Making Blyton’s Food: Treacle tart

So this recipe had to be done in two steps for me, from two different cook books because the book I had for the treacle tart told me I needed short crust pastry.

I’ve never made that before, and if I have I don’t remember. Ironically The National Trust Complete Traditional Recipe Book  doesn’t have a recipe for short crust pastry, so I had to improvise and get a recipe from Delia Smith’s Complete Cookery Course. So for those of you who know how to make short crust pastry, you can skip this first bit and go straight to the treacle tart!

Short crust pastry – ingredients

  • 6 oz or 175 g plain flour
  • 3 oz or 80g butter or margarine
  • pinch of salt
  • cold water, to mix

Method

  1. Sift flour and salt into large mixing bowl – holding sieve up high to get lots of air to the mixture
  2. Cut the butter/ marge into cubes and add to the flour
  3. Use fingertips to lightly rub the mixture together, lifting it so there is lots of air in the mixture
  4. When it looks uniformly crumbly start adding the water, starting with 2 tablespooons at a time.
  5. Use a round tipped knife to blend together, adding more water if needed.
  6. Use your hands when the mixture is together and shape into a ball.
  7. Cover with clingfilm or foil and put in the fridge for 20 – 30 mins.

Now for the treacle tart.

Ingredients

  • short crust pastry (about 350g worth!)
  • 450g golden syrup (or black treacle or both if you’re like me and ran out of golden syrup!)
  • zest and juice of 1 lemon
  • 225 g fresh breadcrumbs
  • 1 crisp apple or pear peeled and grated
  • 1 teaspoon of mixed spice
  • 1 egg yolk beaten with a little water
  • pouring cream, crème fraîche or yoghurt to serve (Or ice cream or custard, or anything you want really!)

Method

  1. preheat the oven to 180C, 350F or gas mark 4
  2. roll out pastry
  3. grease 25cm (10 inch) flan dish and line with the pastry, reserving a quarter of the pastry for the top.
  4. warm syrup and lemon up in the pan
  5. stir in the breadcrumbs, grated fruit and the spice mix
  6. pour into uncooked pastry case
  7. use the last quarter of the pastry to make a lattice on top.
  8. brush lattice with egg mixture
  9. bake for approximately 35 minutes or until set.
Posted in Food and recipes | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Last Monday of the Month

So this week we see the last day of February, the 29th, which won’t come around for another 4 years! In which time we shall (hopefully) have a new government and the next Olympic Games will be almost upon us.

Anyway this week I shall be on Wednesday post duty again, with a making Blyton’s food blog all about making treacle tart a la Mrs Stick in Five Run Away Together and Fiona will be supplying us with a review of her 1970s Pepys card game, following on from the review she did of the original game  last year.

These are a couple pictures I took a few weeks ago when we had a frosty morning that I was awake for! Hope you like them.

 

 

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Twins at St Clare’s – How has Blyton’s original text fared in a modern edition? part 4

I’ve compared three chapters this week, from the Egmont paperback from 2005 (on loan from Stef) and the Methuen 6th impression from 1945. Earlier posts are in parts one, two and three.


CHAPTER NINE: A LACROSSE MATCH – AND A PUZZLE

For a large part of this chapter I thought the editors had either given up or fallen asleep – the text matched word for word except for a few missing hyphens which could have been pre-programmed with a nice ‘replace all’ command.

In the last few pages however, there are actually a few small changes. As with previous chapters pounds become shillings. The school maids are now staff (before they had been called messengers).


CHAPTER TEN: A VERY MUDDLED GIRL

This is another very quiet chapter on the updates front. Two shillings become yours (as in your money), and a shilling becomes a pound. Lastly a printing error is corrected. Originally Miss Theobald had said p oo Kathleen [copied exactly, there is a space between the P and the OO]. She now says poor Kathleen, which I am sure is what she meant to say in the first place!

A couple of money references are not updated, strangely enough as they have been reasonably consistent and sensible so far. Kathleen receives only a penny a week from her old aunt, a rather stingy amount even for the early 1940s. Bizarrely in 2005 she is still getting only a penny a week! No wonder she [spoiler alert!] steals money from the other girls. After that Pat jokes about taking a hundred pounds from a bank account and gifting it to Kathleen. This remains at a hundred pounds, despite that being a far smaller amount now that it would have been then. For example an average house cost £750 and a new car could be bought for around £80. A thousand pounds would have made more sense and kept the shock factor.


CHAPTER ELEVEN:  MISS KENNEDY AGAIN

A little more is altered in this chapter. The school’s sick-room (usually called the san or sanatorium at Malory Towers) is now the sickbay. Twice in the Methuen edition flu is placed in inverted commas (or apostrophes, I suppose, though they are the same punctuation which surrounds the speech), which looks a little strange. I have seen it as ‘flu as it is short for influenza, but I suppose that back in the 40s (or indeed, the 4os)they felt the need to indicate letters missing from the end as well.

The cat that is involved in the trick on Miss Kennedy has its name changed from Blackie to Sooty. Presumably they felt there was something racist about naming a cat after its colour. Likewise, later, Kathleen mentions the black cat, which is now just the cat. 

Lastly some italics are removed. The twins say that Miss Kennedy was a silly, but the emphasis is removed. It’s left in the next sentence on the girls were wretches.


That’s only eight new changes over those three chapters, possibly a record for the least found so far. It makes a total of fifty three for the whole book.

Posted in Updating Blyton's Books | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Famous Five 90s Style: Five Go to Demon’s Rocks

Five go to Demons Rocks is one of my favourite books and one of my first books as a child, although it was much later on in my life when I actually read the story. Again I see it as a high point in the series, along with Fix and Finniston Farm. Mystery to Solve and Together again always seem like let downs after such big adventures, and Together again should not have been the book to finish off such a well loved series.

Anyway, the adaptation of Five go to Demons Rocks, which I believe was on one of the videos I used to get out of the library as a child and watch almost continually. When I rewatched it as an adult I was crying with laughter at how bad it was. I wish I could have a different view of it, but now I can see all the flaws, and this particular episode feels worse than others, mostly because of the attempt at special effects. Nowadays we can see these  special effects as ‘bad’ but I suspect that is mostly because of the quality of Special effects nowadays!

The editing is a bit choppy as well, scenes are reused an stitched together with no continuity considered. As a child I skated over these inaccuracies but as an adult they are hard to ignore. There is a particular scene which is used multiple times, where Dick and Julian climb down the tunnel of the lighthouse and follow the cave network under the bay to try and find some treasure. However the part with Julian climbing down is from an earlier scene where he goes to explore the tunnel before the main bulk of the adventure happens. Now that might have simply been a padding shot, where the producers needed a few more seconds on the episode but the children had gone home, so they couldn’t film another bit and just slotted in another.

