while the alligator has a regular tongue used for moving food in the mouth.

Interestingly the below anecdote is then included:

Once a traveller killed a crocodile and cut it open, and what do you think he found inside it? Here are some of the things, and they will show you what a man-eating monster it must have been: eleven heavy brass arm rings, three wire amulets, one bead necklace, fourteen arm and leg bones of various animals, eighteen stones, and some porcupine quills! This is difficult to believe, but it is quite true. 

How I wish I knew her source for that story! I have a hard time believing it.

  • Ant-eaters are cousins of the armadillo. Pangolin is the proper name (ant-eater is a generic term which  applies to the aardvark, numbat and echidnas too.) “The great ant-eater” is mentioned, and I think that means the aardvark.

pangolin ant eater london zoo


CHAPTER FOURTEEN: BIRD LIFE AT THE ZOO

So many birds, Blyton says she found it hard to know which to write about and so has stuck to those you are likely to see at the zoo.

  • The eagleMany of them you cannot see under the best conditions – the eagles for instance. How can any one see the real splendour and power of an eagle when it is cooped up in a cage? Mountains and the blue sky are the proper background for a bird like that. That comes across as a bit mean – all about the visitor, never mind the poor birds.
  • The vultures, like jackals and hyaenas they are ‘dustmen’ eating leftovers from other carnivores. The condor is not a nice looking bird, he too would look better in his native home. (And be more comfortable probably!)

london zoo vulture

  • The owls. Blyton mentions a naked-footed owlet. I can’t find out anything about this. It appears in an 1877 book about London Zoo, but other than that I’ve drawn a blank. Naked-footed owl brings up another few very old sources. It/they must have another name though!
  • The ostrich can carry two men on his back. Ostrich feather farming is described  – where they wrap the males’ wings in cloth then the feathers are cut off. But it’s ok, it doesn’t hurt and they regrow!
  • FlamingoesOnce there came a gale and blew through the Zoo gardens. It scurried the flamingoes off their feet and gave them the lift they wanted in order to fly – and there were all thee Zoo’s precious flamingoes sailing over Regent’s Park, astonished and delighted to be able to use their wings again! It took a long time to recapture the but at last all but one were brought safe home again to Three Island Pond. 
  • The pelicans who store fish in their big baggy beak.
  • The parrots, and also cockatoos and parakeets. Unfortunately, when many parrots are kept together, as at the Zoo, the talkers seem to lose their “talk”, and simply screech and scream instead. (How dare they revert to their natural form of communication!) 
  • The Kea has become a meat-eater after white men found New Zealand and began farming sheep. They now fly down and try to eat sheep alive. The New Zealand Government offers five shillings to any one killing a kea.
  • The penguin. There’s a sad story of a penguin couple with an egg; the other penguins were so interested they wanted a turn at nursing it, and it broke. The mother penguin cuddled a piece of the broken shell for a long while after. Maybe it’s pregnancy hormones but that’s so tragic! (I also wonder how rare it was for penguins to successfully breed in zoos if all the other penguins were so fascinated by it.)
  • The peacock is described in detail making me wonder if peacocks weren’t common in the UK then as they were imported. Maybe you could only see them in zoos or in the private grounds of very rich people.

peacock london zoo


CHAPTER FIFTEEN: THE AQUARIUM

Ah, I now see that fish and other sea creatures are going to be covered here, as I did think them missing from the water loving animals chapter.

Much of the chapter focuses on the aquarium itself at first. It was built underground to maintain the temperature of the tanks and cost £55,000. It is a dark space with lit tanks so you can see the fish better. Sea water was brought in from the Sea of Biscay in steamers to London, then via barges up the Regent’s Canal to the Zoo. It was stored in reservoirs under the aquarium and pumped up into smaller reservoirs which then ran into the tanks. Water leaving the tanks then ran through sand to clean it. Compressed air was pumped into tanks too and the pipes were lined with enamel to prevent rust. It sounds like they put a great deal off effort into the project, and I hope it was successful in keeping the fish etc alive and well.

octopus london zoo

Not many animals get a long description but some mentioned are seaweeds, anenomes, fishes, shell-fish, crabs, lobsters, turtles, the octopus, salamanders and eels of different types. One interesting story is that flat-fish start out normal shaped and flatten by lying on the sea bed. This sounded so bizarre that I had to look it up. It’s not quite true, but they do start out like normal fish then go through a bizarre puberty.

