Wandering in the dark near Kröller Müller — Kunst en Cultuur – Arts & Culture

This link was sent to us from Hans van der Klis from The Netherlands. He says:

 I’ve written an ‘adventure’ story on my blog, that we (my wife and I) experienced during a visit to a museum in the forest. With some thoughts of Enid Blyton influencing my mind, how to handle, how to be prepared with the lessons I have learned in her books.

And so now I’m sharing it for you to read as well.

“Dear visitors, … we’re closing within ten minutes …

Would you be so kind to go direction exit and pick up your coat in the cloakroom. We thank you for your visit and hope to see you again another time.

via Wandering in the dark near Kröller Müller — Kunst en Cultuur – Arts & Culture

P.S. how lovely are the Dutch editions of the Famous Five?

image002

Posted in Personal Experiences | Tagged | 1 Comment

So Many Editions

DSCN0798I can’t be the only one who collects many editions of the same books in their collection. I have spoken to a couple of people who indeed find it hard to pass up different editions of their favourite books and this is just as true with Blytons. In fact even more so, and I want to have a look at why this might be.

Now as Fiona will confirm I have many versions of the same books, mostly Famous Fives (And Malcolm Saville’s Lone Pine adventures) and she doesn’t really get why. The only time she had double copies were because of the comparisons she’s been doing for the blog or to replace her copy that has worn out through no fault of its own.

I on the other hand, tends to scoop up any copy of the the books even if I have a copy, perfectly reasonable and usable at home. I don’t really know why I do pick up the copies but I am up for examining options. So lets get on with this.

  1. Different Editions: :Like all of us in the Blyton fan club we know how much our beloved author has had her work ‘updated’ to keep her in with the politically correct brigade. Names, money, characters even have had their names changed. So as an avid fan I like collecting the different editions, the different imprints to see in a rather studious way, when the changes started to appear in Blyton’s books. Do you?
  2. Presents: When I was younger I got a lot of my Blyton books as presents, in fact I even got one from my primary school crush which I still have. Part of the reason I held on to that on in particular was because it is the story of Five go to Demon’s Rocks with the cover of Five go off in a Caravan on the front. It’s a paperback from Hodder and I would like to think it is rather a rare find. Also I have Five on Kirrin Island Again a couple of times because I had my mid-nineties to early two thousands paperbacks, and my grandmother was always on the look out for them for me and brought me loads from the charity shops and then for my 21st birthday my parents brought me a first edition with dustjacket. I love my first edition, its awesome, but I just can’t really bring myself to part with the books that my grandmother brought me, mostly because she was such a key person in my life, the books still help me feel close to her. Have you had any duplicates as presents?
  3. It’s the only one in the shop: This is my most common one and most despaired by from Fiona. Every time I spot a nice hardback, bound copy of the Famous Five or Malory Towers or even a Malcolm Saville, I really really struggle with putting the book down and walking away. Especially if it’s a lone book in a shop. I tend to be a bit sentimental about the books and think that they need a home, a home with other friends of their kind, not these glossy paperbacks so helpfully donated to charity shops. I feel old books need to be nurtured and Blytons especially so because of the chopping and changing of the text. The older books have had a hard life, probably hidden in attics or at the back of book shelves and really just want to be in a nice comfy house with other books. Right?
  4. Not sure what I have at home: This bugs Fiona no end. She is super organised and has a list of every book she owns, either on a spreadsheet or very carefully catalogued on her Goodreads page (I wish I had her persistence to do such a thing!) The simple truth is I forget a lot of the time what I have at home, what edition and how much I paid for it, so if it’s an especially nice copy, and even with dustjackets and coloured plates I will buy it, whether I think I have it or not. Reasonable don’t you think?
  5. Dustjackets, covers and illustrations: My last reason is, as you may have guessed related to what I said in point four about the dustjackets and coloured plates in the earlier editions. Now I am a sucker for a dustjacket, especially a good condition one, and once brought a Five Run Away Together just for the dustjacket and the coloured plate in the front. I also like to get the ones with different covers, in particular I spent a lot of time trying to gather together each of the 21 Fives with the 1996 TV tie in covers. I have now succeeded, and they are being stored nicely in my room. These covers are sometimes quite tricky to get hold, given that the 90s TV series rather falls off the Blyton radar, and there aren’t all that many copies left. I had a couple when I was younger and the obsession with the Famous Five grew from there. I just had to have them.
    Last but not least, illustrations, who could resist those beautifully drawn pictures by Eileen Soper? They really are something to behold. However I am about to admit to sacrilege here but once I got the Millennium editions from the library and they had coloured illustrations. When I was younger these sparked off my imagination and I desperately started trying to gather them, once again with my nan’s help I gained quite a collection before they quietly disappeared from shelves. I love those ones, they’re my main reading copies and are well loved. I think I’m allowed those!

There we are then, five reasons why I have so many editions of the Famous Five! Sorry it wasn’t the promised blog about cake, but I forgot to make it. I hope you didn’t mind this improvised blog, please let me know what you think and why you have more than one edition of a Blyton book!

Posted in Personal Experiences | Tagged , | 7 Comments

The Ring O’ Bells Mystery

Ring O’ Bells is probably my favourite from this series, but after telling Stef this was what I’d review I had to do a hasty double-check that it was indeed the next in the series. It is, of course, and that makes sense when you know that Rubadub comes later with its progression in the Barney-and-his-mysterious-father storyline. But as always, I doubted myself and decided to check the books. Many books from series have a little list of previous titles in them (though annoyingly, if its a reprint, they may list all books minus the book you have open and leave you none the wiser). Thankfully Blyton often includes a short message to her readers along the line of this book being the third in the series, but each is complete in itself.

So, I checked what Ring O’ Bells said. To my slight surprise the little message reads:

This is the fourth book about Roger, Diana, Snubby and his dog Loony, and Barney and his monkey Miranda.
The other three books are:
The Rockingdown Mystery
The Rilloby Fair Mystery
The Rubadub Mystery

At that point I entirely believed I had been wrong and took The Rubadub Mystery off the shelf too. Inside that reads:

This is the fourth book about Roger, Diana, Snubby and his dog Loony, and Barney and his monkey Miranda.
The other three books in this series are:
The Rockingdown Mystery
The Rilloby Fair Mystery
The Ring O’Bells Mystery…

Clearly they can’t both be right! Common sense then kicked in, and saw that Ring O’ Bells was first printed in this edition in 1953, and reprinted in 1954, while Rubadub’s dates were 1954 and 1955. It would seem that an error has crept into Ring O’ Bells possibly when it was republished. I’m not sure what other differences there are between these editions and the originals, though, as they are both by the same publisher – with just three years in between – and there’s no distinction make on the Enid Blyton Society listing.

Anyway, superior detective skills won, and Ring O’ Bells was the right book. Incidentally, though, the foreword there tells us that Blyton clearly didn’t know what to call the series either! The books are known equally as The Barney Mysteries and The R Mysteries it would seem. Both are much catchier than the Roger, Diana, Snubby and his dog Loony, and Barney and his monkey Miranda Mysteries.


THE ACTUAL STORY

Four hundred or so words ago, I told you this was my favourite in the series, so let’s get back to that. This story has some similar chilling and historical aspects to Rockingdown, though much of it has a fairytale spin.

