Welcome to Monday

Hope you’ve all had a good weekend –  hasn’t the English weather been glorious (especially in the south) this weekend? I’ve been out and got myself a little tan, and all my freckles are finding their way out!

Anyway the blogs for this week are a look at The Ring O’ Bells Mystery from Fiona to go with the rest of her Barney series reviews, we have a reblog to do for you from a fan who emailed us last week, which we are looking forward to, and I think I am going to try a recipe for seed cake that I found at work. I’m pretty certain that seed cake was mentioned in one of Blyton’s books, somewhere!

Hope you’re up for a smashing blog week! I shall leave you with some of my favourite pictures from last week, which I do admit mostly includes bluebells. Hope you love them as much as I do!

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

The River of Adventure

I know it’s been a while since I have reviewed any of the Adventure Series books but I know where I got up to, and that was River. So without waiting another second it’s time to have a look at the final Adventure series book and find out what trouble Philip, Jack, Dinah and Lucy-Ann get up to.

I think its fair to say that River of Adventure is possibly one of the weaker books of the series, and in the same vein as Five are Together Again, it tends to be the least favourite of the fans. The plot does tend to feel like a mash up of previous ones, the children being unable to go back to school, the unexpected trip out of town with Bill and in this case Aunt Allie, the bad guy is searching for an underground treasure and the adults are conveniently captured so the children can go on and find the treasure trove by accident.

It’s a fairly standard end of the line plot really, it is as if Blyton couldn’t find an further ways to grow her characters and find new adventures for them. I’m a bit hazy on her personal timeline but a quick check on the Enid Blyton Society website tells me that it could be understandable that Blyton was a bit distracted at this time as she was having to start legal proceedings to stop the rumours that she didn’t write her own books. In that instance we could probably forgive her for being a little less absorbed in coming up with adventures for her books.

Anyway back to the adventure; the whole reason for the children being anywhere near this middle eastern ‘river of adventure’ is because of Bill and his work. He is tracking someone called Raya Uma who is a jack of all trades as far as criminal business is concerned and is after some highly valuable treasure that is apparently hidden in the desert. Bill takes his wife and the children for his cover, to appear to be a family man on holiday while doing all he can to catch Raya Uma. However as I’m sure you can guess, best laid plans and all that, it all goes wrong for Bill and Aunt Allie as they’re kidnapped by Raya Uma and his men.

The children then ally themselves with the boat driver and a young boy from the local ‘sinny-town’ (Cinema town, you know a big fake place like on a Hollywood movie set?). During this excitement Philip ends up with a poisonous snake that has had its venom ducts removed which means it is essentially harmless, and avid readers of the book will know that the snake does save the day.

However back to the plot. I must admit I didn’t ‘gel’ with it, it was very sporadic when moving from scene to scene and although it had been touched by Blyton’s magic, the fact that once again the children had managed to find undiscovered treasure had lost its shine by this point. The plot is overused and sloppy in places, the motions are just that, motions. There is nothing new to surprise the reader, especially if they have read all the others. As usual I may be being too hard on it as its a children’s book and I am an adult (how I hate admitting that), but I think even as a child I knew when a book didn’t quite fit in. I knew that Five as Together Again was not as strong and instead was quite boring compared to the others, and its the same with The River of Adventure.

However I know that any book written by Blyton has a magic about it, and that’s not to say it’s well written but it just doesn’t sparkle as much as the others. You may disagree with me, and you may like to fill me in on what I am missing! I just think that the last book of Blyton’s series are the ones that suffer most from over used plot lines and predictability.

One last point on River of Adventure is that if you look at the first editions or at least those published before 1953 Kiki, our favourite parrot, would screech “God save the King” quite happily. In River this changes to “God save the Queen” as it was two years since Queen Elizabeth the second had been crowned and the phrase was changed to fit into the times. However I’m not too sure how well you could convince a parrot like Kiki to change her favourite saying, but if anyone could it would be Jack and Philip.

So there you are, those are my thoughts on the River of Adventure. What do you think? Do you agree with me or not? Let us know in the comments or write us a blog saying why not!

First edition dustjacket

Fiona has also reviewed this series, starting here.

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

My twenty-second Noddy book: Cheer Up Little Noddy

This Noddy book has been the hardest to review. It was supposed to be my 18th review from the series, but when I opened my copy I discovered that it was missing the first 20 pages. I then added a copy from eBay to my Christmas list, and my mum bought me it. Unfortunately, it turned out to be the cover from Cheer Up Little Noddy… and the contents of Noddy Goes to Sea! The copy I’m finally going to review came all the way from Alton and was bought for me by Stef. Needless to say I asked her if it had all pages and matching contents and cover before I let her part with any money!

520wide+6530027


THE STORY

Noddy’s day starts with washing his car, but right away you could see trouble was coming.

Little Tubby Bear and Tommy Bear are watching and admiring his car and Tommy Bear says he can drive. Uh-oh. Noddy is silly enough to let them sit in his car. Double uh-oh.

Naturally, being naughty teddies they drive off in his car and it ends up smashed to pieces. For once, a catastrophe has occurred that isn’t truly Noddy’s fault and everyone is very sympathetic. Mr Golly takes the car for repair and various toys come to visit Noddy with jam tarts and chocolates.

Little Tubby has been spanked by his parents for his behaviour and is to give up what is in his piggy bank towards the repairs. Tommy Bear has run off. (No-one seems to be particularly concerned about a missing child, or a case of grand theft auto, however.)

Noddy’s plan (conceived with Big Ears who is a much brainier chap) is to barrow a borrow…  no, morrow a barrow tomarrow… um, temporarily use a wheeled box to ferry shopping and things for people at sixpence a go.

In a place like Toy Village this sort of venture can only be a success. Toys always have a spare sixpence for someone else to do a boring or time-consuming chore for them. I actually wonder how anyone manages to catch a train or get their shopping home when Noddy’s on holiday or on a day off or without his car for whatever reason. Despite there being enough traffic for Mr Plod to have to control it nobody else (or at least none of the regular characters) seem to own any sort of vehicle. And I’m looking too deeply into a fantasy toy-world created for small children, I know that.

Anyway, the barrow-jobs turn out to be hard-going on Noddy due to lots of heavy loads. He upgrades to a hand-cart after a day or two, but even then he’s tired out as everyone is giving him jobs as they think it’s helpful. Big Ears thinks about getting a horse to help, only he doesn’t know anyone with a horse… And straight away a travelling saucepan sales man comes along, with a donkey.


NODDY AND THE SAUCEPAN MAN

As happens fairly often with Blyton, this is a little cross-over, or cameo if you will. Big-Ears calls him the Old Saucepan Man, and he wears a saucepan on his head. The constant clattering of the pots and pans has made him quite deaf as well. I’ve not got around to reading the Enchanted Wood/Faraway Tree books yet but even I know that this is the same Saucepan Man that appears there.

DSCN4906

All too conveniently the Saucepan Man is looking for someone to look after Ee-Aw his donkey while he goes off visiting his aunt, Katie Kettle. Despite having thought about getting Noddy a horse not two pages ago, Big-Ears is outraged. He has no where to keep a donkey! It takes until the Saucepan Man has gone off in a huff before he thinks to let Noddy have the donkey and solve two problems at once.

Not much really happens after that. Noddy goes back to working, using Ee-Aw to pull the cart, and apart from one upset when Bumpy-Dog send Ee-Aw running off, it goes well. Saucepan Man then comes back for Ee-Aw unexpectedly early, but it’s fine as Noddy’s car is repaired and life can go back to normal.

Tommy Bear never turns up again, incidentally.