Also interesting is that it takes half an hour for a lobster to shed its shell, as it doesn’t grow, and up to three weeks to replace it (they hide away when unprotected, I’ve never seen a ‘naked’ lobster at the aquarium!) Slightly contradicting herself from earlier Blyton says that Green turtles are always very lively. A good description of the sea horse is that it’s not much like a real horse but like a chess knight.

sea horses london zoo


CHAPTER SIXTEEN: FAMOUS ANIMALS

Most toy elephants are called Jumbo, claims Blyton, and there was a real Jumbo in 1865 which is where the name comes from. He carried children on rides for 16 years. Then, as sometimes happens with elephants when they are about twenty years old, he became restless and trouble-some. He would charge at the walls of his stall, splinter the wood and drive his tusks though the iron plates that strengthened his house. No one except his keeper dared go near him. When Scott took him out into the Gardens, Jumbo quietened down and was very peaceful. But it was dangerous to have an elephant about as strong and as big as Jumbo who might lose his temper any moment and kill someone. So the Zoo decided to sell him. 

Mr Barnum (I assume P.T. Barnum of the famous circus?) of the US wrote and offered £2000. But Jumbo wouldn’t get into the crate to go. It took five weeks to persuade him, and in that time a song was written about him and it was in the newspapers. Barnum showed him for three years and all was well, until… travelling in the wilderness by a railway line Jumbo charged at a train engine and lost.

Alice, Jumbo’s wife had also gone to Barnum’s, but she was burnt in a fire two years after Jumbo died. Another elephant, Jingo, was sold to Mr Bostock by the Zoo, but he was so homesick he died on the ship.

How very cheery! Next up, a load of primates who probably developed lung cancer…

Consul the chimp was brought up with an ordinary family so he could do excellent tricks and earned a lot of money. He could write and type his own name. He sounds like the inspiration for Sammy in the Galliano’s Circus books – he would eat a meal with cutlery, undress and get into bed etc. He also smoked cigarettes, though.

Mickey “a cripple” who swung himself about on his arms and had a real temper.

Orang-utans like Sandy who could smoke a pipe and Jacob who escaped and built a nest up a tree. Jacob was returned to his cage but the nest was left as a curiosity.

Sandy Junior who spat out meal worms at people.

Jenny the monkey, formerly a pet on a ship. She could smoke a pipe and drink out of a glass. Strangely she had a real chicken for a friend.

And then back to Sam and Barbara – Sam was shot when he got lonely after Barbara died. Another polar bear called Sam used to collect umbrellas. This habit began when someone poked him with an umbrella (as you do when you go to a zoo!) when he was asleep. Sam was angry, grabbed the umbrella and broke it into bits. 

After that he fancied more umbrellas so used to pretend he couldn’t reach a bit of fish on a ledge. So when the visitors used their umbrellas to help him out he would grab them and ruin them.


And there we have it. A rather fascinating insight into not only London Zoo but to the attitudes of people towards wild animals in the 1920s. A lot of it is really quite sad and uncomfortable. I was surprised at the many stories of death and suffering of Zoo animals. Perhaps it wouldn’t have been right to paint a picture that all zoo animals were happy and lived long lives but their suffering wasn’t detailed with the idea of raising awareness or making a point about animal welfare. It was all treated as rather ‘ho ho ho, how jolly.’

I’d love to know what children of the time made of it, and how much it expanded their knowledge of animals they had perhaps never even heard of before.

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Monday #229

We’re flying through the year and it’s our first Monday in August! Hope you like what we have for you this week!

Monday#229

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | Leave a comment

July 2017 round up

Well, I may or may not have done my last Monday post but this will definitely be my last monthly round up for a while!


WHAT I’VE READ

Despite being on maternity leave the whole month I haven’t found as much time for reading as I had hoped!

  • Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince – Audiobook narrated by Stephen Fry
  • Blotto, Twinks and the Dead Dowager Duchess (Blotto and Twinks #2) – Simon Brett
  • Why is This Night Different From all Other Nights? (All the Wrong Questions #4) – Lemony Snickett
  • The Zoo Book (reviewed in several parts)
  • Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Audiobook narrated by Stephen Fry
  • High Hopes: My Autobiography – Ronnie Corbett

For the baby:

  • Each Peach Pear Plum – Janet and Allan Ahlberg
  • Five Minutes’ Peace – Jill Murphy
  • Sally and the Limpet – Simon James
  • Ten Little Fingers and Ten Little Toes – Mem Fox
  • No Bed Without Ted – Nicola Smee

And still on the go (most of the ones from last month I haven’t picked up again lately):

  • Matilda – Roald Dahl audiobook narrated by Kate Winslet
  • The Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar – Roald Dahl audiobook
  • Dead Before Dark (Sookie Stackhouse #1) – Charlaine Harris audiobook

So I got through some of my library books at least! I was hoping the Harry Potter audiobooks would keep me going up until the birth but I finished them too soon and thought it was too soon for a third re-listen so I’ve moved onto something new. I got through over 114 hours of audiobooks this month!


WHAT I’VE WATCHED

  • The Highland Midwife which sadly only had three parts.
  • Hollyoaks, as always
  • Murder She Wrote. Season three of twelve now!
  • The Designated Survivor on Netflix
  • The Castle of Adventure – I’ve been reviewing more episodes for the blog

WHAT I’VE DONE 

  • Had a baby shower and got lots of lovely books (and lots of predictions of when baby will arrive, some people have already been proved wrong.)
  • Went to St Andrews with Stef and hobbled about very carefully.
  • Had a pamper afternoon with Stef with face masks, hair masks and strange foot masks.
  • Worn hiking boots all month to support my sprained ankle.
  • Taken lots of naps.
  • Done my best to finish the reviews of The Zoo Book and The Castle of Adventure before I disappear.
  • Gone out to lunch with my mum several times (what else is there to do on Maternity leave?).
  • Supervised/helped Ewan put together all the nursery furniture and put up the pictures we had. The whole room is organised and ready now!

WHAT STEF HAS READ

Current reads:

  • Too Many Cooks – Marina Pascoe
  • The Ravenmaster’s Boy – Mary Hoffman
  • Peggy and Me – Miranda Hart


WHAT STEF HAS WATCHED

I haven’t really watched anything much this month. Everything just seems to have gotten away from me. I have listed what I gave watched below:

  • Top Gear: India Special – Top Gear is one of my guilty pleasures, and I haven’t got Amazon Prime to catch up on Jeremy Clarkson, James May and Richard Hammond’s latest show, The Grand Tour, so I settle for reruns. 
  • The Antiques Roadshow – Caught a couple of episodes while I was there off a week or so ago, and they are delightfully quaint and humorous.>
  • Red Dwarf – Still watching the old series of this show with my other half. 

WHAT STEF HAS DONE

So I have been quite a busy bee this month, one way and another.

  • A visit to Fiona, in which I played nursemaid for she had sprained her ankle the week before.
  • Had a pamper day with Fiona, with products from Lush to make sure that there was nothing to cause any issues with baby.
  • BBQ – even though we haven’t quite had the weather I have had two bbqs this month, one in Nottingham with some old friends and my goddaughter, and then with my work, in which I was able to just chill with my colleagues.

So not done that much either, so sorry for being boring. I will try and be better next month!

Posted in Personal Experiences | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

The Caravan Family

thecaravanfamilyFinally, I hear you cry, she’s found and read the first book in the series! Now perhaps she can tell us what happened in the beginning (assuming that you haven’t already read them in order like you’re supposed to! What a topsy-turvy reviewing process we’ve been through with this series. At least now we can say they have all been done! With that said, lets have a look at the very first Family Series book.

The beginning of the Caravan Family

Mike, Belinda and Ann have been staying with their mother and grandmother in their grandmother’s house while their father has been ‘away’ for two years. Having just looked at the year the book was published, it was the end of the Second World War, so Enid Blyton could have been referring to the children’s father being away at the war, which would strike a chord with many of the children reading these serialised books in magazines.  No reference beyond that of Daddy coming home is made again, but if it’s anything like the Blyton books we know, she will have wanted them to be far removed from reality so the children could enjoy themselves. This is partly why the Famous Five books never mention the war, and they have amazing food, because Blyton wanted children to remember happier times, I assume.