However a similar thing happens with two adult actors, Jacob and Ebenezer ( played respectively by Gary Dunnington and Shend) standing on the quayside making faces at Jeremiah and the children is repeated at another point when the nastiness of the villians needs to be reestablished. In fact, alongside the actors from Finniston Farm, these two make rather good villians with the non comedic aspect being played down.

On the other hand, looking at the children and their visiting co-star, James Tomlinson who plays Tinker, seem to have been given the most over the top things to say in this episode. There is a lot of overacting from Marco Williamson, and Paul Child. there is a possibility that Demons Rocks was filmed when they were still quite new to the Famous Five, so it was part of them being keen and settling down into the soon to be familiar routine.

Overall there is rather a mishmash of issues with this episode, including the timings. At one point Jeremiah says that they have plenty of time before the tide comes in and sweeps through the caves, and then almost only a minute later he says they better be leaving as the tide is on the turn. Its almost like someone turned the page and had forgotten what they had written! Either way, it should have been picked up and changed before airing. Even if you could have some other thing in there to make the time elapsed seem longer. As a child its possible I just didn’t care for this and it didn’t matter, which is why it was left in, but as an adult it feels sloppy.

The main bones of the story are still there however, and is quite successfully portrayed. Even the theft of the items from the lighthouse is shown and the conversation with the man in the general store after the children have spoken to Jeremiah. These are the nice touches that reassure us that the script on this occasion was in good hands.

Overall the episode has the story in place, but the production of it seems quite shoddy, as if the producers just couldn’t be bothered to get it right and make it quite as seemless as the other ones in the series. As I have said it is the only one that stands out as bad special effects. The use of the rain at the end, looks very superimposed (I don’t know what the correct term is, I’m afraid!), and the children just end up looking like they have had a bucket of water thrown over their heads.

As usual I would love to have your opinions, the episode can be found on YouTube, so please let me know what you think!

demons rocks1

Posted in Blyton on Screen | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Monday

Another week and we’re creeping closer to spring (only a month to go!).

Stef’s post from last about Murder Most Unladylike has proved popular, and has even been read by Robin Stevens herself! (The joys of twitter!)

robintweet

I have a copy of the book too, now I just need to get around to reading it. Anyway, on the blog this week:

wedfri

And as always, if you’ve read a great Blyton recently do send us a review (even if we have already reviewed it).

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Looking at The Famous Five Annual 2016, part 2

On to the second half of the annual this week. The first half is reviewed here. You can also see my review of the first annual from 2014 here and here, and then the 2015 one here and here.


A TOUR ROUND KIRRIN

This is based around a map which I’ve seen a few times before, from The Famous Five – Everything You Needed To Know book. Just because I can’t resist nitpicking – I don’t know if Kirrin Island, Kirrin Castle and Uncle Quentin’s tower needed separate entries. Especially the last one which was a temporary structure! Other than that it has a great deal of detail and includes places from the short stories as well.


ISLAND OF DANGER

This is an extremely simple maze (and kind of looks more like a page decoration than an actual puzzle).

DSCN4605


A LADDER TO A BADDIE!

A trickier puzzle. Would have been even harder if they had left clues to the baddies’ names.


FIVE GET INTO A FIX FIND-A-WORD

A word search based on Five Get Into a Fix. Interestingly (for conspiracy theorists) they’ve included Barnard.


UNTITLED PAGE

The cover from an American video of a Danish film version of Five Get Into Trouble. Must admit I’d never even heard of this!


FIVE ON KIRRIN ISLAND AGAIN

Another comic extract. I quite like the look of George, even if she is a tad feminine and also in rather modern clothes. Unfortunately the text is very modern too – George uses words like yipes. She also thinks the castle is spooky at night, not quite the brave girl we are used to! It’s a very small fragment of the story as well.

DSCN4606


HIDDEN MESSAGES

A simple guide to making your own codes.


FIVE GO DOWN TO THE SEA WORD CROSS

Also known as a crossword! Tricky-ish if you don’t have a good memory for names. Question 13 should really have a plural answer, but the ‘correct’ answer is singular.

DSCN4604


UP ON THE MOORS

An even tinier fragment, this time from Five Go Off to Camp. Nothing exciting happens and Mr Luffy looks truly bizarre. Anne looks very much like her 70s incarnation but I can’t say the same for the other characters.

DSCN4607


THE FAMOUS FIVE IN AMERICA

I found this part really interesting. I was aware of a couple of the American editions but not all of them. I rather like Vera Neville’s illustrations. They’re suitable for the time period.


THE FIENDISH FAMOUS FIVE QUIZ

I can think of a better puzzle – spot the errors!

Q5 is about the undersea tunnel between Kirrin Island and the mainland, yet it tells us to see Five Go off in a Caravan. Q14 then asks about Jo rescuing George from a tower in Five in a Caravan. Not only is that NOT even a real book title, the book they want is Five Fall Into Adventure. 

There are also some unnecessary question marks and unnecessary book titles inserted. For example Q8 includes Five on a Hike Together in the body of the question, then refers us to it at the end.

It just seems they rather gave up by this point and didn’t recheck anything they wrote.


FIVE GO ADVENTURING AGAIN

This bears little resemblance to the original. The Five come home to find Professor Roland in Kirrin Cottage looking suspicious. There’s a secret code in a prayer book, secrets at Mill House, priest holes, wooden panels in the shape of a cross. At the end it tells us we know what to do to find out whether or not Mr Roland can be trusted. Er… anyone who seeks the real book will not recognise any of it!

DSCN4608

You’re right, George. It makes no sense at all!


CASTLES AND OTHER BUILDINGS

This is fine, but suffers from a lack of attention to detail again. It begins with nice headings and a little text about the location, then becomes text with highlighted place names, then forgets about highlights/titles altogether. One passage highlights Gloomy Water which is a lake, when I suspect they meant to highlight Two Trees, the building. If they wanted to, they could have included Mrs Thomas’ house in Five Get Into a Fix or Red Tower’s place. I assume they skipped Kirrin Castle as it is discussed at the start of the annual.


MR LUFFY’S FRUITCAKE

I didn’t spot this on the title page so I was rather bemused to find a recipe. I can’t think of any obvious connection between Mr Luffy and baking. It would have made more sense to have Joan/Joanna’s fruitcake recipe. (It turns out the recipe is actually from the Five Go Off to Camp Annual from 1984).


WHICH CHARACTER ARE YOU?

A simple pick-an-answer quiz which pairs you with a member of the five (plus Jo). It’s perhaps complicated a little by linking the numbered answers to letters to then reveal your character. It would have been easier had the statements been lettered in the first place, with mostly As making you Julian etc. The annual is for children who are less likely to be swayed by ‘ooh I’ll pick all Cs as I think that will give me my favourite character’.

Anyway I came out as (mostly) Timmy.


Several sections of the annual were supposedly first published in The Famous Five Everything You Ever Wanted to Know. I happen to have a copy and have flicked through it. It seems the annual makers have lifted lines and paragraphs from various parts of the book and then reorganised them into their own articles – and that’s where the mistakes and inconsistencies have crept in. It seems that Norman Wright’s original writings are of a much higher standard and I’ll definitely review his book at some point.