The most chilling part is the reference to the drowning – though it plays a much smaller part in the story than perhaps I had remembered. It’s a dark little tale, though, and somewhat unusual for Blyton although she had used a similar idea in Rockingdown with the deaths of the children at the manor.

As for the fairy-tales there’s Naomi Barlow, known to the children as Old Red Riding Hood, thanks to her tattered red hooded cloak and cottage in the woods. Despite it saying many times that she has white curly hair in addition to the witch-green eyes, I have always pictured her as a much younger woman.

Naomi Barlow aka Old Red Riding Hood

Naomi Barlow aka Old Red Riding Hood

There’s also Mother Hubbard, though like Old Red Riding Hood this is a nickname bestowed upon her by the children. It’s mostly just because she lives at Hubbard Cottage, but is compounded by the fact that she – gasp – has a cupboard! The fact that it’s a larder full of food is irrelevant, but the children’s reaction makes you wonder how rare cupboards were in those days!

Then there’s the myths and legends surrounding the bells at Ring O’ Bells Hall which apparently rang out to warn of enemies in the past. ROB Hall is a typical Blytonian hall, meaning it not only boasts a hiding-niche up a fireplace and a secret passage behind a panel but also a stern and unpleasant curator who wishes to keep out riff-raff such as inquisitive children and their dogs.

These are all things which have graced many of her books. Talking of which – the reason they are in ROB Village is they have had the ‘flu  (after four! weeks of Easter hols) and have therefore been instructed by the doctor to go somewhere they can relax and have a ‘change of air’. This time it’s not sea-air or mountain-air they need though (who knew different types of air was so important?) so they end up going to a different village than the one they live in for this change of air.

Secret passages (especially ones behind sliding panels) are practically a staple in Blyton’s adventure worlds, but this one shares similarities to two that feature in Famous Five books. One similarity is with Five Go Off to Camp and a brick wall, the other to Five Have a Mystery to Solve and one entrance to the cave of treasures. Actually, it’s also very similar to the Craggy Tops’ entrance to the undersea tunnel in Island of Adventure when it comes to that.

Old Grandad could be straight out of any number of stories as an old bearded fellow of indeterminate but great age who can tell of past tales and legends. There’s Yan’s Grandad from Five Go Down to the Sea, Great-Grandad from Five on Finniston Farm, Jeremiah Boogle from Five Go to Demon’s Rocks… 

Old Grandad. Not to be confused with Yan's Grandad or Great-Grandad or any other patriarchal figures.

Old Grandad. Not to be confused with Yan’s Grandad or Great-Grandad or any other patriarchal figures.

Ringing the bells to wake the village and get help to the hall is an idea that is used again in Five Go to Demon’s Rocks – both scenes have quite an impact it has to be said.

Unfortunately, perhaps, in Ring O’ Bells old-fashioned attitudes towards women are quite prevalent – including in this bell-ringing scenario. I tend not to notice this too much as I don’t believe Blyton was a raging sexist – George shows she was quite the opposite – but there are several instances of women being portrayed firmly as the weaker sex.

Diana is not in the hall when Barney rings the bells as she has willingly agreed to stay home, rather too afraid to go though she feels she ought to. It’s debatable whether the boys would have let her go anyway. She’s also absent from exploring the passage from the end in the woods. Instead she often gets to be the one to help make up the lunches and do other chores. When the bells ring dogs bark, cows low, cats flee, men throw back the bedcovers and leap out and women? The women scream! It’s also Diana who is the first to go white and weak after their first day of exerting themselves.


MY THOUGHTS

After saying that this is my favourite of the series, I have to admit that the mystery/ adventure elements are perhaps not Blyton’s strongest. It’s a fairly straight-forward tale of hearing noises in the night (much like at Rockingdown), investigating a tunnel and finding a dead-end, a little chatting to people in-the-know of these things, some further and more exciting tunnel exploring, and then a finale which somewhat redeems the story. I say somewhat as although both Roger and Barney are trapped by the criminals it’s for a very short time and they are never in any true danger.

It still remains my favourite, though, thanks to the added history and fairy-tales woven into the story.

620wide+4931836

Next review: The Rilloby Fair Mystery

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Welcome to Monday

Hope you’ve all had a good weekend –  hasn’t the English weather been glorious (especially in the south) this weekend? I’ve been out and got myself a little tan, and all my freckles are finding their way out!

Anyway the blogs for this week are a look at The Ring O’ Bells Mystery from Fiona to go with the rest of her Barney series reviews, we have a reblog to do for you from a fan who emailed us last week, which we are looking forward to, and I think I am going to try a recipe for seed cake that I found at work. I’m pretty certain that seed cake was mentioned in one of Blyton’s books, somewhere!

Hope you’re up for a smashing blog week! I shall leave you with some of my favourite pictures from last week, which I do admit mostly includes bluebells. Hope you love them as much as I do!

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

The River of Adventure

I know it’s been a while since I have reviewed any of the Adventure Series books but I know where I got up to, and that was River. So without waiting another second it’s time to have a look at the final Adventure series book and find out what trouble Philip, Jack, Dinah and Lucy-Ann get up to.

I think its fair to say that River of Adventure is possibly one of the weaker books of the series, and in the same vein as Five are Together Again, it tends to be the least favourite of the fans. The plot does tend to feel like a mash up of previous ones, the children being unable to go back to school, the unexpected trip out of town with Bill and in this case Aunt Allie, the bad guy is searching for an underground treasure and the adults are conveniently captured so the children can go on and find the treasure trove by accident.

It’s a fairly standard end of the line plot really, it is as if Blyton couldn’t find an further ways to grow her characters and find new adventures for them. I’m a bit hazy on her personal timeline but a quick check on the Enid Blyton Society website tells me that it could be understandable that Blyton was a bit distracted at this time as she was having to start legal proceedings to stop the rumours that she didn’t write her own books. In that instance we could probably forgive her for being a little less absorbed in coming up with adventures for her books.

Anyway back to the adventure; the whole reason for the children being anywhere near this middle eastern ‘river of adventure’ is because of Bill and his work. He is tracking someone called Raya Uma who is a jack of all trades as far as criminal business is concerned and is after some highly valuable treasure that is apparently hidden in the desert. Bill takes his wife and the children for his cover, to appear to be a family man on holiday while doing all he can to catch Raya Uma. However as I’m sure you can guess, best laid plans and all that, it all goes wrong for Bill and Aunt Allie as they’re kidnapped by Raya Uma and his men.

The children then ally themselves with the boat driver and a young boy from the local ‘sinny-town’ (Cinema town, you know a big fake place like on a Hollywood movie set?). During this excitement Philip ends up with a poisonous snake that has had its venom ducts removed which means it is essentially harmless, and avid readers of the book will know that the snake does save the day.

However back to the plot. I must admit I didn’t ‘gel’ with it, it was very sporadic when moving from scene to scene and although it had been touched by Blyton’s magic, the fact that once again the children had managed to find undiscovered treasure had lost its shine by this point. The plot is overused and sloppy in places, the motions are just that, motions. There is nothing new to surprise the reader, especially if they have read all the others. As usual I may be being too hard on it as its a children’s book and I am an adult (how I hate admitting that), but I think even as a child I knew when a book didn’t quite fit in. I knew that Five as Together Again was not as strong and instead was quite boring compared to the others, and its the same with The River of Adventure.