Anyway, after coming home, Mummy and Daddy decide that they need to move out of Granny’s house and that they would quite like a country cottage somewhere, but it turns out that they can’t afford the ones they like. Daddy doesn’t have much money – which begs the question how can he afford the trips away, and the trip on the Queen Elizabeth later on, so I assume he gets a brilliantly paid job or one with lots of benefits, so the children and their mother can live in relative comfort.

Soon it becomes clear that the little cottage in the country is out of their reach and, while they are walking to go back to Granny’s, the children spot some old, run down, gypsy caravans in a farmers field. After some discussion the Farmer agrees to sell them to the family, and the children are overjoyed. There is a snag however, that this will only be temporary until school starts again and Mummy and Daddy can find somewhere else for them to live.

After a spell of cleaning, repairing and repainting the caravans, they all move in on the farm where the caravans stand, given that there are no horses to pull them at this point. The children are soon running around the farm helping and becoming very sensible, which surprises their mother who often found it quite hard to get them to do chores while they were living at their grandmother’s. Now they are making beds, tidying, washing up, cooking, fetching wood for fires and not to mention all of the other things they get to do on the farm!  The children grow more respectful of the world around them and little Ann gets over her fear of cows and geese, and helps as much as the other two do.

There’s a lovely little part when they move into the caravan for the first night and Mike ‘dictates’ where everyone will sleep. Unusually for the eldest he doesn’t demand the topmost bunk, but says he will sleep at the bottom because he’s the eldest. Belinda is then to sleep in the middle and Ann at the top. I don’t know why but I felt this was very sweet and well meaning of him, because in books such as the Famous Five, Julian would very much demand the top bunk but Mike seems to be a less demanding older brother. What a nice change.

As we move on through the book, we meet Uncle Ned and Aunt Clara, who also own a farm and the children all pitch in and help get the harvest done, and the horses, Davey and Clopper also help pull the machines. It’s nice to get some context of Uncle Ned and Aunt Clara and I think it finally answers my question as to why they don’t stay on their farm. The school that Mummy and Daddy want to send the children to is a long way from the farm so they have to move the caravans for the children to be able to attend, and it ends with the caravans being pulled off into a sunny day (well it looks like a sunset in my edition, but I don’t think the caravans would be moved at night time. Not these ones anyway!)

What I thought of it

Actually this whole little story is very sweet and endearing! The development of the children, the finding the caravans and them the whole life on the farms. You get a feel for the animals and the farm as Blyton manages to transport you to these amazing places in technicolor. Although we love her mysteries and adventures, I feel her real forte was nature and animals. Her writing does seem to come alive with them and that is what makes The Caravan Family such an engaging read.

Belinda, Mike and Ann are very sweet as well, skipping about, wanting to help and getting stuck in with the chores. I know it sounds strange, but since my first reading (at the end of the series) where I had no real idea about them, they have grown on me as young innocent things who are very much young people who are beginning to understand and take on the world. I suppose now that I have all the books – even though some of them are new text editions – I will have to read them through the proper way around to really get a proper feeling for the characters and any growth in the children. The amusing thing is though, that they do feel as though they don’t get much older. They always seem to stay around the same age, which is a tactic employed very well by Blyton and other authors, where despite the passing seasons the children refuse to age. How I wish I had that superpower!

Anyway, all I think I can say now is that you need to read this quiet gem of a Blyton series. Yes, some of them aren’t as good as others and I may have been hasty in some of my first opinions, but you know, I reckon they’re well worth the reading time!

Let me know what you think in the comments below!

Next post: The Saucy Jane Family

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , , , | 6 Comments

The Adventure Series on TV: The Castle of Adventure, part 6

Yet again we ended with a cliff-hanger created by character clumsiness/silliness. Previously we have had Dinah sliding off a perfectly good tree-bridge and Jack being attacked by an eagle while climbing the tower. Not to mention all the high-drama accidents mid-episode like Philip nearly falling from the plank, both Jack and Lucy-Ann (separately) falling down slopes and so on.

Well, obviously Jack’s not going to fall to his death, as that would rather spoil the programme. But now he will be trapped inside the castle, at least until the other children replace the plank.


THE BAD GUYS REVEAL A LITTLE MORE (BUT NOT MUCH!)

Allie’s American friend, who we now know is in charge of the spying operation at the castle, meets up with his boss. He’s wanting out as his underlings are useless (he seems quite justified here). The only way out, though, is at the wrong end of a gun so sensibly he chooses to stay in. All we know about the boss at this stage is that he’s a whispering man.