All in all this is another good annual. There are some real highlights – mostly the pieces on the relatively unknown adaptations. If the makers just paid a little more attention to detail it could be better. This one also seemed a little comic heavy, but I suppose it is difficult to source new material.

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

If you like Blyton: Murder Most Unladylike by Robin Stevens

Occasionally Fiona and I find books that feel like the Blyton books we so know and love. Modern authors can sometimes channel our beloved authoress and we do our best to find them and bring them to your attention.

So far I’ve reviewed Helen Moss, and Fiona has done Susie Day. These authors we find worthy to bring you are few and far between but when one grabs us, we do just have to share.

Robin Stevens is a new author to me, and I haven’t seen anything else by her until I came across Murder Most Unladylike in Waterstones a while back. The book has been on my shelf to read for ages, and when I found a cut-price copy of the third book I knew I had to get reading.

Set in 1930’s England, in a boarding school that reminds me of Malory Towers, Daisy Wells and Hazel Wong make up the Detective Society at Deepdean Boarding school. It’s never actually specified where Deepdean is, but its possible it has sea-side leanings, well I would imagine it to have those because that is where part of the Blyton magic comes in.

Daisy Wells is a sort of know-it-all joker who strongly resembles Alicia Johns from the Malory Towers books. Hazel Wong however, a girl from Hong Kong placed in the school at her father’s insistence to become a proper English girl with a proper education, is possibly a bit of a mix of sensible Sally Hope, and terribly unfit Gwendoline Lacy. Hazel does not have a bad bone in her body however, which is what makes her like Sally, but she is overly fond of cakes, which leads us to Gwendoline. Either way, the girls are fantastic characters and really carry the plot along!

Its written in the style of the Sherlock Holmes stories, Hazel acting as the Doctor Watson, and Daisy as Holmes. These names are mentioned several times in the book, and Daisy often calls Hazel her Watson. The fact that Hazel writes the notes of the story up, helps with the very Sherlockian perception of Daisy and her brilliant ideas.

We follow the girls through the rough and tumble of school life as unexpectedly, one of their school mistresses is murdered. Hazel discovers the body and Daisy decides that this is the case the Detective Society has been waiting for and they launch into operations a la The Five Find-Outers.

Honestly, I don’t know how to explain much of this book without giving its brilliant plot away. Its worth a read, nice, short chapters for those who prefer that sort of writing and the lack of technology is pleasing and everything is solved through wits and observations. The whole book has a lovely nostalgic feeling running through it, as everything is worked out logically and methodically but with that childish flair.

I would honestly recommend this book to anyone who wants something new to read, young or old, and especially for someone who wants to have another boarding school experience! The Wells and Wong mysteries are sitting on my bookshelves waiting to be read and I can’t wait to get cracking on the next one.

Please do give it a try and let me know what you think? I do think that Robin Stevens is one to watch, especially from a Blyton Point of View!

murder-most-unladylike

Posted in Other Authors, Reading Recommendations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Monday, Monday

Well February seems to be disappearing very very fast! Its probably because its a short month, but it always feels like its going quicker than all the others!

Anyway this week we have a recommended read from me of Robin Stevens  Murder Most Unladylike and you’ll see when I review it on Wednesday why it reminds me so much of a Blyton adventure!

Fiona will be completing the review of the 2016 Famous Five annual for you on Friday. I hope you’ll enjoy the blogs this week, and just remember if you want to submit anything for us to use, just email it to us!

In celebration of the nights getting lighter I shall leave you with a lovely sunset picture I took in one of my local parks last year. I haven’t been really able to get out with the camera recently so I’m having to look back! Hope you like it!

DSC_0101

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Here Comes Noddy Again – How has Blyton’s original text fared in a modern edition?

Continuing with this series I’ve looked through my old hardback (so old the cover is in two parts…) and the treasury.

Previous posts:
Noddy Goes to Toyland
Hurrah for Little Noddy!
Noddy and His Car

DSCN4541


A FEW CHANGES ARE THE SAME ACROSS ALL THE BOOKS

  • Various phrases lose their hyphens
  • Mr no longer has a full stop
  • The/a policeman is named as Mr Plod. Though a couple of times he is Mr Plod the policeman, which isn’t necessary after the first time.

OTHERS ARE SO MINOR YOU WONDER WHY THEY BOTHERED

Sentences are reordered

  • One day he took Mary Mouse to catch the train versus He took Mary Mouse to catch the train one day.
  • There came a knock at the little front door one morning to One morning there was a knock at Noddy’s little front door. The setting was already Noddy’s house so did we need that specified?

Words are replaced

  • Hallo is changed to hello once, but left as hallo at least one other time.
  • Likewise till becomes until once or twice yet is left as till later.
  • He will get a shock becomes he would get a shock, though the tense isn’t all that important.
  • Farmhorse becomes horse.
  • Noddy no longer drives madly, but instead as fast as he can.
  • The wood becomes the woods.
  • Noddy threatens the clockwork clown if he turns head over heels in the car – I leave you behind. Admittedly it’s an unusual phrasing but it isn’t like it hasn’t been heard before. I can easily imagine my dad saying “do that again and I stop the car and turn it around…” etc. Anyway, it has become I’ll leave you behind.
  • He becomes they when it is said that he was out of Bouncing Ball Village. Yes he had a companion in the car but we are having the story from Noddy’s viewpoint.
  • He opened his eyes with a jump becomes the toy animal opened his eyes. We know who Mr Noah is talking to at the time without this change.
  • Noddy calls to Big Ears to come down and let me in,  and then Big Ears sees him down below. These become come and let me in and Noddy being outside. That matches the illustration a little better, but at least it was consistent to begin with.
  • Noddy is told to nurse your cold (a common saying) but it becomes look after that cold which I’m not sure is a saying at all. You might look after a broken leg, I suppose, but probably not a cold.

Words are removed

  • When Noddy threatens to tell Mr Noah of you [the elephant], the of you is missing.
  • Also, it was really a horrid drive loses the really.

Whole lines are rewritten

  •  Noddy got some more toy bricks when he saved a little money and went to fetch them in a box to When Noddy had saved a little money he went and got some more toy bricks in a box. I agree the second version is a little clearer but not enough to justify a rewrite.
  • I think we can all see why Else I would be feeling a lot of pricks would be changed, and it is rewritten as or these prickles would be hurting me. I don’t see why it couldn’t just have been prickles replacing pricks.
  • The farmer had offered Noddy eggs to show you I’m sorry for my goat butting you. This has become to make up for my goat butting you. Why can’t he be sorry?
  • Noddy no longer asks Mr Noah to spank the naughty elephant. Instead he asks for him to be given a telling off. As usual the makes it seem like the elephant is over-reacting. A telling off is not that bad a threat!