After waiting so long to read this, it turned out to be a bit of a disappointment.

 

 

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , | 2 Comments

First Monday of May

It’s May now, not that the recent weather would lead you to believe that. For me the last week of April was not a case of April Showers. It was a case of repeated hail showers and then a reasonably heavy snow fall. I can only hope spring returns with May!

Anyway, at least the weather won’t stop us blogging.

Wednesday4 (2)

Thanks to Stef I have now acquired two of the three Noddy books I was missing, so I can return to reviewing them now, while Stef is going to finish the Adventure Series and we have a reblog on Sunday all the way from The Netherlands.

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Last Term at Malory Towers: Audio Adaptation

So here we are at the last audio adaptation of Malory Towers. Its been a rather short run of these audio comparisons but with only six volumes in the series, how could we expect more? Maybe I shall have to bite my tongue and read the Pamela Cox continuation novels and bring you some reviews of those. Anyway, on to the actual adaptation.

The introduction of the last term begins with Darrell at home, just about to leave for Malory Towers for the last time. She runs out to the car where her father is waiting impatiently for his daughters to appear.This is the first time we actually hear her father speak, and her mother is absent. In the books, both parents and Sally join Darrell and Felicity in the car to Malory Towers. I suppose that because she doesn’t say much that for the audio adaptation to keep to time it is just as simple to leave her out altogether than to squeeze her in.

The journey to Malory Towers is short and bittersweet because we all know this is the last one but even before we arrive at the wonderful world of Malory Towers we are being introduced to more new characters. In the last term there is a focus on the younger girls who can still get up to lots of mischief where the older girls, Darrell etc, can’t. Felicity and her friends in the second form make up the focus of a lot of the book. The character we’re introduced to in the beginning of the Last Term is someone called Josephine Jones. It seems that the girls in the car are all aware of her and she has been at Malory Towers for at least one term. Jo, as she’s usually called, has an appalling father and a very high opinion of herself which later on becomes her downfall.

One of the issues with Jo’s story is that when it comes to the money aspect of it (her parents are very wealthy) the PC brigade has been in and decided that they need to change five pounds in old money into ten pounds sterling as it’s assumed the listeners will not realise the time in which the story is set and have no idea of the currency change. As a purist it is these kinds of changes that make some the magic disappear from Blyton’s novels. The assumption that children wouldn’t think that five whole pounds was a lot of money is ridiculous. When I was the right age for these five pounds felt like a fortune, and all right when I was eight or so five pounds could get you a lot more, so much more that Jo’s ten pounds felt like a fortune! What really is the need for that sort of change? It’s just pedantic.

The next thing I want to talk about it the complete removal of a character from the adaptation. In the adaptation there is one new girl, the sports loving Amanda Chartlow (or Shoutalot, if you’re Mam’zelle Dupont) who plays a big part in the story, especially in regards to the second form and the bumptious June’s wake up call to stop just being the class clown. However in the book there are two new girls in the sixth form, one of them being Mam’zelle Rougier’s niece Suzanne who has come all the way from France to learn some English customs. Although Suzanne does not add much plot to the book, she is in a way the comic relief, and is another link to the second form as she adores the tricks they play on the Mam’zelles.

In regards to Amanda Chartlow, who is superb at games from a famous games school, her parts are mostly still intact. However there are some big jumps in her storyline with Alicia’s cousin June, such as the conversation where Amanda offers to coach June in tnnis and swimming, but it is more or less all there. Amanda is a very dominating character and although it comes through in the audio, it is very much lacking in line with the book.

When the audio starts drawing to the end, we don’t really get the full whack of feeling that Darrell’s leaving causes us in the book; the sombre walk around the school, having to say goodbye to everything and making Felicity promise to carry the standard high. Its a very touching part of the book, and really its lost in the audio where this part is cut out in favour of instrumental music.

It’s not the best Malory Towers adaptation, that probably has to go to the fifth, but its good because in a way there isn’t much from the book it doesn’t cover, the change in money is annoying to those of us in the know, and the exclusion of Suzanne is just frankly ridiculous when you could have cut some of the time from the instrumental music to fill in those parts. As always it’s little things, but if they get children wanting to read the books, well then, that’s the best we can hope for.

I will say however, even though I’ve been looking at these critically they are still full of nostalgia for me, and they do just confirm my love for Malory Towers. Oh how I wish I had been to that school! Long live Malory Towers!

620wide+7874851

This is the last book in the series so there is no ‘next review’ but you can read a review of the Last Term novel here.

Posted in Audio Books and Audio Dramatisations | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

The Secret Series on TV – Moon Castle

The previous episode went for a very modern sci-fi feel, which was miles away from the original story. This time around they seem to have gone for a ghostly one, which doesn’t sound all that far from the book, but manages to be entirely different all the same.

It actually reminds me of a couple of Murder She Wrote episodes, namely A Killing In Cork and Nan’s Ghost. That would be partially down to the location – which just so happens to be Ireland… yes, Ireland. I think I’d better go back to the beginning, hadn’t I?


THE OPENING SCENE

Charlotte is to visit and write about some Irish castles and so invited the Arnold crew plus Ruby along. (Why four children of that age need a nanny when they are travelling with their father and another adult is not clear.)

Castle #1 on the list just so happens to be Caislean Geall. Sorry, I mean Moon Castle, though both names are on the sign. Caislean, as I imagined, means castle, but geall seems to mean pledge or wager. Google Translate tells me that the Irish for moon is, er, moon, but elsewhere I’m seeing it as gealach or gealai so geall isn’t far from that.

Castle Wager/ Moon Castle is set up as being haunted by the opening scene with a ghostly horseman (and random drunk shouting SEAMMMUUSSSS!) It is also surrounded by what looks like the bog of eternal stench, but is later revealed to be a mostly harmless peat-bog.

The not-headless horseman

The not-headless horseman


THE O’MOONS?

A chap who I assumed to be Guy Brimming is angry with a woman I took to be Mrs Brimming, the caretaker. He is furious that she has advertised the castle for rent, but she argues that it will be fine. She’s lonely there as not a soul ever visits. This is in opposition to the book, where Mrs B (and her two sisters) as well as Guy don’t want anyone in the castle.

As it turns out these two are actually Mrs (or Ma) O’Moon and Fin O’Moon. Because you’re not Irish enough without an O in front of your name! They are the same characters though, just re-named. They must own the castle, as their ancestor Fin Bar O’Moon is mentioned a lot. Mrs O is dressed up like a vampire practically, I just have to add that.

mrsomoon

Mrs O’Moon

Fin is still a mad scientist type, but he seems to be working alone to produce a ‘magic potion’ – I kid you not, those are the words used. The cat laps some up and leaps from the top of the tower without injury, so we’re definitely into something weird.


TWANG, DONG, PLINK AND HONK

That unsettles the Arnolds as they arrive, especially Laura who thinks the castle doesn’t want them there. Unsurprisingly she is the one to harp on about ghosts the whole time. It doesn’t help that for the majority of the episode she is the only one to see green eyes lighting up in the portrait or the ghostly horseman outside. Though she says “it looked at me,” instead of “a green light shone from the eyes” so everyone thinks she’s just being silly.

Lots of weird things do happen, though, sort of like in the book. Suits of armour fall over. The musical instruments do indeed go TWANG and DONG, but also PLINK and HONK. It’s so terrifying that Ruby manages to fall down some stairs and hurts her knee. That’s the perfect excuse for Mrs O to give her some of the magic, (sometimes smoking), luminous green potion. Ruby not only thinks that’s entirely normal but also quite delicious.

Here, have some lovely green juice.

Here, have some lovely green juice.

Unfortunately for Ruby it only serves to make her battier than ever – she has extreme amounts of energy and almost flies over the bog, then later nearly dances off a cliff.

Back to the ‘weird things’ though, and lots of the Arnolds’ things go missing. A cassette player, a teddy, a cardigan, socks… Laura naturally blames the ghost. There are mini-earthquakes that send books flying from the shelves.

Mrs O blames pretty much everything on the castle being built on a bog. IT’S THE SUBSIDENCE! is heard a half-dozen times at least. But in private, she blames Fin, who denies pretty much everything.


THE SOLUTION

The children’s leaps of logic are quite astounding, really. They realise that someone came in to open their curtains so that they were guaranteed to see the horseman in the middle of the night. That must mean that someone is trying to scare them off. And you know what THAT means. There MUST be a secret passage in their room! This has slight hints of the book where the curtains are deliberately drawn so that someone can sneak in and access the secret passage there, but the children take their time to mull it over and come to a clever solution to a puzzle. They also decide that there must be someone else involved, someone who goes up into the tower where Fin and Mrs O say they can’t go as there is no key.

As with pretty much every episode my attention waned around this point. I must have been forty or fifty minutes in – the episodes are a ridiculous hour and a quarter or something. Anyway, they find the secret passage, some of them get kidnapped, Prince gets ill, Ruby gets kidnapped or trapped with the children. there’s more earthquakes, and then there’s some reveals about who is involved with the mystery in what capacity.

The green stuff is a potion for eternal life… or eternal youth, something like that. The mastermind is actually Ma O’Moon herself, and she brought the Arnolds in to test the potion on them, to make sure it was safe for her to take.

She and Fin argue over it all and it turns out Fin did the object stealing and horse-riding to try to scare the Arnolds away. He didn’t want them to end up like ‘the others’ who jumped from the tower believing they could fly. Ma isn’t best impressed when he denies the twang dongs etc. For some reasons she still says ITS THE SUBSIDENCE again for good measure and he insists IT’S FIN BAR HIMSELF.

And it turns out he’s right. There really is a ghostly presence, and it’s Fin Bar their ancestor who wants them to stop their bad ways. He even talks to them through the painting to say NO MORE.


MY THOUGHTS

So that is the main ‘plot’ of the episode, not that it makes a great deal of sense. There is also a Charlotte/Thaddeus sub plot, naturally. This time it’s more romantic than dramatic. Long story short, Charlotte proposes (I think we should get married, Thaddeus. Everyone thinks we’re a couple, and it would save on bedrooms  – but I suspect some of it was tongue in cheek, or I hope so at least) and Thaddeus pretty much does a runner. She goes looking for him and thus they miss much of the action at the castle while they mope and brood and argue. I predicted them having a relationship from the first episode, so this is hardly surprising, though there has been few, if any, romantic moments or anything official on them dating before this. It’s almost Bill and Allie-ish in the lacking romance department.

It takes just a little bit of over-dramaticness – Charlotte sliding down a tiny cliff – for Thaddeus to realise he does want to marry her after all.

And now, for the things that I couldn’t work into a plot synopsis.

Jack finally gets adopted into the Arnold family at the start as all the official paperwork has come through. Took them long enough!

Mike barely features in this episode – remember he was laid up in bed for most of Killimooin as well! This time he swaps places with Tom the gypsy boy. Tom wants to go visit a castle and Mike would rather go to the horse show with Tom’s father, so he’s there for two minutes at the start and end. It doesn’t make much difference either way as all the children are pretty interchangeable.

There’s so much melodrama it’s ridiculous. Laura is about to fall into the bog? NOOOOOO, cue slow-mo running. That’s Fin this time, but the children use shouting NO as a primary method of stopping things. Like Ruby falling off a cliff, or drinking more potion. And it’s entirely ineffective.  Prince tries to do a Lassie and fetch help and instead causes Thaddeus and Charlotte to drive off the road. Ruby nearly dances off the castle tower at the end, only to be SUNG down by Laura. But of course she slips anyway. For the drama.

NOT_THE_BOG

And lastly, we need to update our geography maps badly. They seem to drive from Spiggy Holes to Moon Castle. I think they’re trying to pretend that it’s all been set in England the whole time. Even so, they still drive from ‘England’ to ‘Ireland’ without so much as a mention of a ferry.

I think on the whole we can call this another ridiculous instalment and move on. They cut the Brimming sisters, turned the scary and creepy moments into melodrama, there’s no Prince Paul, no mines with men in suits, no pins and needles… all so they could write their own stuff about potions for eternal life (which turn your shed skin cells green – a Bad Science candidate for sure) and add real ghosts and a bog which seemed at first to be important and then had nothing to do with anything.

 

Posted in Blyton on Screen | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Monday

Here we are, another Monday, another week into the year, and we here at Word of Blyton aren’t quite sure what this week will bring you.

Fiona will try and get another TV epsiode of the Secret Series done and compared for you this week, and I think I shall end up with the last in the series of the audio comparisons of Malory Towers. So looking at the changes and cuts made to Last Term at Malory Towers.

I think thats all from me this Monday I’m afraid, we’ve not got any exciting news at the moment, but I hope you’ll all be back for our blogs this week!!!

I shall leave you with some pictures from my recent walk in our somewhat nicer weather than we have been having this week. Hope you like them!

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 1 Comment

In the Fifth at Malory Towers: Audio Adaptation

620wide+8751529

We’re almost at the end of these comparisons, mostly because there was only ever six to do with Malory Towers. In the Fifth is my second favourite Malory Towers book, the first being The Third Year at Malory Towers. The reason why In the Fifth is only my second favourite is because I didn’t read it until much later in my Enid Blyton reading.

In fact that is probably why the Fifth is one of my favourites, when I reading the book the girls were the right age for me to relate to in my tender teenage years. I could see why they decided to treat the new girl Maureen Little the way they did. This part has made it into the taped adaptation I have, but I have no idea on whether it would have been edited or removed from the later versions as the way the girls handle Maureen can be seen as cruel and in fact, is a form of bullying. However it being a Blyton book and Maureen being one of the ‘bad’ girls and everyone else being ‘good’ as a youngster you get away with the scenes as it just means that everyone is being put in their place.

As an adult however the handling of Maureen, Catherine and Gwen is uncomfortable to listen to, let alone read the full descriptions of ‘taking them down a peg’. In fact the attitude of our ‘good’ girls is hardly anything spectacular. Blyton might have included that to show that even though there are silly people in the word, not everyone is one thing or the other. I know now that life, even for the ‘good’ and ‘bad’ people is never as easy as it seems. People aren’t all bad and people aren’t all good. We all deal with things differently and perhaps the way the fifth dealt with Maureen, Gwen and Catherine was them trying to deal with things in a very young way. In fact the first suggestion is to act scornfully towards them but this was turned down in favour of laughter. The acting out of it can be a bit lacking in intensity and drama, whereas the book gives the full whack. I never realized the seriousness of the situation when I was younger and through the audio, but being older and having read the book, I see the horridness behind the actions.

The cassette covers things quite closely in this one, though there are swathes of text cut and more instrumental music to fill in long gaps where the narrator walks you through the book. The Fifth is one of the better adapted novels as the plot does not jump about from chapter to chapter and follows a main story arc. This holds it together better throughout the audio experience and things to not seem quite so random in this one. Perhaps it is because we know the characters better or that I just know the book by heart I know whats happening in-between the segments of text. As a once first time listener with no idea of what the book said these audios do work well, but now as a seasoned Blytonite, the world from the books has become my life and the most important thing about it was the description that Blyton included in her books. I loved that we got more of a flavour about the characters in the books, and little glimpses of character that were somehow lost in the audio. It was through the books that I began to fall in love and enjoy the characters even more!

One of the nicest things about In the Fifth is that when the Fifth form perform their pantomime, and go through rehearsals, we get to hear parts of ‘Darrell’s’ script. Of course these aren’t really included in the book and must have been put in by the script writer but they really do make the whole idea of the fifth putting on a pantomime more or less realistic. It is a performance I would have paid any silly amount of money to see; I really would. I’m sure it was the performance of a life time for the girls, and through the audio we get to experience a little bit of that magic.

As I’ve said, this has to be one of my favourite audios, and even though like the rest of them, it has its plot cut about to condense it into an hours performance, the result is a pleasing one. A lot of it is down to the actors of course, and perhaps needing more ‘oomph’ in their plummy acting, but still these are the girls of Malory Towers, they’re learning to become proper ladies!

Next review: Last Term at Malory Towers: Audio adaptation

Or read a review of the In the Fifth novel here.

Posted in Audio Books and Audio Dramatisations | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Twins at St Clare’s – How has Blyton’s original text fared in a modern edition? part 6

This week (after abandoning this series for over a month) I got through two chapters. That leaves just five to go. Earlier posts – one, two, three, four and five.


CHAPTER FIFTEEN: A TERRIBLE QUARREL

The class-related discussions suffer from the most updating in this chapter. There are one or two slightly uncomfortable moments, where the St Clare’s girls look down on Sheila for being ‘new-money’ (though that phrase is never used). Saying that, it is made clear that they don’t care that she’s not always been rich, but that she hasn’t been honest about her situation and has pretended to be something she’s not. That may still sound horrible, but Sheila was one to constantly brag about her house and servants… and well, that’s where the edits start to creep in so I will get on with documenting them.

Sheila brags (or indeed swanks) about her marvellous home and the number of servants they keep, and her horse, and their three motor-cars. This gets changed to her marvellous home, and her horse, and their three cars. Obviously nobody nowadays is allowed to have servants, but the least they could do was make it staff. Very rich people still pay people to cook and clean for them! Also, three cars is hardly boarding-school bragging material now. I would think that having only three cars might be a shameful point.

Likewise, Janet’s speech about Sheila’s bragging gets cut up. She had said you talk about your servants and your Rolls-Royce cars, your house and your lake and goodness knows what – and then you talk like the daughter of the dustman! and now it is you talk about your house, and your cars, your horse and your lake and goodness knows what – and then you talk like a barrow-boy.

Again, that could have been staff rather than servants and Rolls-Royce is still a well-known luxury car brand. Or they could have had Janet mention their Bugatti Veyrons or Porches of course, if they wanted something more ‘now’. Also, I’m not sure how barrow-boy is less offensive or classist than daughter of a dustman.  I suppose that there are likely to be daughters of bin-men reading, and not so many barrow-boys but the classism is still there. I’m not entirely sure it’s that classist, even. It would be like saying ‘you waltz around like you’re the queen and then talk like you’re from a council estate’. It’s not polite, but it points out an incongruity.

Janet also says that decent people don’t use some of the phrases Sheila does. This has been changed to simply that people don’t. I suppose they felt that it wasn’t fair to imply people who don’t speak ‘well’ aren’t decent, but that’s Janet’s opinion and not a fact.

I sort of agree with one change, however. Initially Sheila knew she wasn’t as good as the others [because she was born poor]. This has been changed to she thought she wasn’t as good. I think that’s a positive change as Sheila isn’t any less good than girls who were lucky to be born into wealthy families. She might not be as nice as them, or have other skills they do, but she isn’t a lesser person for that. Though saying that, Sheila ‘knowing’ something is still a very personal thing. She could ‘know’ she is not as good and yet be entirely wrong.

After all that there are still a few minor changes to mention. The habit of removing some italics continues, though the majority are left. So what is the matter with her? loses much of its emphasis. ‘What is the matter with her?’ sounds like a very casual question. With the is highlighted, however, it makes the speaker sound quite flummoxed.

Good heavens is used twice in the chapter, both times the newer edition makes it Good Heavens. I can’t say I particularly agree with that. Then again I’m not a fan of ‘he’ etc getting capitals when it’s to do with God.

The gramophone is again ‘updated’ to a record player – I’m sure I’ve already queried why Pat and Isabel aren’t putting their i-Pods into a dock to play music.

Queer becomes strange and every one quite rightly becomes everyone as it refers to people.

There are also two things left in that seem strange. Janet, in another rant, says goodness knows how many servants and cars and that is left unedited – the only reference to servants which isn’t removed. They also leave twopence in (I can’t remember the exact wording now but it was as in ‘I don’t care twopence for her) when usually now it’s tuppence.


CHAPTER SIXTEEN: SHEILA DOES HER BIT

And then, after all that, I could only find one change to this chapter. It’s hardly worth mentioning, really. Very left-out becomes very left out. That’s it.


I make that as nine changes – all in chapter 15. That brings us to 72 in total.

Posted in Updating Blyton's Books | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Monday

Ristorante5 (1)

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Famous Five 90s Style: Five Are Together Again

Now the general consensus from Blytonites is that Five Are Together Again is one of the weakest series endings to come from Blyton, and that it really isn’t the best adventure the Five could have ended on. If you think the book is poor, then maybe its easier to understand why there are so many changes to the script in this one. Its almost like a completely new adventure based on the bones of the original –  a little like Five Have a Wonderful Time –  except no broken leg had to be accommodated this time.

So many of you know that the basis of this book is; the Kirrin cousins go to stay with Tinker Hayling because George’s parents are in quarantine for scarlet fever because Joan the cook has come down with the illness. However in the 90s adaptation the children have just been sent to stay with Tinker while his father stays with the Kirrins as the two professors need to work. The Five and Tinker are left without adult supervision as the Hayling’s cook/housekeeper is no where to be seen! Once again it’s left to Julian to be the responsible one, making Marco Williamson’s Julian even harder to like as he assumes the air of superiority. It really doesn’t help the case for Julian not being seen as a bossy boots at all!

The biggest change to the story line is the introduction of the Japanese garden, where a lot of the action seems to take place in the adaptation. In the book Kirrin Island is the destination chosen by George to hide the papers that had been stolen. The Japanese garden doesn’t seem even half as safe as Kirrin Island does, even if you know the end of the story (I must admit I have a hazy memory of it but I haven’t read it in years) but I suspect the change in story had to come from the fact that the production company Zenith had pulled out of the series by the time the second series came around. So the use of some of the sets was pulled, which obviously made it harder to follow some of the story lines to a T.

The framework of the plot is there, but there is a lot that just doesn’t feel right. It doesn’t really flow, and the weakest book seems to have translated into the weakest TV episode. The use of the chimp Charlie was very well done –  he wasn’t over or under used but his comic element wasn’t really there mostly I suppose because of time. Even with a poor plot like Together Again, 25 minutes is not enough to convey the proper comedic timings or various characters. There are some good scenes in the book of flare ups between Tinker and the others, not to mention Jenny the housekeeper and Professor Hayling. Also the discovery of the ransacked study in the tower at the bottom of the Hayling’s garden is much less dramatic than in the books. Instead of an anguished howl from the professor it’s sort of met by flat disbelief from the Five who discover the mess.

Tinker also seems to have lost a few brain cells in this one and starts acting like a child once again, even though he is clearly as old as the rest of the Five. I would like to take a moment here to note that James Tomlinson is one of the only guest stars to return over the two series. He appears once in Demon’s Rocks which is in series one and then again in this episode which is filmed in series two. The rest of the guest stars, if they gave reoccurring episodes are kept within the same series. I wish I knew why! In fact the change in Five Have a Wonderful Time from Jo to Sniffer is still a mystery to me (however, you can see my theory to why that would have taken place here).

There is the added distraction and farce of the two Tapper clowns who just seem to be scene stealers, and though it doesn’t take much, give Anne the creeps until she mysteriously decides that they’re all right at the end of the episode. I’m pretty sure that the clowns don’t appear much in the books (Fiona’ll tell me if I’m wrong I’m sure!) so they seem rather an odd choice to add into an already skewed episode.

As ever the Five come through and it’s all laughs at the end. You may be able to tell I am not a huge fan of this particular episode or book for that matter and that is rare for me. I do feel, however, that you just can’t win them all, and this is one that was possibly better somewhere in the middle of the series than at the end of it. We needed a more dramatic ending I think, something that really sends the series of books and TV shows off with a good shove! Fingers crossed for a still to be discovered hidden book somewhere that rounds it off? I know I’d enjoy that!

So that concludes my Famous Five 90s style blogs. If you’re still interested I may look at the 70s episodes compared to the books. Let me know in the comments if that’s worth me doing!

23

Posted in Blyton on Screen | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Rilloby Fair Mystery

I did much better in reading the second book in the series, and read it over a couple of days this time. Again, I had picked it up quite naturally to read for myself and not for blogging which I think helped.

Last time I wrote The Barney Mysteries (or R Mysteries as they’re also known) are of a similar nature to The Famous Five, The Adventure Series and the Secret Series. They never venture too far afield but each book takes place somewhere new, during a holiday. And it turns out I wasn’t quite right. I had entirely forgotten that Rilloby Fair takes place within cycling distance of Roger and Diana’s home village. It’s also a bit more like a Find-Outers story, as it’s investigating crimes rather than falling into an adventure.

620wide+4498325


THE MAIN STORY

The basic premise is that there have been several unusual burglaries in the local newspaper. They are unusual as it is old papers and letters that have been taken, and there’s no apparent way a thief could have gotten in or out  – a series of locked-room mysteries. Roger, Diana and Snubby get involved because Great-Uncle Robert is staying with the Lyntons and he is an expert in old papers.

It’s Diana that has the big brainwave, about a fair being near the locations of the thefts and so they begin their ‘find-outing’ by visiting the fair and generally snooping around. Barney just so happens to be working with that fair, which helps! They’re even clever enough to predict the next burglaries, and are able to visit Marloes Castle before the crime is committed to do their research.

They also do Blyton-worthy midnight trips to the castle to try to catch the criminals in action, though in the end it is only Snubby and Looney who manage this as the others are laid up from eating dodgy fair sausages.

487wide+7728234


AND THE SECONDARY STORY

Running through the story is a sub-plot whereby Snubby, having met Great-Uncle Robert on a train and having no clue who he was, weaves a story about being on the run from the Green Hands Gang. Great-Uncle, being exceptionally clever about old documents and apparently very stupid about everything else, believes every word and so when green gloves do turn up amongst the clues he is most shocked. This makes it even more Find-Outerish as it is very like Fatty to stuff up Mr Goon with nonsense about red-headed delivery boys and such like. It’s also a little like the Find-Outers putting out fake clues for PC Pippin, then realising they have created confusion with a real crime. Snubby implies the made-up Green Hands Gang has something to do with the crimes, when the green gloves have an entirely different origin.


MY THOUGHTS

I’m sure I read this when I was much younger and I didn’t work out who-dunnit or indeed how-dunnit then. Reading it this time I knew who the actual thief was (but I couldn’t remember exactly who was or was not the mastermind) so I could see the careful laying of clues and hints along the way. Blyton may get a bad rap for her writing, but you can’t accuse her of presenting a solution to a mystery without having laid the plans for it first.

I remember spotting it first when the children talk to Barney about the fair-folk, and if anyone would have the knowledge to steal valuable documents. They also ask him if anyone collects things, like antiques, for example, and he tells them someone collects toy animals. He doesn’t believe this to be of any consequence, it’s a throw-away comment as it’s a laughable notion that the collector could be a thief, and yet it turns out to be an important clue later on.

Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! 

I won’t tell you who the thief is, but if you want a clue and don’t mind a spoiler: the thief and solution are also used in Five Are Together Again. (But not half as well!)

Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! 

I wouldn’t say we see much in the way of character development again. Diana at least gets to be the clever one on occasion, and Roger makes the most of a Julian-like tendency of ordering her to go/stay home and be out of the way of any danger. Snubby is the same as ever and is quite lucky that his silly stories don’t reach Mr Lyton as he is a surly character prone to thrashing children who don’t behave! It’s very 1940s but I find him quite unlikeable, really. Uncle Quentin at least had a scientific temperament as an excuse – he would blow up and then forget all about it. Mr Lynton is much colder and more calculating, and doesn’t seem to relish his own children’s presence half the time!

We get a little more insight into Barney’s life during the book, as he thinks about how he doesn’t really belong anywhere. He knows that he and Snubby both have lost their parents, but he feels that at least Snubby ‘belongs’ with the Lytons, where as he has nowhere he can call home.

I enjoyed re-reading this one. It’s a clever mystery with a satisfying solution, and while the characters are not always hugely memorable they are generally likeable.

Next review: The Rubadub Mystery

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , | 2 Comments

The Mondays Keep Coming

So we’re speeding through April already, and we’re into the second week! Oh gosh!

This week Fiona will be bringing you the review of The Rilloby Fair Mystery, which I’m sure we’re all looking forward to.

I hope to have a better week this week, but I shall review the final Famous Five episode from the 90s – Five are Together Again for Friday. Hope that’s enough to whet your appetites!

Here are some pictures of spring flowers to help you get into that fresh mood for the week! Enjoy!

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 1 Comment

35 Things We Learned From the Famous Five a reblog from Forever Amber

Amber, of Forever Amber, has come up with a list of things we learn from the Famous Five, including:

1. All underground caves have a stream running through them. If you find yourself trapped in one (by smugglers, natch), all you have to do is follow the stream to the place where it breaks ground, and you will be freed.

2. You will almost always end up trapped in an underground cave during the “hols”, so you better have been paying attention to point 1.

3. Don’t worry, though – your faithful dog or other animal friend will guide you through the dark, winding tunnels to safety if the underground stream thing doesn’t work out.

Endpapers of Five Run Away Together, 1944 Hodder & Stoughton 1st Edition, by Eileen Soper. Oh for a torch like that!

There are another 32 things she has learned which can be read here.

And this all got me thinking. What else could we say we have learned from Blyton’s books in general?

  • Tutors are not to be trusted – they are either wrong doers or undercover policemen.
  • If a burglary has taken place locally you and your friends will be best placed to solve the crime. People chat to children and will tell them all sorts of incriminating things.
  • Midnight feasts WILL lead to stomach aches the next day.
  • If a locked room has been ransacked for papers, it was probably the work of a highly-trained chimp and you should look into nearby circuses or fairs.

Anything else?

Posted in Personal Experiences | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Child April – A poem by Enid Blyton

Today I’m bringing you a poem from Blyton’s Poetry Book.

I hope you like it.

Child April

Oh, April is a fairy child, a fairy child is she,
As wayward as the little winds a-blowing,
For will she smile or will she cry, for all the world to see,
There’s never, oh, there’s never any knowing!
So pelt her with apple-blossom, scatter her with daises,
Cool her feet with pearly drops of dew,
Call upon the little birds to sing her pretty praises,
And bid the sky bedeck itself in blue!

Oh, Cuckoo, are you coming now, for April wants to hear
Your pretty double-note among the trees?
You mustn’t disappoint her, or she’ll cry a little tear,
And send it silver-splashing on the breeze.
She’ll weep until a rainbow about the sky is glowing,
And then she’ll laugh and gaily dance away,
And by the springing bluebells you’ll know the way she’s going,
To see the cuckoo, singing loud and gay!

Its rather a good metaphor for spring and the weather we have in April isn’t it? What do you think of this April poem? I wish I could hear a cuckoo, I don’t think I’ve heard one before! I also wish the weather was a little kinder, but it does put me in mind of a toddler having a tantrum and not knowing what it wants!

I also quite enjoy the idea of April dancing through the land leaving bluebells in her wake. They are one of my favourite flowers by far. I do love bluebells. My gran used to tell me that if you picked one, a pixie would follow you home and cause havoc, so you mustn’t pick them. I never have; however now I suspect it had more to do with them being protected than any magical creature. I may be wrong, its not impossible!

Posted in Poetry | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

The Secret Series on TV : The Secret of Killimooin

I’m going to break this post down into two headings: Things that are like the book and Things that are not like the book. I highly suspect that the second one will produce many more points.


THINGS THAT ARE LIKE THE BOOK

The children fly to Baronia to stay with Prince Paul, and after visiting the castle they go off to the mountains.

There’s a statue in a cave, and the ear is used to open a secret tunnel.

There is a “secret” forest.

And that’s all I can think of.


THINGS THAT ARE NOT LIKE THE BOOK

Ruby goes along for the ride. Her main role appears to be falling for silly pranks (believing Paul that the Baronian tradition is to remove the king’s shoe, throw it over your shoulder and shout “the king’s feet go everywhere”) and getting lost in the mountains for a whole night. She does eventually reach the palace to summon help, though.

Charlotte and Thaddeus manage to get themselves tied up in the adventure yet again. Charlotte gets herself kidnapped by an old enemy and Thaddeus trails after them, both of them ending up in Baronia exactly where the children are.

The main plot is no longer about mysterious robbers who live in a forest no-one else has ever found a way into. Instead, it’s about an insane scientist who is trying to create a race of ‘living dead’ using spider venom. (He calls it poison all the way through but Ewan informs me spiders are venomous, not poisonous). So this crazy scientist has set up a network of underground tunnels and labs under the forest of Killimooin to carry out these important works. And naturally, when he and his henchmen discover Charlotte has seen them stealing a spider they kidnap her and bring her directly to their base of operations.

The main plot contains a huge amount of bad science. So bad I’m going to have a subheading.


Bad science

Venom (or poison) is drawn from a spider’s back using a large pipette. No needle or anything, just a pipette.

A henchman is bitten by a spider (as a punishment for trying to defect, of course) and has a near instantaneous collapse. He is then given the extracted venom from another spider orally and recovers within seconds, just as our crazy scientist predicted. The idea of using one venom as an antidote is ridiculous in its own right (here’s how anti-venoms are really made) and the idea that swallowing a mouthful of any anti-venom would cure you immediately is just as stupid.

Despite our henchman screaming in pain as soon as he’s bitten, and being affected right away, both Thaddeus and Mike take much longer to be affected. Mike feels dizzy soon after and spends the rest of the episode in bed (unaware he’s even been bitten), with Thaddeus races around rescuing Charlotte, passing out, losing Charlotte, rescuing her again, over and over it seems. He only collapses fully in the last ten minutes or so. Oh, and he’s saved when Charlotte gives him both the venom and anti-venom orally, not knowing which is which. (He doesn’t turn into the living-dead, incidentally.) Mike is cured by the housekeeper’s medicinal soup.

The scientist’s goal is to use the venom and the antidote together, somehow creating a race of people who are both living and dead at the same time. Literally, as he says, the living dead. Ewan believes this is where the  zombies in The Walking Dead may have come from, as he was watching that in the other room at the time.

Charlotte is to be his first test and is sealed in a pod that looks like it came from a bad sci-fi show. They don’t want to kill her, beyond her being the living dead I mean, so they pump ‘life-preserving gas’ into the pod.

There’s also talk of these living-dead people being “reactivated” with more anti-venom…

Laura and Peggy do their usual ‘scream as loud as you can’ performance right near the end, which causes each and every spider tank to shatter. I don’t know about you, but if I was going to keep deadly spiders I’d have them in some pretty sturdy tanks. Not the sort that would smash from an elbow bump or a human scream. Incidentally, it has been proven possible for an un-augmented human voice to smash glass, but only under certain circumstances. A professional singer who can sing at over 100 decibels (louder than a jack hammer), using the correct frequency and directing it at a fragile wine glass may shatter it. Two silly girls shrieking in a room full of spider tanks… not so much.

Their screams are also sufficient to have the crazy scientist and his henchmen all incapacitated and clutching their heads. The boys are perfectly fine, though.


And now back to the regularly scheduled criticisms:

There’s no mountain palace, no Yamen or Tooku. Instead we have an old wooden cabin and a housekeeper who looks like a stereotypical Scandinavian milkmaid. The children have to hike up to the cabin (no donkeys).

There’s also no Ranni or Pilescu. They are replaced by Barney Stokes, an ex secret service agent from the states. He acts as Paul’s bodyguard from the trip and it’s evident from early on that he’s up to something. He’s supposed to have called in the palace guard when Laura goes missing, but when they don’t turn up he says “it takes them some time to get organised.” We’re proven right later when he ties up Ruby. He then saves her after she rescues herself with the help of a rope-chewing goat, and admits he has been blackmailed into helping the crazy scientist keep people away from the mountains.

We should have known there was something not right just by his outfit: tartan trousers and a Butlin’s style blazer.

There’s no underground river fraught with danger, just miles of tunnels with one or two gates that need passwords to open.


I think we can conclude that this bears almost no resemblance to the original book. It’s less like the book than Spiggly Holes and Secret Island put together. I don’t know why they got rid of every single interesting element and replaced it all with crazy science and about an hour of people running about high-tech tunnels and woods full of CCTV cameras.

Our baddies aren’t even convincing. OK, scientist guy is absolutely NUTS. But his key henchman (I think his name was Block) is laughable. He looks like Gestapo officer Toht from Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark, but without an inch of menace (or a really cool travel coat-hanger). He’s clever enough to go to kidnap Charlotte and destroy any photos she has of him, yet stupid enough to take an open bag of secret documents with him. Naturally he leaves behind a document with an address on it which allows Thaddeus to find Charlotte. He also calls the scientist “master” and whimpers and cowers in his presence.

Most of the other henchmen look like soldiers, in full camo gear and balaclavas which they never take off, even inside the complex. They’re easily taken out by a) Thaddeus in a weakened spider-bite state and b) two girls screaming. The only two not in army garb are dressed like bikers (one even has a hideous curly mullet) and they can’t keep a woman in a sealed wooden crate long enough to transport her to Baronia without her escaping twice.

There are several other plot holes and illogical sequences but I think I’ve written enough to put you all off already.

The last thing I’ll mention is Laura (who is a queen of sulking in captivity) tells the scientist that she is Laura Arnold and she is from ENGLAND. In that snotty way that British people seem to always say, as in “I’m British – you can’t do anything to me.” Only problem is, she says it in the strongest New Zealand accent possible, and it’s fairly clear throughout that they have never set foot in England at any point.

To summarise: nothing like the book. No stars.

Posted in Blyton on Screen | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Comments

First Monday of April

Easter is now over, and I have no chocolate left. I will just have to hope that I don’t get trapped in any caves now, as I will have nothing for sustenance. Not that I tend to carry chocolate in my pocket, that is, so I’ve realistically got no hope. I also fail to carry a torch, rope, pencil, chalk or any other useful stuck-in-a-cave items. This is rather the topic of the post we’ve got for Sunday so I won’t say any more about it now. Yes – we have another week with a Sunday post!

Wednesday3

 

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Land of Far-Beyond, reviewed by Chris

I have been planning for a while to write about The Land of Far-Beyond, but have been held back by no longer having a copy. It seems to be out of print and second hand copies are often eye-wateringly expensive. But I have taken the plunge and for a ‘mere’ £26 have acquired a late reprint of the 1970 Dragon paperback edition (since doing so I have discovered that a new edition comes out in October 2016). The edition I have is the one shown here (this and all other images taken from the Enid Blyton Society website):

the-land-of-far-beyond-2 (1)

This book is not much discussed on Blyton sites, including this one, although there is one excellent review by Anita Bensoussane on the Enid Blyton Society website. I have always remembered it as being an unusual book and it has been interesting to re-read it now for the first time since I was, perhaps, 10 or 12. First published by Methuen in 1942, it is indeed very different to the other Blyton books, or the ones that I know, anyway. It is a loose re-interpretation of John Bunyan’s 1678 religious allegory The Pilgrim’s Progress. Whilst Blyton’s story are often ‘moralistic’, sometimes gratingly so, The Land of Far-Beyond is a morality tale, with explicitly religious themes.

The book starts with a depiction of children running wild in the City of Turmoil, playing cruel tricks, stealing, and sadistically throwing stones at animals. A mysterious stranger makes ‘burdens’ appear on their backs which represent all their cruelty, flaws and sins. What used to be carried in their hearts and souls is now externalised to be part of their bodies. These burdens appear in the illustrations to look like large, rough rucksacks but they are physically unmovable and, of course, heavy and painful to carry. The only way to be rid of them is to travel the arduous journey to the Land of Far-Beyond and enter the City of Happiness (the Celestial City in Bunyan). This they can only do by following the narrow path and not departing from it.

The children are joined by five adults who have also had burdens placed on them by the stranger. They are Sarah Simple, Mr Fearful, Gracie Grumble, Dick Cowardly and Mr Scornful. As in Bunyan, the characters have names to express their characteristics. Actually, the children are the exception as they are called John, Lily, Anna, Peter and Patience, but it is explained that Anna means ‘merciful’, Peter ‘rock-like’ and Patience, well, patient (John and Lily alone are omitted from the general pattern). So the ten characters set off on their journey.

Although the details are different to Bunyan’s story, the basic principle is the same. The path to salvation is a narrow one and the problems arise from being tempted off that path. These temptations are represented by characters such as Mr Doubt, the Demons of Boredom or Lord Arrogance; or by hazards such as the river of Hate, the house of Lies or the tunnel of Disgust. On the other hand, along the way there are some allies such as Comfort, Courage and Mr Industrious.

Mostly, there is an internal logic to all this – Miss Flatter leads the travellers into the Meadows of Conceit, for example. But they only end up in the Castle of Giant Cruelty because they are helping Temper, Rage and Wrath who have injured each other fighting. It is not that the travellers themselves have exhibited these failings. At all events, gradually they all fall by the wayside or go back to the City of Turmoil, and only Anna, Peter and Patience enter the City of Happiness and lose their burdens. The book ends very abruptly at this point.

Mr Scornful does reach the City of Happiness, but is turned away at the gates because he has not lost all of his scorn or learnt all the lessons of the journey. However, an alternative route is offered to him so he may lose his burden eventually, although we are not told. He is the only one of the characters with any depth, and he does show himself often to be both brave and sensible, and acts as the leader, and the children value this. Other characters are rather hard done by, I felt. Miss Simple gives up the journey because she believes the warnings of Mr Doubt, but being simple is hardly a sin and she is kind and good-natured so it seems harsh to imply that salvation is reserved for the intelligent.

Despite being very different to Blyton’s other books, as I re-read it I thought that it was in a way slightly similar to the Faraway Tree stories and the Wishing Chair stories in that it is a series of mini-adventures, with each encounter with a new set of characters being like, say, a new land at the top of the Faraway Tree. As with Bunyan, the descriptions of the landscape of the journey are very evocative, and have an eery, dream-like quality. There is also a sense, not intended by Blyton of course, of the kind of computer games where you have to navigate various rooms or hazards to progress to the ultimate goal. I’ve since read that some computer game designers are indeed influenced by the Pilgrim’s Progress.

Finally, re-reading the book what was most instantly recognizable and striking was not the story, although it is engaging, but the extraordinary illustrations by Horace Knowles. These are the same as in the original edition and they have a strange, mediaeval character that is most haunting. Blyton was very well-served by her illustrators. For those alone I think my £26 was well spent, but in fact reading the story again was also rewarding. It is as entertaining and thought-provoking as I remembered.

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , , , | 11 Comments

Making Blyton’s Food: Mrs Glump’s melt-in-the-mouth shortbread

We are having a bit of a ‘Barney Mysteries’ week as Fiona has reviewed The Rockingdown Mystery for us this week and I’m going to tell you about the shortbread from our favourite Jane Brocket book Cherry Cake and Ginger Beer.

This recipe is based on the cook Mrs Glump’s melt in the mouth shortbread, clear by the title of the recipe, that is supposed to be the best recipe that Ms Brocket had found. I know I have reviewed a shortbread recipe before but I thought I would give you a comparison between the recipes and the final product.

Now you will recall from the previous blog that I have been making the other recipe from childhood so you can suspect that I would be a bit biased. However this recipe does make very nice shortbread biscuits, even if the beginning takes a lot of elbow grease if you’re like me, and forget to take the butter out of the fridge.

Anyway, simple ingredients and a simple method. So let me share it with you.

The ingredients are as follows;

  • 170g butter, softened
  • 85g caster sugar, plus extra for sprinkling.
  • 230g plain flour
  • 30g cornflour

Now I’ve never used the cornflour in the recipe before so this is new to me. I must say I haven’t quite worked out what it does, but the biscuits turned out well, so I won’t knock it.

Now for the method;

  1. Preheat the oven to 180c or gas mark 4
  2. In a mixing bowl, beat the butter until creamy with a wooden spoon or electric mixer (the amount of times I had to remove the butter from the electric mixer is ridiculous!)
  3. Add the the sugar and beat until pale and fluffy. (For me the butter creamed a lot better when the sugar was added).
  4. Sift in the flour and cornflour and work into the mix with a wooden spoon or your hands until it comes together.
  5. Place dough on a floured surface and knead gently a few times to make smooth and rollable.
  6. Using a wooden rolling pin, roll out of the dough to a thickness of about 5mm then cut out rounds with a biscuit cutter.
  7. Place the rounds slightly apart on a baking tray.
  8. Knead the remains back into a ball and repeat point 6.
  9. Prick biscuits with a fork and sprinkle with sugar
  10. Bake for 12-15 mins (I needed 15 mins) or until the shortbread is firm but still pale. Do not let them go golden or worse brown.
  11. Transfer onto wire rack and leave biscuits to cool.

So there you have it, how to make really good, Blyton approved biscuits! Please give them a go and tell us what you think?

 

Posted in Food and recipes | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

The Rockingdown Mystery

Some considerable time ago – so long ago it was in 2015 – I started reading The Rockingdown Mystery for a read-a-thon on the Enid Blyton Society forums. I think I got about as far as page 29 before my interest trailed off and it got put to the side. I always find that reading for the purpose of dissecting, commenting or reviewing can spoil the enjoyment as you are forever looking for flaws or interesting details. And, if you’re me, you’re forever setting the book down to write a note before you forget.

1956 edition, Gilbert Dunlop

1956 edition, Gilbert Dunlop

So this week I found myself in-between books (well actually I had half a dozen on the go, but finished one and wasn’t in a mood for the others) so I ended up picking up The Rockingdown Mystery again and read the rest of it over two days. I read it without deliberate thought, without nitpicking or fact checking, and it wasn’t until I was almost finished it that I thought I might well review it for the blog. I finished it off in bed that night and jotted down a few points I wanted to remember, just a few key words to remind me later.

This may make for a different sort of review from me as I tend to (perhaps unfortunately) end up writing a lengthy description of all the events in a book with some opinions thrown in along the way. This time, having read the book a few days ago I don’t remember nearly enough detail to do that sort of thing.


THE STORY

Roger, Diana and their cousin Snubby (plus his dog Loony) go to stay with Miss Pepper (a governess-type figure who they already know). They are staying in Rockingdown Village which boasts an old abandoned mansion by the same name. During their stay they meet a circus boy called Barney who owns a small monkey by the name of Miranda. Together they start exploring the house, and Barney even stays there a few nights to save money on lodgings. During his stay he hears loud banging in the night which of course has to be investigated. Only, the children aren’t the only ones to be hunting around Rockingdown Manor – their tutor, Mr King, seems all too interested as well.

Barney manages to get himself into a rather troublesome situation, trapped under the house in a tunnel/cave formation which just so happens to be used by smugglers. I won’t give the details of the ending away, but naturally he does eventually get out and the baddies are neatly dealt with by the police.


A FEW THOUGHTS ON THE SERIES AND CHARACTERS

The Barney Mysteries (or R Mysteries as they’re also known) are of a similar nature to The Famous Five, The Adventure Series and the Secret Series. They never venture too far afield but each book takes place somewhere new, during a holiday. The characters aren’t perhaps as well-developed, however. Roger is rather bland, and Diana doesn’t have a particularly strong personality either. You could liken her to Anne at least as far as being lumped with the cleaning goes, but she doesn’t have that sweet, sunny personality. She’s a little stroppy, but not on a George or Dinah scale.

The other two boys are of more interest, though. Snubby would drive me mad should I be forced to share a holiday home with him, but he is amusing to read about. (For example, instead of remaining on the planned train and meeting his cousins at the arranged point, he gets off and catches a different connection thus arriving at the house and having a large lunch while Roger and Diana are still waiting for him.) Loony is also interesting as he has a has a habit of stealing hair brushes, rugs, mats, cleaning cloths, shoes and anything else that he can pile up in the hall. He’s not a dog of Timmy’s calibre but he is smart enough to turn his back on Mr King while the children are on the outs with the tutor.

He had gotten half-way over the grounds when he discovered that Loony was carrying Miss Pepper’s hair-brush. So back he went and stood beneath Miss Pepper’s bedroom window. He threw the brush up and it went straight in at the window.

There was an agonised yell, and Snubby took to his heels. “Well, how was I to know what she was standing in the way…”

He looked down at Loony who was again at his heels. This time he was carrying Mrs. Round’s old shoe-cleaning brush. Snubby stopped and addressed Loony fiercely. “What do you think you’re doing? Do you suppose I’m going to spend half-the day taking back your silly brushes?… Take it back!…”

Loony wagged his tail and darted off. Snubby was pleased… He petted Loony when he came back. “Good dog. Took it all the way back to the kitchen and dropped it at Roundy’s feet, I bet. Cleverest dog in the world.”

Loony was very pleased. He had just dropped the brush down the nearest rabbit-hole. Well – if Snubby was so delighted with him, he’d drop plenty of other things down the rabbit-hole too.

Shows how perfect the two of them are for each other, I think!

Barney is of interest as a circus boy with a monkey, naturally. But also because he is well-read and has a love of Shakespearian literature. We don’t get to know an awful lot about him in this first book, but his story unfolds throughout the series.

Barney and Miranda

Barney and Miranda


THE MYSTERY PLOT

As for the plot, it has similarities to many Blyton books. That’s not a surprise as she used plot devices, similar locations and situations many times along with new elements and yet still always managed to create an engaging story. The cave/tunnel features an underground stream and hidden entrance somewhat like in Five Go Off in a Caravan. There’s even the same idea of sending an animal (Miranda/Pongo) off with a note to bring rescuers (though it seems to take Barney a lot longer to come up with the idea). Underground rivers also feature in The Secret Mountain and The Secret of Killimooin. The lighting in the cave brings to mind the hiding place of the ‘spook train’ in Five Go Off to Camp. Also, the illegal underground operation has similarities to the one in The Island of Adventure, the similarity only compounded by the suspicions held of Mr King and his involvement.

One or two things I did wonder about were the mechanics of the smuggling operation. Suddenly, mid-page I suddenly thought “huh, hang on. The stream is completely blocked at the other end. How do they then winch the boxes up it?” I was so perturbed I demanded this of my partner who was also sat in bed reading. Having no clue as to what I was talking about, he was of no help. I then had the realisation – having adjusted my mental picture of the underground setup a page or two later – that maybe they dropped the boxes down the hole into the stream and went from there. I announced this out loud, just in case Ewan was sitting worrying away, and later found out I was right.

That then led me to the ‘whys’ of the situation. Large boxes of smuggled goods are brought up the river, lugged across a farm, dropped down a hole, winched along an underground stream, lifted out, unpackaged, sorted into smaller bundles and then sent back the other way. It seems like an awful lot of complicated machinery and effort when it could have been done in a barn, especially when the goods seemed to be repackaged and sent out the same night. But if they had done it all in the barn the children would never have stumbled upon it and there would have been no mystery to Rockingdown.

Not long before that I had been pondering the use/reason for the cellar room in Rockingdown Manor having a secret door into this underground area. It only worked one way, hence Barney getting through but not back, so it couldn’t possibly be of much use. It’s later said that it was for the owners of Rockingdown Manor to get rid of unwanted people. Quite dark for Blyton!


FINAL THOUGHTS

The Barney Mysteries have a few of the most chilling and perhaps even macabre situations amongst the Blyton books. The story of Ring o’ Bells is even more so, but the nursery at Rockingdown is still chilling in its own way. Death rarely features in a Blyton book, and if it does it’s always a long-ago event with little emotional impact. Lots of children are orphans, but beyond “his/her parents died many years ago,” it’s not often brought up. The deaths of the Rockingdown children are discussed, though. How sad it must have been that little Arabella fell out of the window and died, and then Master Robert caught scarlet fever and died too. The shut off nurseries, left exactly as they were right after Robert died, are quite poignant and yet the children say that they feel happier than the rest of the old house.

So apparently even if I don’t give you a blow by blow account of a book I still ramble on for far too long.

All in all this is a good book that (once you stop nitpicking at every page) draws you in and makes you want to keep reading to find out what happens next. The children are likeable enough, and Snubby, Barney and Loony have enough personality to carry the others along with them. Mr King is no Bill Smugs, (though he seems to be somewhat popular amongst readers) though he adds a layer of mistrust if not actual fear or danger. Miss Pepper is suitable strict, yet friendly, in the vein of Miss Dimity perhaps. There are funny bits, sad bits, scary bits and mysterious bits to be found, with a satisfying mystery (especially if you are under 12 and don’t try to pick apart the hows and whys) and the promise of more to come.

The suspicious Mr King

The suspicious Mr King

Next review: The Ring ‘O Bells Mystery

 

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , , | 5 Comments