It turns out that Sam is ferrying supplies to the spies (try saying that ten times fast) at the castle, so it’s no wonder he’s been so keen to keep Tassie away from the place. He admits, though, that he has no idea who has hired him. He just delivers.

He hangs around later as well and has a chat with the spies, it’s not clear how much he knows about their doings.

Jack then overhears the spies discussing how they also don’t know who they’re working for, but discuss a fair bit about their audio/visual spying methods.


SECRETS ARE THE ORDER OF THE DAY

The children try very hard to persuade Aunt Jane to let them join Jack at the castle. She’s not at all happy with any of it – until they stuff her up with a load of nonsense about SRTs. SRTs are (apparently) survival trips into the wilderness that they go on from school all the time. Often alone, Philip stresses. But mostly in small groups, Dinah says very firmly to ensure that she’s not left out.

Aunt Jane calls Allie to check this out but clearly doesn’t mention the phony SRTs as Allie says they can go, because ‘she trusts Philip’. This is after Philip has struck the rather low blow of Dad would have let us go.

Sam is also keeping secrets. He seems to have Tassie’s mother believing that all his income comes from his ‘rag and bone’ trade, but she questions this as a week’s worth of scrap metal has hardly netted anything. She also wants to know how long he is planning to stay – after all he said he’d be around for three months and it’s been four and a half. From this I’m not sure if they knew each other before he turned up.


THE TRENTS ARE NOT SHOWING US THEIR BEST SIDES

Well Lucy-Ann has always been rather annoying and this episode is no exception. When they arrive at the castle she’s first to see the plank is not at the window. Before the others have even cleared the wall she’s wailing Where’s the plank? The plank’s gone! It’s right at her flippin’ feet!

There she is, looking up, and then three small paces forward the plank is just lying there!

She then repeatedly whines about not being scared but not wanting to explore the cellars. In the book Lucy-Ann is so good-natured and kind that her being the most afraid of the group isn’t a problem. This Lucy-Ann however has no redeeming qualities!

Jack’s problems are more in the careless vein. He leaves a camera film box lying out in the castle courtyard for the spies to find. Now Jack and the other clearly suspect there are other people around the castle, and while they don’t yet know they are bad guys, book Jack would be more careful (and environmentally conscious!)

And later, once he’s shown the others to the cellar he disappears to find Kiki. Why? He knows how to get in and out of the cellar so obviously has to be out of the way to allow the others to be trapped but it makes no sense for him to go hunting for Kiki who is more than capable of flying away from any dangers.


AND SO FOR THE MAIN DRAMAS

After getting safely into the castle, (almost surprising that they didn’t squeeze in another near-fall) and shouting JAAACCKK at the top of their voices, Dinah doesn’t believe Jack about the spies. She thinks he’s dreamed it all – well the part where they tried to climb up to Jack’s hide and were attacked by the eagle is rather far fetched. And really, it is a miracle the two groups have never run into each other so far, as neither lot have been particularly discreet.

On a side-note I can’t work out where Jack’s hide is. It is reached via a long metal ladder (which looks more modern than the rest of the ruins) and has a good view of the nest. Why didn’t the boys go there the first time instead of climbing the ivy-covered tower?

From the pictures you can see there’s at least one stone wall and a wooden one too – and his ‘hide’ is really just a screen stuck in the middle of the space.

Anyway, the only way for Jack to prove there are spies is to lead the others right into their den. And so he does – then abandoning them as I’ve said above to hunt for Kiki. And dun-dun-dun would you believe it? The spies are on their way back just as the kids are heading underground.

Philip then creates even more drama by a) getting into a suit of armor in around ten seconds, without any noise and b) scares the girls so much that Lucy-Ann accidentally hits the trapdoor-shutting axe.

Unfortunately all three are too dumb to work out what she’s done and have to wait for Jack to rescue them. Except maybe it’s not Jack, maybe it’s the spies…


SOME RANDOM OTHER THOUGHTS FROM THE EPISODE

One plus is that the cellar has a big old-fashioned four-poster bed. It’s always nice when details from a book are kept, even if they’re not all that important. On the other hand, it bugs me when other details are abandoned or changed for no reason. Jack refers to Kiki as a good boy in this episode, for example. It’s clear all through the books that Kiki is a female.