Punctuation is changed a few times

  • Originally it is a pond and a farm-house, and sheds, and fences. It is a little awkward but the new version – a pond and a farm house and sheds and fences is even worse.
  • Three times a comma is inserted into very very, as in a very(,) very good idea.

One correction is made

  • Its is corrected to it’s, as it is clearly in place of it is.

One mistake has crept in

  • Wound him up (as in a clockwork clown with a key) is now would him up.

AND THEN THE LARGER CHANGES

The golliwogs in the story have been replaced with goblins:

  • Therefore when talking to a goblin he no longer says there might be bad goblins about. (That would be tactless). Instead he says it’s rather frightening there. 
  • He was so black Noddy couldn’t see him, and bumped into him when he walked out to find him naturally has to change to fit the new character of the goblin. Two sentences are rewritten to it was so dark that Noddy couldn’t see him at all. Then Noddy took a step forward and bumped straight into him. It could easily have been left at changing He was so black to It was so dark. 
  • The golliwogs’ black faces become ugly faces.
  • Golliwogs for some reason become goblin, singular, at one point.
  • Four big strong golliwogs become four wicked goblins.

Those aren’t all the updated illustrations as the gollies appeared in quite a few, but hopefully they show enough.

An entire paragraph is rewritten:

And now look at them both, having their party! Noddy had got his clothes back again, and his bell is jingling. Big-Ears is cutting his fourth slice of cake. The little car is safely in its garage again. Big Ears waved the cake-knife in the air and began a happy song.

And so they did. Big-Ears came back and gave Noddy all his clothes again. He drove the little car safely back into its garage, and then they both had a big slice of cake. Big-Ears waved the cake knife in the air and began a happy song.

This seems to serve two purposes. One is to stop it being another of Blyton’s direct speeches to the reader though there are plenty throughout the book (isn’t Noddy’s house lovely… look at the flowers outside… etc). The second is to tell us that Big Ears did the things Noddy asked of him, as if we couldn’t assume he had before the party started.

And lastly, Noddy’s final song is cut:

When you’re feeling very gay,
And you shout hip-hip-hurray,
Hey-derry-ho-derry,
What a happy day!

Two illustrations are changed (beyond replacing the gollies with goblins):


Well, gosh. I make that 39 changes this time. Not as many as Noddy and his Car (47) but respectable all the same.

 

Posted in Updating Blyton's Books | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Famous Five 90s Style: Five on Finniston Farm

five on finniston farmFive on Finniston Farm has to be one of my all time favourite adaptations in this TV series. It is possibly because I watched it when I was younger, and had the video on permanent loan from the library (my mum worked there).

I’ts a strangely compelling adaptation in my nostalgic opinion, and sticks quite closely to the book.

Ironically, one of the only significant deviations from the book is the start of the episode. It starts with a flashback of the castle when it wasn’t in ruins with the lady of the manor trying to hide her children from the angry peasants. This adds a nice historical touch to the episode, giving us an insight to what is going to happen, and what the episode will be exploring.

The rest of the changes are superficial, and really didn’t need to be done, except for the time constraints put on the team for having a 25 minute episode. As we’ve discussed before the 25 minute time limit does no favours for the playing out of Blyton’s compelling stories.  One fairly big change is a swapping of surnames; the one remaining Finniston, who was a descendant of the castle has been written out, and the family who own the farm – originally the Philpots – have been given the surname instead. With the writing out a fairly light character, as well as the gossipy woman who runs the cafe, general store and post office (and her equally talkative daughter Janie) we lose some charming interaction. We also miss out on some wonderful facts about macaroons, and how there were 24 on a plate, and the hilarious scenes of Timmy chasing his ice cream around the floor. Once again these are superficial really and anyone who had not read the book wouldn’t know what was lost, but for us aficionados, the loss of these few precious parts cuts deeply.

The Philpots/Finnistons’ old Granddad takes an additional role  of an antique dealer (formerly Mr Finniston), and still plays the wonderful role of a grumpy patriarch of the farm. He deals harshly and firmly with the Hennings and his own family up to a point. He takes a shine to Anne and tells her that she is a marvel, helping with all the house work and the cooking. She takes a shine to him and they talk about needing a miracle to save the farm. Walter Sparrow portrayed old Granddad and even though he did a fantastic job, the one thing between him and the book description of Grandad that let it down was the lack of distinctive long white beard. That was a little bit of magic lost for me.

Surprisingly the interaction between the key four was seamless in this episode. I’m sure if I worked it out I could tell you how long they had been together at this point. Marco Williamson’s interpretation of Julian wasn’t over the top in this one and Paul Child had the funny side of Dick down to a T. Jemima Rooper was as marvellous as always playing the perfect George, who has gotten over her jealousy of other tom boys as the Philpot/Finnistons’ only girl, Harriet, was dressed like her twin brother Harry and they couldn’t be told apart. Laura Petela was perfect as Anne, shy and kind, bringing out the best of old Granddad, even though her Anne was too scared to explore the hidden passage that the Five and the Harries discovered.

The Harries unfortunately looked nothing alike, although the book specified quite seriously that even though one was a boy and one was a girl, they looked absolutely alike. I know that realistically that would have been hard to find, but they could have gotten a little closer than Leanne Rowe (someone who causes me major hair envy, and I would love to meet!) and Greg Bradley, whom it appears hasn’t acted since Five on Finniston Farm. They worked well together as the sulky twins but when they started talking to the Five, they had less and less scenes as the original Five took over. Still, I think they did a good job and worked well together, perfecting the feel of the ‘twinniest twins I’ve ever seen’.

I haven’t said a word about our bad guys yet and I suppose I should really move on to that now. Richard Claxton who played the spoilt American, Junior, was really quite brilliant at being annoying and whiny as Junior is supposed to be. He wasn’t brilliant at sneaking up on the Five and the twins but I suspect that it was more for camera’s benefit than those of us who know the story. Peter Banks as Mr Henning is bumbling and bluffing enough but in fact it was one of those roles that could have done with a bit more being thrown at you. Saying that, he wasn’t playing the overtly comic villain which is why this episode has another point for it, the villains have more of a ruthless streak and are more believeable as tricksters and villains. Lastly we have Robin Hooper as Mr Durleston, who is perfect for the greedy, underhanded antiques dealer, although not quite the wilting flower we have in the books. Again, there is little over acting here which helps make him believable as a horrid person out for all he can get.

I’m sure you can now see why this episode comes together as one of my favourites. Its true to the story as far as 25 minutes can allow and the characters are played almost perfectly, and the villains are not our usual standard of comedic bumbling fools. We don’t see this villainy again until Five Have a Mystery to Solve and get stuck on Whispering Island.

I suggest you see this episode if you haven’t already (it can be found on YouTube) and let me know what you think!