However I know that any book written by Blyton has a magic about it, and that’s not to say it’s well written but it just doesn’t sparkle as much as the others. You may disagree with me, and you may like to fill me in on what I am missing! I just think that the last book of Blyton’s series are the ones that suffer most from over used plot lines and predictability.

One last point on River of Adventure is that if you look at the first editions or at least those published before 1953 Kiki, our favourite parrot, would screech “God save the King” quite happily. In River this changes to “God save the Queen” as it was two years since Queen Elizabeth the second had been crowned and the phrase was changed to fit into the times. However I’m not too sure how well you could convince a parrot like Kiki to change her favourite saying, but if anyone could it would be Jack and Philip.

So there you are, those are my thoughts on the River of Adventure. What do you think? Do you agree with me or not? Let us know in the comments or write us a blog saying why not!

First edition dustjacket

Fiona has also reviewed this series, starting here.

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

My twenty-second Noddy book: Cheer Up Little Noddy

This Noddy book has been the hardest to review. It was supposed to be my 18th review from the series, but when I opened my copy I discovered that it was missing the first 20 pages. I then added a copy from eBay to my Christmas list, and my mum bought me it. Unfortunately, it turned out to be the cover from Cheer Up Little Noddy… and the contents of Noddy Goes to Sea! The copy I’m finally going to review came all the way from Alton and was bought for me by Stef. Needless to say I asked her if it had all pages and matching contents and cover before I let her part with any money!

520wide+6530027


THE STORY

Noddy’s day starts with washing his car, but right away you could see trouble was coming.

Little Tubby Bear and Tommy Bear are watching and admiring his car and Tommy Bear says he can drive. Uh-oh. Noddy is silly enough to let them sit in his car. Double uh-oh.

Naturally, being naughty teddies they drive off in his car and it ends up smashed to pieces. For once, a catastrophe has occurred that isn’t truly Noddy’s fault and everyone is very sympathetic. Mr Golly takes the car for repair and various toys come to visit Noddy with jam tarts and chocolates.

Little Tubby has been spanked by his parents for his behaviour and is to give up what is in his piggy bank towards the repairs. Tommy Bear has run off. (No-one seems to be particularly concerned about a missing child, or a case of grand theft auto, however.)

Noddy’s plan (conceived with Big Ears who is a much brainier chap) is to barrow a borrow…  no, morrow a barrow tomarrow… um, temporarily use a wheeled box to ferry shopping and things for people at sixpence a go.

In a place like Toy Village this sort of venture can only be a success. Toys always have a spare sixpence for someone else to do a boring or time-consuming chore for them. I actually wonder how anyone manages to catch a train or get their shopping home when Noddy’s on holiday or on a day off or without his car for whatever reason. Despite there being enough traffic for Mr Plod to have to control it nobody else (or at least none of the regular characters) seem to own any sort of vehicle. And I’m looking too deeply into a fantasy toy-world created for small children, I know that.

Anyway, the barrow-jobs turn out to be hard-going on Noddy due to lots of heavy loads. He upgrades to a hand-cart after a day or two, but even then he’s tired out as everyone is giving him jobs as they think it’s helpful. Big Ears thinks about getting a horse to help, only he doesn’t know anyone with a horse… And straight away a travelling saucepan sales man comes along, with a donkey.


NODDY AND THE SAUCEPAN MAN

As happens fairly often with Blyton, this is a little cross-over, or cameo if you will. Big-Ears calls him the Old Saucepan Man, and he wears a saucepan on his head. The constant clattering of the pots and pans has made him quite deaf as well. I’ve not got around to reading the Enchanted Wood/Faraway Tree books yet but even I know that this is the same Saucepan Man that appears there.

DSCN4906

All too conveniently the Saucepan Man is looking for someone to look after Ee-Aw his donkey while he goes off visiting his aunt, Katie Kettle. Despite having thought about getting Noddy a horse not two pages ago, Big-Ears is outraged. He has no where to keep a donkey! It takes until the Saucepan Man has gone off in a huff before he thinks to let Noddy have the donkey and solve two problems at once.

Not much really happens after that. Noddy goes back to working, using Ee-Aw to pull the cart, and apart from one upset when Bumpy-Dog send Ee-Aw running off, it goes well. Saucepan Man then comes back for Ee-Aw unexpectedly early, but it’s fine as Noddy’s car is repaired and life can go back to normal.

Tommy Bear never turns up again, incidentally.


After waiting so long to read this, it turned out to be a bit of a disappointment.

 

 

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , | 2 Comments

First Monday of May

It’s May now, not that the recent weather would lead you to believe that. For me the last week of April was not a case of April Showers. It was a case of repeated hail showers and then a reasonably heavy snow fall. I can only hope spring returns with May!

Anyway, at least the weather won’t stop us blogging.

Wednesday4 (2)

Thanks to Stef I have now acquired two of the three Noddy books I was missing, so I can return to reviewing them now, while Stef is going to finish the Adventure Series and we have a reblog on Sunday all the way from The Netherlands.

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Last Term at Malory Towers: Audio Adaptation

So here we are at the last audio adaptation of Malory Towers. Its been a rather short run of these audio comparisons but with only six volumes in the series, how could we expect more? Maybe I shall have to bite my tongue and read the Pamela Cox continuation novels and bring you some reviews of those. Anyway, on to the actual adaptation.

The introduction of the last term begins with Darrell at home, just about to leave for Malory Towers for the last time. She runs out to the car where her father is waiting impatiently for his daughters to appear.This is the first time we actually hear her father speak, and her mother is absent. In the books, both parents and Sally join Darrell and Felicity in the car to Malory Towers. I suppose that because she doesn’t say much that for the audio adaptation to keep to time it is just as simple to leave her out altogether than to squeeze her in.

The journey to Malory Towers is short and bittersweet because we all know this is the last one but even before we arrive at the wonderful world of Malory Towers we are being introduced to more new characters. In the last term there is a focus on the younger girls who can still get up to lots of mischief where the older girls, Darrell etc, can’t. Felicity and her friends in the second form make up the focus of a lot of the book. The character we’re introduced to in the beginning of the Last Term is someone called Josephine Jones. It seems that the girls in the car are all aware of her and she has been at Malory Towers for at least one term. Jo, as she’s usually called, has an appalling father and a very high opinion of herself which later on becomes her downfall.

One of the issues with Jo’s story is that when it comes to the money aspect of it (her parents are very wealthy) the PC brigade has been in and decided that they need to change five pounds in old money into ten pounds sterling as it’s assumed the listeners will not realise the time in which the story is set and have no idea of the currency change. As a purist it is these kinds of changes that make some the magic disappear from Blyton’s novels. The assumption that children wouldn’t think that five whole pounds was a lot of money is ridiculous. When I was the right age for these five pounds felt like a fortune, and all right when I was eight or so five pounds could get you a lot more, so much more that Jo’s ten pounds felt like a fortune! What really is the need for that sort of change? It’s just pedantic.

The next thing I want to talk about it the complete removal of a character from the adaptation. In the adaptation there is one new girl, the sports loving Amanda Chartlow (or Shoutalot, if you’re Mam’zelle Dupont) who plays a big part in the story, especially in regards to the second form and the bumptious June’s wake up call to stop just being the class clown. However in the book there are two new girls in the sixth form, one of them being Mam’zelle Rougier’s niece Suzanne who has come all the way from France to learn some English customs. Although Suzanne does not add much plot to the book, she is in a way the comic relief, and is another link to the second form as she adores the tricks they play on the Mam’zelles.

In regards to Amanda Chartlow, who is superb at games from a famous games school, her parts are mostly still intact. However there are some big jumps in her storyline with Alicia’s cousin June, such as the conversation where Amanda offers to coach June in tnnis and swimming, but it is more or less all there. Amanda is a very dominating character and although it comes through in the audio, it is very much lacking in line with the book.

When the audio starts drawing to the end, we don’t really get the full whack of feeling that Darrell’s leaving causes us in the book; the sombre walk around the school, having to say goodbye to everything and making Felicity promise to carry the standard high. Its a very touching part of the book, and really its lost in the audio where this part is cut out in favour of instrumental music.

It’s not the best Malory Towers adaptation, that probably has to go to the fifth, but its good because in a way there isn’t much from the book it doesn’t cover, the change in money is annoying to those of us in the know, and the exclusion of Suzanne is just frankly ridiculous when you could have cut some of the time from the instrumental music to fill in those parts. As always it’s little things, but if they get children wanting to read the books, well then, that’s the best we can hope for.

I will say however, even though I’ve been looking at these critically they are still full of nostalgia for me, and they do just confirm my love for Malory Towers. Oh how I wish I had been to that school! Long live Malory Towers!

620wide+7874851

This is the last book in the series so there is no ‘next review’ but you can read a review of the Last Term novel here.

Posted in Audio Books and Audio Dramatisations | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

The Secret Series on TV – Moon Castle

The previous episode went for a very modern sci-fi feel, which was miles away from the original story. This time around they seem to have gone for a ghostly one, which doesn’t sound all that far from the book, but manages to be entirely different all the same.

It actually reminds me of a couple of Murder She Wrote episodes, namely A Killing In Cork and Nan’s Ghost. That would be partially down to the location – which just so happens to be Ireland… yes, Ireland. I think I’d better go back to the beginning, hadn’t I?


THE OPENING SCENE

Charlotte is to visit and write about some Irish castles and so invited the Arnold crew plus Ruby along. (Why four children of that age need a nanny when they are travelling with their father and another adult is not clear.)

Castle #1 on the list just so happens to be Caislean Geall. Sorry, I mean Moon Castle, though both names are on the sign. Caislean, as I imagined, means castle, but geall seems to mean pledge or wager. Google Translate tells me that the Irish for moon is, er, moon, but elsewhere I’m seeing it as gealach or gealai so geall isn’t far from that.

Castle Wager/ Moon Castle is set up as being haunted by the opening scene with a ghostly horseman (and random drunk shouting SEAMMMUUSSSS!) It is also surrounded by what looks like the bog of eternal stench, but is later revealed to be a mostly harmless peat-bog.

The not-headless horseman

The not-headless horseman


THE O’MOONS?

A chap who I assumed to be Guy Brimming is angry with a woman I took to be Mrs Brimming, the caretaker. He is furious that she has advertised the castle for rent, but she argues that it will be fine. She’s lonely there as not a soul ever visits. This is in opposition to the book, where Mrs B (and her two sisters) as well as Guy don’t want anyone in the castle.

As it turns out these two are actually Mrs (or Ma) O’Moon and Fin O’Moon. Because you’re not Irish enough without an O in front of your name! They are the same characters though, just re-named. They must own the castle, as their ancestor Fin Bar O’Moon is mentioned a lot. Mrs O is dressed up like a vampire practically, I just have to add that.

mrsomoon

Mrs O’Moon

Fin is still a mad scientist type, but he seems to be working alone to produce a ‘magic potion’ – I kid you not, those are the words used. The cat laps some up and leaps from the top of the tower without injury, so we’re definitely into something weird.


TWANG, DONG, PLINK AND HONK

That unsettles the Arnolds as they arrive, especially Laura who thinks the castle doesn’t want them there. Unsurprisingly she is the one to harp on about ghosts the whole time. It doesn’t help that for the majority of the episode she is the only one to see green eyes lighting up in the portrait or the ghostly horseman outside. Though she says “it looked at me,” instead of “a green light shone from the eyes” so everyone thinks she’s just being silly.

Lots of weird things do happen, though, sort of like in the book. Suits of armour fall over. The musical instruments do indeed go TWANG and DONG, but also PLINK and HONK. It’s so terrifying that Ruby manages to fall down some stairs and hurts her knee. That’s the perfect excuse for Mrs O to give her some of the magic, (sometimes smoking), luminous green potion. Ruby not only thinks that’s entirely normal but also quite delicious.

Here, have some lovely green juice.

Here, have some lovely green juice.

Unfortunately for Ruby it only serves to make her battier than ever – she has extreme amounts of energy and almost flies over the bog, then later nearly dances off a cliff.

Back to the ‘weird things’ though, and lots of the Arnolds’ things go missing. A cassette player, a teddy, a cardigan, socks… Laura naturally blames the ghost. There are mini-earthquakes that send books flying from the shelves.

Mrs O blames pretty much everything on the castle being built on a bog. IT’S THE SUBSIDENCE! is heard a half-dozen times at least. But in private, she blames Fin, who denies pretty much everything.


THE SOLUTION

The children’s leaps of logic are quite astounding, really. They realise that someone came in to open their curtains so that they were guaranteed to see the horseman in the middle of the night. That must mean that someone is trying to scare them off. And you know what THAT means. There MUST be a secret passage in their room! This has slight hints of the book where the curtains are deliberately drawn so that someone can sneak in and access the secret passage there, but the children take their time to mull it over and come to a clever solution to a puzzle. They also decide that there must be someone else involved, someone who goes up into the tower where Fin and Mrs O say they can’t go as there is no key.

As with pretty much every episode my attention waned around this point. I must have been forty or fifty minutes in – the episodes are a ridiculous hour and a quarter or something. Anyway, they find the secret passage, some of them get kidnapped, Prince gets ill, Ruby gets kidnapped or trapped with the children. there’s more earthquakes, and then there’s some reveals about who is involved with the mystery in what capacity.

The green stuff is a potion for eternal life… or eternal youth, something like that. The mastermind is actually Ma O’Moon herself, and she brought the Arnolds in to test the potion on them, to make sure it was safe for her to take.

She and Fin argue over it all and it turns out Fin did the object stealing and horse-riding to try to scare the Arnolds away. He didn’t want them to end up like ‘the others’ who jumped from the tower believing they could fly. Ma isn’t best impressed when he denies the twang dongs etc. For some reasons she still says ITS THE SUBSIDENCE again for good measure and he insists IT’S FIN BAR HIMSELF.

And it turns out he’s right. There really is a ghostly presence, and it’s Fin Bar their ancestor who wants them to stop their bad ways. He even talks to them through the painting to say NO MORE.