Then there’s Philip suddenly being called Phil, ugh. That’s probably worse than Lucy-Ann getting shortened to Lucy.

And lastly, the MOD seem to be full-on role playing while testing their new machine, which just look odd, and a bit of a waste of budget (unless it’s stock footage from somewhere I suppose!)


So another episode where not an awful lot happens. A few secrets are revealed, I suppose, but the only real ‘event’ is the girls and Philip getting trapped down in the cellar, and that happens in the last few minutes.

Posted in Blyton on TV | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Monday #228

Happy Due Date Fiona!

Baby’s due today so I will be waiting with crossed fingers for news as I know she’s very keen to meet him, and very pregnanty at the moment! Hope you’ll send good wishes to her, to try and help baby come on time! Let’s hope we have some good news before next Monday!

Anyway, that said, this is what we have for you this week:

Monday#228

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 3 Comments

The Zoo Book, part 4

I’m looking at chapters ten to twelve this week, which leaves just four more after that.


CHAPTER TEN: THE GIRAFFE AND HIS COUSINS

Blyton has some advice here: If you happen to be a girl and go to the Zoo wearing a hat with a wreath of flowers round it, don’t stand too near the giraffe’s cage. It’s probably unnecessary advice these days (though maybe giraffes are attracted to plastic flowers on headbands?). I do remember at Edinburgh Zoo the giraffes could reach you over a high wall around the back of their enclosure. Sadly there are no giraffes at Edinburgh now.

She also mentions how dangerous giraffes can be:

Look in the giraffe’s stall at the Zoo, and you will see a small piece of plate glass fixed over a hole knocked in the wooden wainscot. That hole was made by a giraffe. He suddenly lowered his head one day, swung his neck round, and gave a sidelong, hammering blow at his keeper – but missed him by an inch! Instead, his horned head struck the wood and gave the giraffe a nasty surprise.

I can imagine, as I’ve seen giraffes using their heads/necks as clubs to fight other giraffes on documentaries and it’s quite astonishing the noise it makes!

Then we go on to the ‘cousins’ to use Blyton’s usual loose terminologies!

  • The camel. I think there has often been a misconception that a camel’s hump stores water, but Blyton makes it clear that it supplies fats for a period when they can’t get much to eat. She also explains that they have water cells that can hold 1.5l of water for dry times (probably why the above confusion arises).  I can never remember the right way around but Blyton does tell us that the Arabian camel has one hump and the Bactrian has two (and is also the more bad tempered). Dromedaries (a breed of Arabian camels, but I had to look that up) are best for riding, and are faster than “ordinary” camels.
  • Llamas are obstinate and self-willed, though sometimes ridden still. We are told they have a very nasty habit of spitting. 
  • The zebra. Zebras can be tamed, but not very easily. They become very tired if ridden for long. There was once a gentleman, however, who taught three zebras to run in harness with a pony and draw his carriage through the London streets; but they never became good tempered and were always ready to bite. Probably because they are wild animals and never truly domesticated. It must have been quite a sight though!


CHAPTER ELEVEN: LOVERS OF THE WATER

There are some people who think that all animals who live in the sea must be some kind of fish, but that idea is quite wrong. No animal written of in this chapter, except the shark, is a fish.

Who are these people? I know some people believe that whales etc are fish, but surely everyone has heard of seals and know they’re not a fish?

Anyway, she describes fish, how they breath underwater via gills and so on. Sea animals come to the surface to breathe (ie whales and sea lions). Fish have scales and fins, sea animals which do not belong to the fish family have no fins and have their bodies covered with fur. That just confuses things, doesn’t it? It sounds like there are a lot of furry fin-less whales swimming around.

  • Seals have two fur coats which are oiled. She mentions ladies’ seal-skin jackets which are hopefully a thing of the past now! From that it’s obvious that seals are hunted for their skins but she doesn’t say anything about how they are ‘collected’. Perhaps the brutal seal-clubbing that goes on was a step too far to describe?  There is a really good and long description of  the various parts of seal anatomy, but she doesn’t attempt to delve into the various different seal species.