 

Posted in Blyton on Screen | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Monday

Trying to get back on track this week, here’s our schedule:

Ristorante4

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Looking at The Famous Five Annual 2016, part 1

In what has become an ‘annual’ tradition I will look at the current year’s annual in two parts. (Apologies for the bad pun.)

You can see my review of the first annual from 2014 here and here, and then the 2015 one here and here.


So this year’s annual fits perfectly with the previous two. The cover this time is from Five on Finniston Farm. It’s a much closer up view this time, and there’s no background unlike on the other two annuals.

The content list looks interesting as always, nicely fitted onto an illustration from Five Go Down to the Sea.

DSCN4410


THE FAMOUS FIVE AND ME

Our first article is a slightly unusual one – as it’s a personal piece. It is by ‘a fan and author’ called Hilary McKay (someone I’ve never heard of). I found this quite hard to read and understand thanks to the (endless) sets of brackets, LOTS OF SHOUTING CAPITALS and lots of short sentences. Lots. Of. Them. At the end it tells us that Hilary McKay has a new book out now, and hardly surprisingly it turns out to be published by Hodder. Oh – and it is “perfect for fans of Enid Blyton’s family stories”. Imagine that.


THE FAMOUS FIVE PLAY

This is all about the first Famous Five Play from 1955. It gets four pages and it’s a very interesting read as it covers the play from when Blyton first announced it in her magazine to its second run in 1956. I was aware of the play but I didn’t know the first run was an evening performance (very grown up as Blyton notes) with a Noddy matinee in the afternoons. Nor did I know that Ronny Corbett performed in both!

DSCN4411


CAVES, SECRET PASSAGES AND TUNNELS

This is the sort of thing that makes me annoyed. (We all remember how much I hated Eva Rice’s book, yes?) We have a two page spread dedicated to underground features of the books (but not dungeons, fair enough) and it is woefully incomplete. They do know that though, and ask “have we missed any other(s)?.. There are dozens.” In a word, yes. They have included the Kirrin Island cave, the caves on Mystery Moor, The Billycock Hill Caves, The Wreckers’ Caves at Demon’s Rocks, the catacombs under Smuggler’s Top, the passage from Kirrin Island to Kirrin Quarry, (which is badly explained as leading from the fireplace into some caves then to the tunnel, when really it forms part of the dungeons – remember they knew there were two entrances to the dungeons but could only find the one under the large stone in the courtyard), and finally the passage in the thick walls of Faynights Castle.

So what’s missing, they ask? The vast caves in the hill above Merran Lake, the passage from Uncle Quentin’s study to the bedroom at Kirrin Farmhouse, the passage through the cliffs to Red Tower’s house, the cave system near the Roman dig on Kirrin Common, the underground tunnels in Magga Glen and the passage that led from Finniston Castle to the nearby chapel. So just a few, then!


TWO FAMOUS PASTIMES

Camping and Caravanning. Again I don’t think this is in any way complete. There’s no mention of them camping in the book with Camp in the title for a start!


WELL DONE, FAMOUS FIVE

I made notes on paper when I read the annual and the first thing I jotted was hideous. Extremely modern illustrations (possibly Jamie Littler’s?) and lovely updates like idiot for ass, and binoculars for field glasses. Worst of all it’s only a taster of what was already a very short story. If you want to know the rest you’d better get out and buy the relevant Hodder Colour Reader!

DSCN4412


WHICH FAMOUS FIVE BOOK SHOULD I READ NEXT?

A short quiz to help you decide (if you’re not the sort to insist on reading them in order).


FINNISTON FARM REVISITED

This is about the illustrations as there are two shown which Eileen Soper reworked (at Blyton’s instruction).

DSCN4413


A FAMOUS FIVE GAME

Taken from the back endpapers of Enid Blyton’s Magazine Annual No 1. It has been made larger which is nice, would make it easier to play!

DSCN4421


THE FAMOUS FIVE MUSICAL

Information on the musical mentioned in the earlier section about the play. The musical (which I’m sure I’ve seen on DVD) was performed in 1996.

Bonus quiz: which actor from the photo went on to be part of a famous pop group?

Bonus quiz: which actor from the photo went on to be part of a famous pop group?


HAPPY CHRISTMAS, FIVE

Another extract, this one with the same strange illustrations from previous annuals (remember that bathing suit post?)

DSCN4418


WHAT’S WRONG?

Probably the least well-known of the three Pepys Famous Five games, this one asks you to spot the deliberate mistakes in some Eileen Soper illustrations. It is extremely hard! Thankfully the answers are given at the back of the annual.


And that’s the first half of the annual. I will leave the rest for another day.

I liked this title page as it looks like the children (and Aunt Fanny) are looking up at the title.

I liked this title page as it looks like the children (and Aunt Fanny) are looking up at the title.

Next post: Famous Five Annual 2016 part 2

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , , | 9 Comments

A Frosty Morning – A poem by Enid Blyton

Here is a very seasonally accurate poem by the grand woman herself.

A Frosty Morning

When the sun hangs low in the eastern sky,
Caught in the trees that shiver and shy,
Red as the robin that flits nearby,
Sing hey, for a frosty morning!

When the lane is a-glitter beneath our feet,
Powered with crystal, delicate, sweet,
And the quiet pond is a silver sheet,
Sing hey, for a frosty morning!

Come out, come out, while the sky is red,
Over the crunching fields to tread,
Ere the frost in the kindling sun lies dead,
Sing, hey for a frosty morning!

DSCN2202

Posted in Poetry | Tagged , | 6 Comments

Monday comes round again!

So here we are, another Monday, and we’re already in Feburary! How on Blyton did that happen?

Anyway I’ve had a weekend off, and one that has been most productive, as my bomb site of a room has been tidied somewhat. My parents helped and so has my other half, so I think I am on the way to becoming a more sane person (I think I can hear Fiona snorting! ;))

Onwards and upwards then, this week’s blogs will be as follows;

Wednesday: Stef’s Famous Five 90s Style of Five Go to Finniston Farm, one of my all time favourite episodes. Shall we see if my jaded eye can still see the magic in it?

Friday: Fiona will probably be providing us with a review of the 2016 Famous Five Annual that she got for Christmas. I say probably because at the time of typing, she had only suggested it. So we shall see and wait in impatience for the result.

There we are anyway, all sorted for the week even if we are being a bit topsy turvy with our blogging this week, with me going first.

I shall leave you with three of my favourite pictures that I took when I visited the national Trust Property, Cliveden in Buckinghamshire before Christmas, on a rare dry and sunny day! Enjoy!

DSC_0493DSC_0674DSC_0411

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Second Form at Malory Towers: Audio adaptation

hodder-second-form-at-malory-towersFollowing on from the review I did of  the First Term at Malory Towers audio before Christmas I finally caved and brought an downloadable version of The Second Form at Malory Towers because I couldn’t find my cassette tape.

Anyway, once I had downloaded all the technology, thanks to Amazon for making it a chore and a half, I was able to transport myself back to my childhood when this was the first Malory Towers I had encountered.

I knew there were books, but I was at the awkward stage where I wasn’t really reading but still liked stories. My parents allowed me to listen to cassette tapes in bed to go to sleep so they brought me some. I suspect that the only ones available at the time were Second Form, Third Year and Upper Fourth, because for a very long time that was all I believed existed of Malory Towers.

On to the point, we’re rushed very quickly through the introductions again, to Darrell heading back to school with Sally Hope, as the two have now become best friends. A rather quick introduction is standard really for the audios which only have an hour to play out everything. One thing I do like about this intro is that they equality of the driving situation between Darrell’s parents is highlighted. Its made clear that Mr Rivers does most of the driving but there is a nice point where, even in the book, Blyton has Mrs Rivers take the wheel of the car to relieve her husband. I do believe that Blyton herself loved going out in the motor car and I believe she could drive as well, which is why she felt it was appropriate to put into the book that Mrs Rivers could as well.

In rather quick succession when we arrive at Malory Towers we are introduced once more to all of the girls, some of them we never get told who they are which leaves us guessing and who have deliciously plummy accents. If you want proper English toffiness, this is the audio to listen to!

The new girls are also introduced very quickly and then each of them throughout the episode has a main part of the story but then go very quiet. As a purest, the fact that so much is left out of the dramatization is distressing because you pick up on bits that they have missed and add so much more depth to the story.

Its not a bad adaptation but hearing it read aloud as it were makes me annoyed at the girls’ immaturity in some cases, such as handling the problems with Ellen, but I have to remind myself that they are like 14 years old, and that I wasn’t very mature at that age. I also don’t like the way the mistresses seem to lack knowledge about what’s being said around the school and acting on the silly rumours. Malory Towers will always be my favourite place to want to go to school but I do think there are some holes somewhere in the lax teaching style when the girls are not in lessons!

Overall, even for the nostalgia kick, this is a better adaptation than the first, I think the cast probably were finding their feet more and gelling more. So overall, this is a pretty good one, apart from the gaps, but then as a perfectionist and purest I hope I can be forgiven for wanting the perfect recording?

Next review: Third Year at Malory Towers: Audio adaptation

Or read a review of the Second Form novel here.

Posted in Audio Books and Audio Dramatisations | Tagged , | 3 Comments

The Twins at St Clare’s – How has Blyton’s original text fared in a modern edition? part 3

I’m going to get back into this comparison after a bit of a break over Christmas and the new year. Previous posts are here and here.

I am comparing an Egmont paperback from 2005 (on loan from Stef) with a Methuen 6th impression from 1945.


CHAPTER SEVEN: JANET IS UP TO TRICKS

Not very much to report in this chapter. The school maids have become school messengers. Chorussed has been ‘corrected’ to chorused. The double-s spelling is marked as wrong in my spell checker but there are a lot of dictionary entries online for it. It may just be an out-dated spelling now. Also, when fire-cracks are first introduced to the chapter they are in inverted commas, which are removed in the newer edition. (They keep their hyphen, though!)


CHAPTER EIGHT: THE GREAT MIDNIGHT FEAST

There are several references to money in this chapter and naturally they have all been changed. Half a crown (two shillings and sixpence) has become a pound, and after that two shillings are also updated to a pound. A whole ten shillings becomes a whole ten pounds, and half a farthing (one eighth of an old penny) becomes fifty pence. So while those updates are not exactly logical, (if two and a half shillings = one decimal pound, how can ten shillings make ten pounds?) they at least make reasonable sense. It’s believable that a girl might be asked to put a pound in for a present for the head teacher, or that another girl would receive ten pounds from the granny on her birthday.

Other amounts of money are replaced with vague phrases – sixpence towards a charity becomes something, two shillings is the money, (requiring lost them to become lost it afterwards), and a ten shilling note is also referred to as the money. A shilling is some money, and my ten shilling note is my money. Again, as far as updates go, it makes sense to use terms like those rather than getting caught up in making sure amounts match up. But then again, they could have just left it in shillings and taught children a history lesson!

Anyway, moving on from money. A gold bar-brooch becomes just a gold brooch, a tuck-hamper a hamper and linoleum is now the floor. A Great feast is now a great feast (but later the Feast is still a Feast) and italics are lost when the twins wish Miss Roberts would respect us


Quite a few more than last time I think, mostly thanks to all those references to money. Seventeen changes in all (sticking to my rule of  counting new/unique alterations only) bringing us to a total of 45.

Posted in Updating Blyton's Books | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Missed Monday

So Fiona was supposed to bring the Monday blog this week, but as she has to be up obscenely early so she’s done the picture and didn’t manage to write up a blog, so I’m just going to put the picture up for her.

So here is what we have got for you this week!

^13F175013A1CF0E966C4BA4A1CD6462FD5D4B0D94A3B62038D^pimgpsh_fullsize_distr

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 1 Comment

What Blyton products we would like to see in 2016

After the joys of Christmas and the new year have left us and that January gloom has set in, let us get back to the consumerism that we’ve all been trying to avoid in the longest pay month in the calendar. So we’re going to have a look at what products that we would happily snap up if they were in production.

  1. The Blyton colouring book: Well in my case a Famous Five adult colouring book. As the adult colouring bookshave become such a Western phenomenon it would be amazing to see a book of Blyton’s illustrators works all ready and waiting for colouring. It would certainly fly off the shelves to our particular market. I mean who has never wanted to colour in one of Eileen Soper’s illustrations? I know I have!

    360wide+5354973

    Who wouldn’t want to colour in Julian threatening Mr Stick with a pie? One of Ju’s more likable moments for most people, would certainly be a colouring treat.

  2. The 90s Famous Five TV series on English DVDs with ALL the episodes: Well we know we can get them from Spain, Germany and Holland but the UK has yet to honour the 90s Famous Five with the same treatment as the 70s series received a few years ago. What would be nice if the 90s set could include interviews with the cast and crew, as well as all the behind the scenes footage that was recorded at the time. Some of this footage can be found on the German copies of the DVDs, but you get the feeling that there is some missing! Anyway, that’s high on my lists of ‘would like to sees’ as a 90s fan.
  3. New hardback editions with original texts and illustrations: What every collector craves, brand new, beautifully bound editions to go with our lovingly collected early editions. The proper illustrations and text in place, and un-touched by the censors. What could be nicer? Also given that there seems to be trend in republishing adult classic novels in lovely cloth bound editions, I don’t see why this isn’t possible for a classic children’s author.
    51BZ3Ioc4OL._SX258_BO1,204,203,200_
  4. A brand new TV series: Wouldn’t it be lovely if we had a brand new TV series, not something that has been done before, but another, the Five Find-Outers or Malory Towers. I would go for Malory Towers personally (and so would Fiona) and you could make them feature length and have all six years done. You get more scope from something like the Five Find Outers though as they have 15 adventures to get through! The only thing though is that as pureists we’d want them to be as close to the original books as possible wouldn’t we?(As a side note/Post Script; wouldn’t it be lovely if these Magic Faraway Tree Movies were to happen? We’ve been promised them for years and years and they’ve never materialized!)
    10704138_967295359951269_7270889575665595282_n
  5. The last thing I would like to see on this list would be favourite phrases, pictures, fan slogans (such as “team Julian”) printed on T-shirts and hoodies. You see a lot of that about these days, especially for big things like Harry Potter. There are tonnes of quotes and things Blyton fans could have on hoodies, jumpers, t-shirts etc. One of my favourite quotes is one from Five Get into Trouble where Julian confronts Hunchy. “You’re so sharp you’ll cut yourself!” says Hunchy. To which Julian replies, rather sassily, “So my mother told me when I was two!” In fact I might even have to design myself my very own “Team Julian” hoodie to keep me nice and warm. The other half might not be so impressed however.

    mr-harry-potter-tshirt

    An example of the kind of clothing line I’m talking about, taken from the Harry Potter fandom.

So anyway, those are my five things I would like to see from the Blyton estate this year, and you never know there may be more to come when I think of them, in fact I’ve already got a couple of ideas brewing. Let me know if there is anything else you’d like to see, and I’ll pop it in the next blog!

 

Posted in Purchases, Toys and Games | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Secret Series on TV – The Secret Island

Tonight I’ve sat down to watch the first episode of the Secret Series as adapted by Umbrella Entertainment in the 1990s. It should be an interesting experience as judging from the back of the box, the programme bears little resemblance to the original work. I warn you now this contains a lot of spoilers and is a very very long review.

IMG_4180


My first thoughts are that the theme tune is pretty awful. It’s very Home and Away/ Neighbours style. The words are something along the lines of  Secret encounteeeers. No one can find us we’re out on our own (secret encounters) can’t you see, that we’ll be, every hero, it’s great fantaseeee…” That last line doesn’t make an awful lot of sense but I went back and listened about four times and that’s what it sounds most like.

Anyway, music aside, we’ve got a very 90s setting for the story. (If you’ve seen Round the Twist you can imagine the look of things). There are three children, Peggy, Mike and Laura. I’m not sure why Nora got updated but Peggy didn’t. There’s no mention of Mike and Laura being twins. The children’s dad is going off sailing in his boat, accompanied by a woman called Charlotte who he doesn’t even know. She’s a photographer, though. Nanny Betts is going to look after the children in the mean time.


I HAVE MY PREDICTIONS…

At this point I had my guesses as to what would happen. Clearly dad’s going to get shipwrecked, but I had no idea how the children would end up running away. Nanny Betts seems too nice and the children seem happy being left with her.

Quite quickly my guess was proven right as a typhoon is on its way. There are several boat scenes up to and including the typhoon hitting before we find out what’s happening to the children. Nanny Betts has died! After being on screen for less than thirty seconds she’s fallen over and died.


LORD FOGGO, SCOOP MAGAZINE AND THADDEUS?
IS THIS EVEN STILL A BLYTON STORY?

Lord… something that sounds like Foggo, a posh English gentleman, then phones Scoop Magazine. Bear with me while I explain the ‘relevance’ of this. Lord Foggo wants to get a message to Thaddeus (yes, that’s the father’s name…) Arnold to tell him that Nanny Betts has died. (I’m not sure whether she’s his mother or the children’s mother – or indeed just an elderly relative and nothing is ever said about it, or indeed what happened to their mother). Anyway, the editor at the magazine is stunned. Why should be bother interrupting Thaddeus in a typhoon to tell him some old woman has died? Well, says Lord Foggo, the children are being sent off to stay with an aunt and uncle and they are a bad lot. In his words, the children are at risk. Editor man is unimpressed. He has an exclusive deal with Thaddeus and Charlotte, only he can talk to them and they to him but he promises to pass along the message should Thaddeus ring back after the weather settles.


AUNT HARRIET AND UNCLE HENRY

Naturally they are shipwrecked before such a call can be made, not that it would have made any difference. The aunt and uncle come to collect the children and are fairly unsympathetic about Nanny dying (I can only assume she was the mother’s relative otherwise Aunt Harriet would be related to her too) despite the fact the hearse is pulling away from the house at the time. Aunt Harriet is at least kind enough to say they can go to the funeral, while Uncle Henry is more concerned with telling the children their father is very dead.

Mike, in a thick and barely understandable accent, denies this on the grounds that Laura has a feeling about these things, sooo theeere. Now that we’re on slightly more familiar ground I am desperately hoping that I can find enough familiarness to actually enjoy the episode, despite the obvious glaring differences between 90s New Zealand and 40s England.

Quickly we find out that Uncle Henry wants to sell “Peep Holes” which must be the children’s home (a very large house near the sea). I wonder if that will somehow tie into The Secret of Spiggy Holes, should that be the next episode.

We also meet Jack, or at least see him sneaking about and spying on the children. There’s a dog on the farm who isn’t allowed in the house, so Laura gets into trouble when he runs in. She also gets scolded for knocking over a bucket of water while cleaning the floor and is sent to bed after she mops up. The other children are also sent to bed, without supper – though it’s broad daylight outside.

Whereas in the book we come to the children well settled in their new lives the TV episode takes great pains to show us the whole story leading there. Unfortunately it is still rushed and Aunt Harriet and Uncle Henry mostly come across as crotchety and out of touch rather than truly negligent. (One of the children’s biggest complaints is that the food is greasy and fatty.)

The aunt and uncle are scheming meanwhile – launching a lengthy and convoluted side plot which doesn’t really add much to the story. If I have it straight, they want the court to presume Thaddeus dead. That way they can be declared guardians of the children and therefore sell the house. With the money they can then buy Old Luke’s farm. (Old Luke being Jack’s grandad).

The children maintain that their dad is alive – the proof being that Laura has seen him in her dreams. Both Laura and Mike are very whiny throughout, and not particularly likeable. Peggy as the older sibling is somewhat more likeable as she tries to look after the other two, though she has her stroppy moments too.

Jack (who they have never met before this point) warns the children about the plot to sell their house. He reveals he will run away to “his secret place” should his grandad sell the farm. Immediately the children “wish they could come too” and begin begging.


SUDDEN PLANS ARE MADE

It’s all quite unbelievable at this stage. They don’t have the happiest of lives at the farm but they aren’t treated half as badly as the Arnold children of the book. They don’t know Jack at all, they only met him thirty seconds ago and suddenly they want to go to his  mystery secret place.

Anyway, as if to add impetus to their need to run away Uncle Henry says he is going to put the dog down as he’s a poor worker. The children tell their uncle to his face that they hate him. They then rescue the dog and send him to Jack, their mind made up to run away.

SERET SERIES ON TV


THE NOT-SO-SECRET ISLAND

The secret place is revealed as an island, about twenty feet from the shore and clearly visible from a long way off. It’s set that they will go on Saturday night as aunt and uncle always go out then. They pack up blankets, candles and what tinned food they can find but aunt and uncle decide not to go out after all. Aunt Harriet discovers the larder is bare and, after quizzing Peggy, decides to blame Jack then goes off out with Uncle Henry after all.

Clearly it was an attempt to add drama, Jack nearly going without them as they are late, but in comparison to the book it all seems silly. They make it to the lake anyway, and after donning the life jackets head to the island.


THE MAD MONK AND DESERT ISLAND LIVING

Now for the strange bit. Before the episode started there was a very brief scene with a figure in a monk’s robe moving through a cave or tunnel towards a red light. I assumed it was to do with the production company whose logo came up afterwards and dismissed it from my mind. Yet when the children reach the island there is, lo and behold, a robed figure watching them!

We then flash over to Thaddeus and Charlotte again and get various bits of them surviving on their desert island. There is enough arguing between them to suggest they are going to be love interests in the future.

The children’s island is known as “haunted island” (and is nowhere near as secret as they think) according to Old Luke. The story goes that a mad old monk was marooned there a long time ago and then just disappeared. The police turn up at the farm to ‘investigate’ the children’s disappearance and are told they are off camping with cousin George. Who reported them missing isn’t specified.

The children make a trip back to the farm to get bread and other supplies and Uncle Henry assumes at first that it was those “darn gypsies”. Aunt Harriet wonders if it wasn’t the children and eventually admits the truth to the police that the children have run away. A helicopter is sent out searching for them with no luck.


I LOST THE PLOT…

I admit around this stage my attention wandered. The children planned to make a house and I did perk up, thinking of willow house. Unfortunately they decided to camp in an old hut instead.

More is made of the newspaper having some sort of contract, an exclusive one with the children and or Uncle Henry… I couldn’t really figure that out. Also incomprehensibly a new character by the name of Tom appears on this SECRET island, he’s a gypsy kid who often comes over to fish and catch rabbits.


ADDED DRAMA

Borrowing from Scooby Doo and The Goonies to name a couple of examples Laura falls and breaks her glasses and can’t see a thing without them. Then in Lassie style Prince (the dog) runs off to the others to convey Laura’s distress in a few succinct barks. Her spare glasses are at the farm, thus necessitating another trip there in the night.

Uncle Henry has installed what I thought was an electric fence around the farm, but it turns out to be a sensor wire for an alarm system. It all becomes very high drama as Peggy and Jack (yes, they let the girl go!) set off the alarm deliberately to lure Uncle Henry and Aunt Harriet outside so they can sneak inside to get the glasses.

Back on the island the monk shows himself to Laura and Mike and turns out to be a harmless old man. He’s not a mad monk (apparently) but a warden of a former owl sanctuary that has closed down. He couldn’t leave the birdS so stayed on the island, hidden in the caves. He couldn’t tell anyone as he didn’t have planning permission for the hut/cave dwelling.

The monk/owl warden listens to the children’s story and says, quite casually, that he can find their father. He’s sure he can get a fix on Thaddeus’ waterproof mobile phone, if only the children can remember the number.

While they are straining their minds to remember (oh the tension!) Old Luke and Uncle Henry come to search the island. They are scared off by a sneeze and some whistling the children do in the caves.

Again my attention wandered but all of a sudden Laura is unwell and the boys go off in the boat to get her medicine. The monk says the best medicine would be finding her father and so fires up his wireless radio set and gets to work radioing random boats on the ocean. Apparently there are language barriers and a poor signal but he’s a determined chap.

The boys have sold blackberries to get money for the medicine, or so they say, but Old Luke spots them at the chemists and calls the police (he’s after the reward offered by Uncle Henry). The police chase them across fields and into a tiny gypsy camp. They aren’t found despite the police looking right into the van they climb into, and Tom tells them that the boys went that way. Old Luke turns up as they climb back out of the vehicle and summon the police back.

Laura has another psychic flash and declares their dream is all over moments before the boys show up with the police in tow. And then dad’s waiting at home for them when they return with no explanation whatsoever, around half an hour after the monk started searching for him.


MY THOUGHTS

I don’t know where to start with the ridiculousness of the whole thing. It has only the slightest resemblance to the original story. Instead of being a story about four children surviving on an island, developing skills and growing as people, we get a whole lot of nonsense. The children are whiny and hopeless from start to finish. While the monk adds a level of creepiness to the tale it’s entirely unnecessary, the fear should have come from the idea that they might be found and returned to an abusive home. There’s tension galore in the book – the trippers, the island being searched, Jack hiding in the hen-house when the police man spots him. It didn’t need a silly ghost story. The explanation given for who the monk really was is utterly ludicrous – it would have been better if they’d left it a mystery!

Don’t get me started on an owl warden being able to track down a missing man on a deserted island. If it was that easy he wouldn’t be lost! I also don’t think that it was necessary to show Thaddeus and Charlotte on their island. It entirely ruins the ending of him turning up again. I sometimes cry at the end of the book – when Jack rushes to the hotel, heart in mouth, to find the Arnolds. And then they are reunited with their children who are overjoyed, yet sad to leave their beloved island. Come the end of the TV episode I rather went “Eh? How did they find him?” followed by “I’m so glad that’s all over.”

While the main flaw of the 90s and 70s Famous Five series is that they tried to squash an entire book into 25 minutes, and therefore had to cut a lot of good scenes. The main flaw of the Secret Island is they tried to make a 90 minute episode using around ten minutes of the book and eighty minutes of rubbish they wrote themselves.

The joys of the book which came from the careful planning of running away, building willow house, bringing Daisy over, making the island a comfortable and (as far as possible) a sustainable home are utterly absent. The closest we get to a plan for not being found is pushing the boat into reeds and covering their footprints with leaves. They’re barely only island a few weeks it would seem, perhaps that’s why Laura had to break her glasses to necessitate another trip to the farm.

I don’t know if I can bear to watch the next episode(s) now.

Posted in Blyton on Screen | Tagged , , | 10 Comments

Monday round up

We’ve had a busy week this week, blogging away and the reward has been a surge in views! People are hopefully rediscovering us after their Christmas break.

This week Fiona will be bringing you a review of the Secret Series TV programme which she got for her birthday? Christmas? I think it was birthday — I am sure she will correct me — and on Wednesday and I shall try to bring you something interesting!

Unfortunately the blog I was planning to do, hasn’t really got much past the development stage. I think I need to sit down and brain storm it a bit more before I write it. I may however choose to do a review of the Second Term at Malory Towers audio adaptation for you, which I’ve kept you waiting for since before Christmas.

Anyway, with that said, I don’t think there is anymore news, so I shall leave you with some photos I took of the university gardens back in October. I’m rather proud of these ones, especially the close ups as I’m still getting to grips with my new DLSR. Hope you like them!

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 3 Comments