MY THOUGHTS

So that is the main ‘plot’ of the episode, not that it makes a great deal of sense. There is also a Charlotte/Thaddeus sub plot, naturally. This time it’s more romantic than dramatic. Long story short, Charlotte proposes (I think we should get married, Thaddeus. Everyone thinks we’re a couple, and it would save on bedrooms  – but I suspect some of it was tongue in cheek, or I hope so at least) and Thaddeus pretty much does a runner. She goes looking for him and thus they miss much of the action at the castle while they mope and brood and argue. I predicted them having a relationship from the first episode, so this is hardly surprising, though there has been few, if any, romantic moments or anything official on them dating before this. It’s almost Bill and Allie-ish in the lacking romance department.

It takes just a little bit of over-dramaticness – Charlotte sliding down a tiny cliff – for Thaddeus to realise he does want to marry her after all.

And now, for the things that I couldn’t work into a plot synopsis.

Jack finally gets adopted into the Arnold family at the start as all the official paperwork has come through. Took them long enough!

Mike barely features in this episode – remember he was laid up in bed for most of Killimooin as well! This time he swaps places with Tom the gypsy boy. Tom wants to go visit a castle and Mike would rather go to the horse show with Tom’s father, so he’s there for two minutes at the start and end. It doesn’t make much difference either way as all the children are pretty interchangeable.

There’s so much melodrama it’s ridiculous. Laura is about to fall into the bog? NOOOOOO, cue slow-mo running. That’s Fin this time, but the children use shouting NO as a primary method of stopping things. Like Ruby falling off a cliff, or drinking more potion. And it’s entirely ineffective.  Prince tries to do a Lassie and fetch help and instead causes Thaddeus and Charlotte to drive off the road. Ruby nearly dances off the castle tower at the end, only to be SUNG down by Laura. But of course she slips anyway. For the drama.

NOT_THE_BOG

And lastly, we need to update our geography maps badly. They seem to drive from Spiggy Holes to Moon Castle. I think they’re trying to pretend that it’s all been set in England the whole time. Even so, they still drive from ‘England’ to ‘Ireland’ without so much as a mention of a ferry.

I think on the whole we can call this another ridiculous instalment and move on. They cut the Brimming sisters, turned the scary and creepy moments into melodrama, there’s no Prince Paul, no mines with men in suits, no pins and needles… all so they could write their own stuff about potions for eternal life (which turn your shed skin cells green – a Bad Science candidate for sure) and add real ghosts and a bog which seemed at first to be important and then had nothing to do with anything.

 

Posted in Blyton on Screen | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Monday

Here we are, another Monday, another week into the year, and we here at Word of Blyton aren’t quite sure what this week will bring you.

Fiona will try and get another TV epsiode of the Secret Series done and compared for you this week, and I think I shall end up with the last in the series of the audio comparisons of Malory Towers. So looking at the changes and cuts made to Last Term at Malory Towers.

I think thats all from me this Monday I’m afraid, we’ve not got any exciting news at the moment, but I hope you’ll all be back for our blogs this week!!!

I shall leave you with some pictures from my recent walk in our somewhat nicer weather than we have been having this week. Hope you like them!

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 1 Comment

In the Fifth at Malory Towers: Audio Adaptation

620wide+8751529

We’re almost at the end of these comparisons, mostly because there was only ever six to do with Malory Towers. In the Fifth is my second favourite Malory Towers book, the first being The Third Year at Malory Towers. The reason why In the Fifth is only my second favourite is because I didn’t read it until much later in my Enid Blyton reading.

In fact that is probably why the Fifth is one of my favourites, when I reading the book the girls were the right age for me to relate to in my tender teenage years. I could see why they decided to treat the new girl Maureen Little the way they did. This part has made it into the taped adaptation I have, but I have no idea on whether it would have been edited or removed from the later versions as the way the girls handle Maureen can be seen as cruel and in fact, is a form of bullying. However it being a Blyton book and Maureen being one of the ‘bad’ girls and everyone else being ‘good’ as a youngster you get away with the scenes as it just means that everyone is being put in their place.

As an adult however the handling of Maureen, Catherine and Gwen is uncomfortable to listen to, let alone read the full descriptions of ‘taking them down a peg’. In fact the attitude of our ‘good’ girls is hardly anything spectacular. Blyton might have included that to show that even though there are silly people in the word, not everyone is one thing or the other. I know now that life, even for the ‘good’ and ‘bad’ people is never as easy as it seems. People aren’t all bad and people aren’t all good. We all deal with things differently and perhaps the way the fifth dealt with Maureen, Gwen and Catherine was them trying to deal with things in a very young way. In fact the first suggestion is to act scornfully towards them but this was turned down in favour of laughter. The acting out of it can be a bit lacking in intensity and drama, whereas the book gives the full whack. I never realized the seriousness of the situation when I was younger and through the audio, but being older and having read the book, I see the horridness behind the actions.

The cassette covers things quite closely in this one, though there are swathes of text cut and more instrumental music to fill in long gaps where the narrator walks you through the book. The Fifth is one of the better adapted novels as the plot does not jump about from chapter to chapter and follows a main story arc. This holds it together better throughout the audio experience and things to not seem quite so random in this one. Perhaps it is because we know the characters better or that I just know the book by heart I know whats happening in-between the segments of text. As a once first time listener with no idea of what the book said these audios do work well, but now as a seasoned Blytonite, the world from the books has become my life and the most important thing about it was the description that Blyton included in her books. I loved that we got more of a flavour about the characters in the books, and little glimpses of character that were somehow lost in the audio. It was through the books that I began to fall in love and enjoy the characters even more!

One of the nicest things about In the Fifth is that when the Fifth form perform their pantomime, and go through rehearsals, we get to hear parts of ‘Darrell’s’ script. Of course these aren’t really included in the book and must have been put in by the script writer but they really do make the whole idea of the fifth putting on a pantomime more or less realistic. It is a performance I would have paid any silly amount of money to see; I really would. I’m sure it was the performance of a life time for the girls, and through the audio we get to experience a little bit of that magic.

As I’ve said, this has to be one of my favourite audios, and even though like the rest of them, it has its plot cut about to condense it into an hours performance, the result is a pleasing one. A lot of it is down to the actors of course, and perhaps needing more ‘oomph’ in their plummy acting, but still these are the girls of Malory Towers, they’re learning to become proper ladies!

Next review: Last Term at Malory Towers: Audio adaptation

Or read a review of the In the Fifth novel here.

Posted in Audio Books and Audio Dramatisations | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Twins at St Clare’s – How has Blyton’s original text fared in a modern edition? part 6

This week (after abandoning this series for over a month) I got through two chapters. That leaves just five to go. Earlier posts – one, two, three, four and five.


CHAPTER FIFTEEN: A TERRIBLE QUARREL

The class-related discussions suffer from the most updating in this chapter. There are one or two slightly uncomfortable moments, where the St Clare’s girls look down on Sheila for being ‘new-money’ (though that phrase is never used). Saying that, it is made clear that they don’t care that she’s not always been rich, but that she hasn’t been honest about her situation and has pretended to be something she’s not. That may still sound horrible, but Sheila was one to constantly brag about her house and servants… and well, that’s where the edits start to creep in so I will get on with documenting them.

Sheila brags (or indeed swanks) about her marvellous home and the number of servants they keep, and her horse, and their three motor-cars. This gets changed to her marvellous home, and her horse, and their three cars. Obviously nobody nowadays is allowed to have servants, but the least they could do was make it staff. Very rich people still pay people to cook and clean for them! Also, three cars is hardly boarding-school bragging material now. I would think that having only three cars might be a shameful point.

Likewise, Janet’s speech about Sheila’s bragging gets cut up. She had said you talk about your servants and your Rolls-Royce cars, your house and your lake and goodness knows what – and then you talk like the daughter of the dustman! and now it is you talk about your house, and your cars, your horse and your lake and goodness knows what – and then you talk like a barrow-boy.

Again, that could have been staff rather than servants and Rolls-Royce is still a well-known luxury car brand. Or they could have had Janet mention their Bugatti Veyrons or Porches of course, if they wanted something more ‘now’. Also, I’m not sure how barrow-boy is less offensive or classist than daughter of a dustman.  I suppose that there are likely to be daughters of bin-men reading, and not so many barrow-boys but the classism is still there. I’m not entirely sure it’s that classist, even. It would be like saying ‘you waltz around like you’re the queen and then talk like you’re from a council estate’. It’s not polite, but it points out an incongruity.

Janet also says that decent people don’t use some of the phrases Sheila does. This has been changed to simply that people don’t. I suppose they felt that it wasn’t fair to imply people who don’t speak ‘well’ aren’t decent, but that’s Janet’s opinion and not a fact.

I sort of agree with one change, however. Initially Sheila knew she wasn’t as good as the others [because she was born poor]. This has been changed to she thought she wasn’t as good. I think that’s a positive change as Sheila isn’t any less good than girls who were lucky to be born into wealthy families. She might not be as nice as them, or have other skills they do, but she isn’t a lesser person for that. Though saying that, Sheila ‘knowing’ something is still a very personal thing. She could ‘know’ she is not as good and yet be entirely wrong.

After all that there are still a few minor changes to mention. The habit of removing some italics continues, though the majority are left. So what is the matter with her? loses much of its emphasis. ‘What is the matter with her?’ sounds like a very casual question. With the is highlighted, however, it makes the speaker sound quite flummoxed.

Good heavens is used twice in the chapter, both times the newer edition makes it Good Heavens. I can’t say I particularly agree with that. Then again I’m not a fan of he’ etc getting capitals when it’s to do with God.

The gramophone is again ‘updated’ to a record player – I’m sure I’ve already queried why Pat and Isabel aren’t putting their i-Pods into a dock to play music.

Queer becomes strange and every one quite rightly becomes everyone as it refers to people.

There are also two things left in that seem strange. Janet, in another rant, says goodness knows how many servants and cars and that is left unedited – the only reference to servants which isn’t removed. They also leave twopence in (I can’t remember the exact wording now but it was as in ‘I don’t care twopence for her) when usually now it’s tuppence.


CHAPTER SIXTEEN: SHEILA DOES HER BIT

And then, after all that, I could only find one change to this chapter. It’s hardly worth mentioning, really. Very left-out becomes very left out. That’s it.


I make that as nine changes – all in chapter 15. That brings us to 72 in total.

Posted in Updating Blyton's Books | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Monday

Ristorante5 (1)

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Famous Five 90s Style: Five Are Together Again

Now the general consensus from Blytonites is that Five Are Together Again is one of the weakest series endings to come from Blyton, and that it really isn’t the best adventure the Five could have ended on. If you think the book is poor, then maybe its easier to understand why there are so many changes to the script in this one. Its almost like a completely new adventure based on the bones of the original –  a little like Five Have a Wonderful Time –  except no broken leg had to be accommodated this time.

So many of you know that the basis of this book is; the Kirrin cousins go to stay with Tinker Hayling because George’s parents are in quarantine for scarlet fever because Joan the cook has come down with the illness. However in the 90s adaptation the children have just been sent to stay with Tinker while his father stays with the Kirrins as the two professors need to work. The Five and Tinker are left without adult supervision as the Hayling’s cook/housekeeper is no where to be seen! Once again it’s left to Julian to be the responsible one, making Marco Williamson’s Julian even harder to like as he assumes the air of superiority. It really doesn’t help the case for Julian not being seen as a bossy boots at all!

The biggest change to the story line is the introduction of the Japanese garden, where a lot of the action seems to take place in the adaptation. In the book Kirrin Island is the destination chosen by George to hide the papers that had been stolen. The Japanese garden doesn’t seem even half as safe as Kirrin Island does, even if you know the end of the story (I must admit I have a hazy memory of it but I haven’t read it in years) but I suspect the change in story had to come from the fact that the production company Zenith had pulled out of the series by the time the second series came around. So the use of some of the sets was pulled, which obviously made it harder to follow some of the story lines to a T.

The framework of the plot is there, but there is a lot that just doesn’t feel right. It doesn’t really flow, and the weakest book seems to have translated into the weakest TV episode. The use of the chimp Charlie was very well done –  he wasn’t over or under used but his comic element wasn’t really there mostly I suppose because of time. Even with a poor plot like Together Again, 25 minutes is not enough to convey the proper comedic timings or various characters. There are some good scenes in the book of flare ups between Tinker and the others, not to mention Jenny the housekeeper and Professor Hayling. Also the discovery of the ransacked study in the tower at the bottom of the Hayling’s garden is much less dramatic than in the books. Instead of an anguished howl from the professor it’s sort of met by flat disbelief from the Five who discover the mess.

Tinker also seems to have lost a few brain cells in this one and starts acting like a child once again, even though he is clearly as old as the rest of the Five. I would like to take a moment here to note that James Tomlinson is one of the only guest stars to return over the two series. He appears once in Demon’s Rocks which is in series one and then again in this episode which is filmed in series two. The rest of the guest stars, if they gave reoccurring episodes are kept within the same series. I wish I knew why! In fact the change in Five Have a Wonderful Time from Jo to Sniffer is still a mystery to me (however, you can see my theory to why that would have taken place here).

There is the added distraction and farce of the two Tapper clowns who just seem to be scene stealers, and though it doesn’t take much, give Anne the creeps until she mysteriously decides that they’re all right at the end of the episode. I’m pretty sure that the clowns don’t appear much in the books (Fiona’ll tell me if I’m wrong I’m sure!) so they seem rather an odd choice to add into an already skewed episode.

As ever the Five come through and it’s all laughs at the end. You may be able to tell I am not a huge fan of this particular episode or book for that matter and that is rare for me. I do feel, however, that you just can’t win them all, and this is one that was possibly better somewhere in the middle of the series than at the end of it. We needed a more dramatic ending I think, something that really sends the series of books and TV shows off with a good shove! Fingers crossed for a still to be discovered hidden book somewhere that rounds it off? I know I’d enjoy that!

So that concludes my Famous Five 90s style blogs. If you’re still interested I may look at the 70s episodes compared to the books. Let me know in the comments if that’s worth me doing!

23

Posted in Blyton on Screen | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Rilloby Fair Mystery

I did much better in reading the second book in the series, and read it over a couple of days this time. Again, I had picked it up quite naturally to read for myself and not for blogging which I think helped.

Last time I wrote The Barney Mysteries (or R Mysteries as they’re also known) are of a similar nature to The Famous Five, The Adventure Series and the Secret Series. They never venture too far afield but each book takes place somewhere new, during a holiday. And it turns out I wasn’t quite right. I had entirely forgotten that Rilloby Fair takes place within cycling distance of Roger and Diana’s home village. It’s also a bit more like a Find-Outers story, as it’s investigating crimes rather than falling into an adventure.

620wide+4498325


THE MAIN STORY

The basic premise is that there have been several unusual burglaries in the local newspaper. They are unusual as it is old papers and letters that have been taken, and there’s no apparent way a thief could have gotten in or out  – a series of locked-room mysteries. Roger, Diana and Snubby get involved because Great-Uncle Robert is staying with the Lyntons and he is an expert in old papers.

It’s Diana that has the big brainwave, about a fair being near the locations of the thefts and so they begin their ‘find-outing’ by visiting the fair and generally snooping around. Barney just so happens to be working with that fair, which helps! They’re even clever enough to predict the next burglaries, and are able to visit Marloes Castle before the crime is committed to do their research.

They also do Blyton-worthy midnight trips to the castle to try to catch the criminals in action, though in the end it is only Snubby and Looney who manage this as the others are laid up from eating dodgy fair sausages.

487wide+7728234


AND THE SECONDARY STORY

Running through the story is a sub-plot whereby Snubby, having met Great-Uncle Robert on a train and having no clue who he was, weaves a story about being on the run from the Green Hands Gang. Great-Uncle, being exceptionally clever about old documents and apparently very stupid about everything else, believes every word and so when green gloves do turn up amongst the clues he is most shocked. This makes it even more Find-Outerish as it is very like Fatty to stuff up Mr Goon with nonsense about red-headed delivery boys and such like. It’s also a little like the Find-Outers putting out fake clues for PC Pippin, then realising they have created confusion with a real crime. Snubby implies the made-up Green Hands Gang has something to do with the crimes, when the green gloves have an entirely different origin.


MY THOUGHTS

I’m sure I read this when I was much younger and I didn’t work out who-dunnit or indeed how-dunnit then. Reading it this time I knew who the actual thief was (but I couldn’t remember exactly who was or was not the mastermind) so I could see the careful laying of clues and hints along the way. Blyton may get a bad rap for her writing, but you can’t accuse her of presenting a solution to a mystery without having laid the plans for it first.

I remember spotting it first when the children talk to Barney about the fair-folk, and if anyone would have the knowledge to steal valuable documents. They also ask him if anyone collects things, like antiques, for example, and he tells them someone collects toy animals. He doesn’t believe this to be of any consequence, it’s a throw-away comment as it’s a laughable notion that the collector could be a thief, and yet it turns out to be an important clue later on.

Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! 

I won’t tell you who the thief is, but if you want a clue and don’t mind a spoiler: the thief and solution are also used in Five Are Together Again. (But not half as well!)

Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! Spoilers! 

I wouldn’t say we see much in the way of character development again. Diana at least gets to be the clever one on occasion, and Roger makes the most of a Julian-like tendency of ordering her to go/stay home and be out of the way of any danger. Snubby is the same as ever and is quite lucky that his silly stories don’t reach Mr Lyton as he is a surly character prone to thrashing children who don’t behave! It’s very 1940s but I find him quite unlikeable, really. Uncle Quentin at least had a scientific temperament as an excuse – he would blow up and then forget all about it. Mr Lynton is much colder and more calculating, and doesn’t seem to relish his own children’s presence half the time!

We get a little more insight into Barney’s life during the book, as he thinks about how he doesn’t really belong anywhere. He knows that he and Snubby both have lost their parents, but he feels that at least Snubby ‘belongs’ with the Lytons, where as he has nowhere he can call home.

I enjoyed re-reading this one. It’s a clever mystery with a satisfying solution, and while the characters are not always hugely memorable they are generally likeable.

Next review: The Rubadub Mystery

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , | 2 Comments

The Mondays Keep Coming

So we’re speeding through April already, and we’re into the second week! Oh gosh!

This week Fiona will be bringing you the review of The Rilloby Fair Mystery, which I’m sure we’re all looking forward to.

I hope to have a better week this week, but I shall review the final Famous Five episode from the 90s – Five are Together Again for Friday. Hope that’s enough to whet your appetites!

Here are some pictures of spring flowers to help you get into that fresh mood for the week! Enjoy!

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 1 Comment

35 Things We Learned From the Famous Five a reblog from Forever Amber

Amber, of Forever Amber, has come up with a list of things we learn from the Famous Five, including:

1. All underground caves have a stream running through them. If you find yourself trapped in one (by smugglers, natch), all you have to do is follow the stream to the place where it breaks ground, and you will be freed.

2. You will almost always end up trapped in an underground cave during the “hols”, so you better have been paying attention to point 1.

3. Don’t worry, though – your faithful dog or other animal friend will guide you through the dark, winding tunnels to safety if the underground stream thing doesn’t work out.

Endpapers of Five Run Away Together, 1944 Hodder & Stoughton 1st Edition, by Eileen Soper. Oh for a torch like that!

There are another 32 things she has learned which can be read here.

And this all got me thinking. What else could we say we have learned from Blyton’s books in general?

  • Tutors are not to be trusted – they are either wrong doers or undercover policemen.
  • If a burglary has taken place locally you and your friends will be best placed to solve the crime. People chat to children and will tell them all sorts of incriminating things.
  • Midnight feasts WILL lead to stomach aches the next day.
  • If a locked room has been ransacked for papers, it was probably the work of a highly-trained chimp and you should look into nearby circuses or fairs.

Anything else?

Posted in Personal Experiences | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Child April – A poem by Enid Blyton

Today I’m bringing you a poem from Blyton’s Poetry Book.

I hope you like it.

Child April

Oh, April is a fairy child, a fairy child is she,
As wayward as the little winds a-blowing,
For will she smile or will she cry, for all the world to see,
There’s never, oh, there’s never any knowing!
So pelt her with apple-blossom, scatter her with daises,
Cool her feet with pearly drops of dew,
Call upon the little birds to sing her pretty praises,
And bid the sky bedeck itself in blue!

Oh, Cuckoo, are you coming now, for April wants to hear
Your pretty double-note among the trees?
You mustn’t disappoint her, or she’ll cry a little tear,
And send it silver-splashing on the breeze.
She’ll weep until a rainbow about the sky is glowing,
And then she’ll laugh and gaily dance away,
And by the springing bluebells you’ll know the way she’s going,
To see the cuckoo, singing loud and gay!

Its rather a good metaphor for spring and the weather we have in April isn’t it? What do you think of this April poem? I wish I could hear a cuckoo, I don’t think I’ve heard one before! I also wish the weather was a little kinder, but it does put me in mind of a toddler having a tantrum and not knowing what it wants!

I also quite enjoy the idea of April dancing through the land leaving bluebells in her wake. They are one of my favourite flowers by far. I do love bluebells. My gran used to tell me that if you picked one, a pixie would follow you home and cause havoc, so you mustn’t pick them. I never have; however now I suspect it had more to do with them being protected than any magical creature. I may be wrong, its not impossible!

Posted in Poetry | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

The Secret Series on TV : The Secret of Killimooin

I’m going to break this post down into two headings: Things that are like the book and Things that are not like the book. I highly suspect that the second one will produce many more points.


THINGS THAT ARE LIKE THE BOOK

The children fly to Baronia to stay with Prince Paul, and after visiting the castle they go off to the mountains.

There’s a statue in a cave, and the ear is used to open a secret tunnel.

There is a “secret” forest.

And that’s all I can think of.


THINGS THAT ARE NOT LIKE THE BOOK

Ruby goes along for the ride. Her main role appears to be falling for silly pranks (believing Paul that the Baronian tradition is to remove the king’s shoe, throw it over your shoulder and shout “the king’s feet go everywhere”) and getting lost in the mountains for a whole night. She does eventually reach the palace to summon help, though.

Charlotte and Thaddeus manage to get themselves tied up in the adventure yet again. Charlotte gets herself kidnapped by an old enemy and Thaddeus trails after them, both of them ending up in Baronia exactly where the children are.

The main plot is no longer about mysterious robbers who live in a forest no-one else has ever found a way into. Instead, it’s about an insane scientist who is trying to create a race of ‘living dead’ using spider venom. (He calls it poison all the way through but Ewan informs me spiders are venomous, not poisonous). So this crazy scientist has set up a network of underground tunnels and labs under the forest of Killimooin to carry out these important works. And naturally, when he and his henchmen discover Charlotte has seen them stealing a spider they kidnap her and bring her directly to their base of operations.

The main plot contains a huge amount of bad science. So bad I’m going to have a subheading.


Bad science

Venom (or poison) is drawn from a spider’s back using a large pipette. No needle or anything, just a pipette.

A henchman is bitten by a spider (as a punishment for trying to defect, of course) and has a near instantaneous collapse. He is then given the extracted venom from another spider orally and recovers within seconds, just as our crazy scientist predicted. The idea of using one venom as an antidote is ridiculous in its own right (here’s how anti-venoms are really made) and the idea that swallowing a mouthful of any anti-venom would cure you immediately is just as stupid.

Despite our henchman screaming in pain as soon as he’s bitten, and being affected right away, both Thaddeus and Mike take much longer to be affected. Mike feels dizzy soon after and spends the rest of the episode in bed (unaware he’s even been bitten), with Thaddeus races around rescuing Charlotte, passing out, losing Charlotte, rescuing her again, over and over it seems. He only collapses fully in the last ten minutes or so. Oh, and he’s saved when Charlotte gives him both the venom and anti-venom orally, not knowing which is which. (He doesn’t turn into the living-dead, incidentally.) Mike is cured by the housekeeper’s medicinal soup.

The scientist’s goal is to use the venom and the antidote together, somehow creating a race of people who are both living and dead at the same time. Literally, as he says, the living dead. Ewan believes this is where the  zombies in The Walking Dead may have come from, as he was watching that in the other room at the time.

Charlotte is to be his first test and is sealed in a pod that looks like it came from a bad sci-fi show. They don’t want to kill her, beyond her being the living dead I mean, so they pump ‘life-preserving gas’ into the pod.

There’s also talk of these living-dead people being “reactivated” with more anti-venom…

Laura and Peggy do their usual ‘scream as loud as you can’ performance right near the end, which causes each and every spider tank to shatter. I don’t know about you, but if I was going to keep deadly spiders I’d have them in some pretty sturdy tanks. Not the sort that would smash from an elbow bump or a human scream. Incidentally, it has been proven possible for an un-augmented human voice to smash glass, but only under certain circumstances. A professional singer who can sing at over 100 decibels (louder than a jack hammer), using the correct frequency and directing it at a fragile wine glass may shatter it. Two silly girls shrieking in a room full of spider tanks… not so much.

Their screams are also sufficient to have the crazy scientist and his henchmen all incapacitated and clutching their heads. The boys are perfectly fine, though.


And now back to the regularly scheduled criticisms:

There’s no mountain palace, no Yamen or Tooku. Instead we have an old wooden cabin and a housekeeper who looks like a stereotypical Scandinavian milkmaid. The children have to hike up to the cabin (no donkeys).

There’s also no Ranni or Pilescu. They are replaced by Barney Stokes, an ex secret service agent from the states. He acts as Paul’s bodyguard from the trip and it’s evident from early on that he’s up to something. He’s supposed to have called in the palace guard when Laura goes missing, but when they don’t turn up he says “it takes them some time to get organised.” We’re proven right later when he ties up Ruby. He then saves her after she rescues herself with the help of a rope-chewing goat, and admits he has been blackmailed into helping the crazy scientist keep people away from the mountains.

We should have known there was something not right just by his outfit: tartan trousers and a Butlin’s style blazer.

There’s no underground river fraught with danger, just miles of tunnels with one or two gates that need passwords to open.


I think we can conclude that this bears almost no resemblance to the original book. It’s less like the book than Spiggly Holes and Secret Island put together. I don’t know why they got rid of every single interesting element and replaced it all with crazy science and about an hour of people running about high-tech tunnels and woods full of CCTV cameras.

Our baddies aren’t even convincing. OK, scientist guy is absolutely NUTS. But his key henchman (I think his name was Block) is laughable. He looks like Gestapo officer Toht from Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark, but without an inch of menace (or a really cool travel coat-hanger). He’s clever enough to go to kidnap Charlotte and destroy any photos she has of him, yet stupid enough to take an open bag of secret documents with him. Naturally he leaves behind a document with an address on it which allows Thaddeus to find Charlotte. He also calls the scientist “master” and whimpers and cowers in his presence.

Most of the other henchmen look like soldiers, in full camo gear and balaclavas which they never take off, even inside the complex. They’re easily taken out by a) Thaddeus in a weakened spider-bite state and b) two girls screaming. The only two not in army garb are dressed like bikers (one even has a hideous curly mullet) and they can’t keep a woman in a sealed wooden crate long enough to transport her to Baronia without her escaping twice.

There are several other plot holes and illogical sequences but I think I’ve written enough to put you all off already.

The last thing I’ll mention is Laura (who is a queen of sulking in captivity) tells the scientist that she is Laura Arnold and she is from ENGLAND. In that snotty way that British people seem to always say, as in “I’m British – you can’t do anything to me.” Only problem is, she says it in the strongest New Zealand accent possible, and it’s fairly clear throughout that they have never set foot in England at any point.

To summarise: nothing like the book. No stars.

Posted in Blyton on Screen | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Comments

First Monday of April

Easter is now over, and I have no chocolate left. I will just have to hope that I don’t get trapped in any caves now, as I will have nothing for sustenance. Not that I tend to carry chocolate in my pocket, that is, so I’ve realistically got no hope. I also fail to carry a torch, rope, pencil, chalk or any other useful stuck-in-a-cave items. This is rather the topic of the post we’ve got for Sunday so I won’t say any more about it now. Yes – we have another week with a Sunday post!

Wednesday3

 

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 1 Comment