London Zoo seal

  • Sea-lions aka “hair-seal” (I haven’t heard it called that before!), looks nothing like a lion (you can imagine some poor kids imaginations running wild with the name!). Blyton includes some ‘facts’ and anecdotes which I have included below:

They are very clever animals, and can be taught to perform all sorts of amusing tricks, which they seem to enjoy thoroughly… a sea-lion living in the Zoo would climb up and down a ladder, fire off a gun and kiss its keeper!

There was once a sea-lion who thought he would like a walk round the Zoo, so he climbed over his wall and over the railings and set off round the gardens. He scrambled over the flower beds and the grass, and suddenly arrived at the deep pool belonging to the polar bears. He thought the pool looked rather nice, even if it did have bears in it, so he took a header and dived in.

Alas! the bears did not like such a sudden visitor, and they attacked him. Before the keepers could rescue him he was so badly bitten that he died.

  • The walrus: Blyton feels the need to explain that the walrus  is a real animal, not just something made up by Lewis Carroll! I was interested to learn that the name comes from whale-horse.
  • The sea-elephant – which I thought might have been a manatee* but turns out to actually be the elephant seal. It has a curious trunk and huge size (it can grow to 20 ft long Blyton says – I just had to check that! and it’s true, exceptional males can get that big).  Thankfully they are not a conservation concern now, though Blyton says they were well-hunted for their leather-like skin.
  • The whale. Blyton confirms this is not a fish as it is warm blooded. Whales never leave the sea to go on land. If it happens to be thrown on shore by a storm, it is quite helpless, and has to lie there until it dies. How pleasant! Blyton says there are two kinds of whales – one with teeth and the other with long fringes of whalebone instead, used like a brush to sieve small fish from the water. Apparently the Greenland whale is the best known and is where we get most of our whalebone. (Greenland whale is also known as the bowhead whale or Arctic whale. I’d still argue that the blue whale or the whale shark is better known, but maybe not then!) The blubber and whalebone from one Greenland whale would have been worth 3-4 thousand pounds, (which is around £200,000 today!). Big whales were getting rarer in the 1920s due to over hunting, but other things are being used instead of whalebone so whaling is gradually being given up.
  • Porpoises and dolphins. Porpoises are apparently also known as sea hogs! Dolphins are such clever and interesting animals but hardly anything is said about them, or porpoises.
  • The shark, the only true fish of the chapter. With one snap of its cruel mouth it can bite a man’s arm or leg off, whoops, there’s a whole load of kids terrified to go into the sea long before Jaws was released!
  • The beaver. Blyton moves into fresh-water animals now and describes the beaver and how it builds dams.
  • Otters. I love otters so I was disappointed to get just a small paragraph about them.

I wonder if the Zoo just didn’t bother with fish seeing as they don’t really get a mention, or other sea-creatures like eels, crabs and so on.


CHAPTER TWELVE: SNAKES

Snakes are almost as bad as hyenas in Blyton’s eyes!

I do not think you will spend a very long time in the Reptile House at the Zoo. Modern and up-to-date though the Reptile House is, the inmates are not very pleasant. Snakes, crocodiles and alligators are evil-looking, and the tortoises are so sleepy and motionless that one soon tires of watching them.

I have to say that the reptile house was one of my favourite parts at Edinburgh. It had snakes, tortoises, poison arrow frogs and caimans amongst other things. I was so sad when I went maybe five or six years ago and discovered that they’d knocked it down!

She does then says that snakes have beautiful colouring, and move in a curious gliding way. Snake anatomy is described well too. Some people will tell you that snakes sting (Really?). Blyton explains that actually they bite – the “sting” is its forked tongue. She describes how they shed their skins and the anatomy of biting. Rattlesnakes, Indian cobras, King cobras, boa constrictors, pythons and anacondas all get a mention.

But it all gets brought back to how horrible snakes are:

The snakes at the Zoo are fed once a week, but I have never been to see them fed. I do not think I should like to see a snake swallowing a duck or a goat whole, and watch the animal slowly going down its neck and body. I think it would be a horrid sight, don’t you?

London Zoo cobra


So another interesting few chapters. It’s interesting how it swings from ‘amusing anecdotes’ about polar bears killing sea lions to very factual descriptions of anatomy etc, to Blyton’s clear animal biases and fascinating old ‘facts’ and names of animals.

I can only imagine what it would have been like reading this as a child before such a thing as television existed.

*As it turns out the manatee is a sea cow.

Next post: The Zoo Book part 5

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment