The Five Find-Outers covers through the years


Having previously looked at the Famous Five (parts one and two), The Adventure Series (parts one and two) St Clare’s (parts one and two), Malory Towers, (parts one and two) Mr Galliano’s Circus, The Secret Series, The Naughtiest Girl and the Barney Mysteries I thought it time I did the Five Find-Outers as well. I’m not sure why I missed such a major series before.


The first editions

The Five Find-Outers (or FFO as I will probably call them a lot, as it’s so much shorter!) is one of those series with multiple illustrators across their first editions. It had four different cover artists – Joseph Abbey (books 1-7), Jean Main (book 8), Treyer Evans (books 9-12, and also the internal illustrations for book 8), and then Lilian Buchanan (books 13-15).

To me it looks like Treyer Evans at least tried to mimic Joseph Abbey’s style, while Jean Main and Lilian Buchanan went very much in their own directions.

Joseph Abbey, 1945 / Joseph Abbey, 1949 / Jean Main, 1950 / Treyer Evans, 1951 / Treyer Evans, 1952 / Lilian Buchanan, 1957 / Lilian Buchanan, 1961.

While the first editions are in my opinion the best covers for the series, they are not amongst the best of all Blyton’s book covers. Jean Main’s cover struggles with perspective, while Joseph Abbey’s Goon is a strange looking creature indeed. Several other covers suffer from looking rather ‘muddy’ and indistinct too.


The confusing part of the 1960s and 1970s

Mary Gernat is a well-known Blyton cover illustrator, mostly linked with the Armada books of the 1960s, her covers includes titles from the St Clare’s, Malory Towers and Barney Mystery series. However she rarely did the covers for all books in a series; each Armada run had a mix of illustrators and The Five Find-Outers books are no different. Other illustrators who were published alongside her include Charles Stewart and Dorothy Brook.

Armada frequently published the first paperback editions of Blyton’s books; they did all 15 FFO books between 1963 and 1966. The illustrators were Dorothy Brook (book 1), Charles Stewart ( books 2-9), Peter Archer (books 10-11) and Mary Gernat (books 12-15).

Dorothy Brook, 1963 / Charles Stewart, 1963 / Charles Stewart, 1963 / Peter Archer, 1965  / Peter Archer, 1965 / Mary Gernat, 1965 / Mary Gernat 1965.

So different artists, different colour schemes, similar but not identical art style and different fonts, yet they all scream Armada to me! It’s probably the solid-coloured backgrounds that does it?

Then it all gets a wee bit confusing, as Dragon and Methuen did alternating runs, some only doing parts of the series, some with artwork repeated…

After staring at lists of publishers, dates, artists as well as the covers themselves, I think I’ve more or less sorted it all out. I have grouped these covers into “sets” based on the design (rather than artist or year…) In reality it may be that publishers switched design and consider their sets different from mine, but I’ve got to organise it somehow.

So, the second ‘set’ are from Dragon, who reprinted the whole series between 1966 and 1969. These were the instantly recognisable upside-down polaroid covers (as I call them).

Peter Archer provided the covers for the first eight books, and Mary Gernat the rest.

Peter Archer, 1966 / Peter Archer, 1967 / Mary Gernet, 1969 / Mary Gernet, 1969.

Methuen then did a set of books 1-8, 11, 12 and 14, using the full versions of the previous dragon covers with text straight on the background.

Peter Archer, 1972 / Peter Archer, 1970 / Peter Archer, 1970 / Mary Gernat, 1970.

Most of these have a solid background colour which echoes the earlier Armadas, but for covers like Disappearing Cat, it makes a bit of a strange scene. That’s not a missing cat, that’s a huge disembodied cat head floating above a strange alien landscape…

Then we have a 1973 set of Dragons, with covers by Paul Wright – another upside-down Polaroid design but with only covers for books 2, 3, 4, 7 and 8.

Paul Wright, 1973 / Paul Wright, 1973 / Paul Wright, 1972 / Paul Wright, 1972.

These are quite skilful, especially Strange Bundle, though the window being off-centre on Pantomime Cat bothers me a little!

And last in this confusing lot are four covers by Methuen, some dated 1970 and others 1973. These have a bright block of colour at the top and use previous artwork by Paul Wright and Mary Gernat – Wright’s for books 9 10 come from the Dragon polaroids, while Gernat’s are for books 13 and 15 and are from the earlier Methuen polaroids.

Paul Wright, 1973 / Paul Wright, 1973 / Mary Gernat, 1970 / Mary Gernat, 1973.

The illustrations are fine on these, but the coloured banners look a bit cheap and garish – they don’t compliment the other colours on the cover at all!


The straight-forward 1970s, 80s and 90s.

You’ll be glad to know that the next thirty years had nice, straight-forward sets where the whole series was printed with one artists and one design!

First up, another Methuen lot, this time from 1979. These covers are by Reginald Grey and I always associate them with Malory Towers as that’s where I saw the ‘arched label’ design first.

All Reginald Grey, 1979

What’s interesting about these as although they have a solid colour background like other covers they manage to look as if the foreground has been cut out and stuck down on top like scraps. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, though.

Then we have two sets by Dragon. The first are dated 1983, and have covers by Bruno Elettori – the third and final set of upside-down polaroids (the most of these I’ve seen for any one series!)

All Bruno Elettori, 1983

These are probably the least attractive of the polaroid covers, being quite dull-coloured.

The second Dragons are from 1987, artwork by Mick Austin. These use the notion that mysteries are denoted by question marks and so have bordered the title with lots of little question marks.

These are fairly uninspiring, if I’m honest. From these only Strange Bundle really gives an insight into the plot of the story, the others could be from any story more or less.

Into the 90s we start with Dean, in 1990 with Liz Roberts covers.

All Liz Roberts, 1990

You might think I’d class these as upside-down polaroids, but no, they’re not white so they don’t give me that vibe. They do give me a very 90s vibe, however, particularly Banshee Towers! I do associate these covers with Blyton as I’ve seen other series/titles in this style, and the artwork is actually inoffensive – the children look like actual humans, the colours are fairy nice and they’re just nice drawings (even if the clothes are awful) in general.

The FFOs must have been popular as Armada released another set in 1991 (these I think were paperbacks, while the Deans were hardbacks, different publishers could hold the license to publish the books at the same time if they were in different formats), with artwork by an uncredited artist (the only one for the series). These are also the only photo-covers, and I find them really odd. The only TV adaptation of this series is the Japanese Gonin to Ippiki (Five Children and Dog) from 1969-1971 – and that is definitely not what is on these covers).

All uncredited, 1991

So, if it’s not from a TV series then these are just some random 90s children that we’ve never met, who are hanging around in fields or riding bikes or writing letters and not doing anything we might recognise as a scene from the books. What a great marketing strategy!

Mammoth used Button Design co (a name that’s popped up for several 90s editions on other series already) for their 1996 paperback covers, and Dean then used the same artwork for their 1997 hardbacks. Mammoth and Dean are both owned by Egmont, which helps explain this.

 

Button Design co 1996 / 1997.

As you can see the Deans have stretched the image from a square to fill the whole cover, resulting in a lot of cropping. Some books appear to have Four Find-Outers, or sometimes Four-and-a-bit.


The almost entirely straight-forward 2000s to present day

There is only one set from 2000 on which doesn’t do all 15 books, and those are the second Dean set in a line up that goes Egmont, Dean, Egmont, Dean, Egmont.

So, the first Egmonts are from 2003, with Jason Ford covers.

All Jason Ford, 2003.

I actually don’t hate these. They don’t suit the FFOs at all, but if they were for another author I’d not mind them. They at least make a good attempt to convey some elements of the story – Fatty’s walk in the night when he speaks to the night watchman, Fatty out at night again (a little vaguer but at least he’s not just lounging around), the Lorenzos and their dog Poppet, Eunice having a pop at Fatty.

Then in 2004 Dean used the same Button Design Co. art as previously.

All Button Design co, 2004.

These look pretty cheap and nasty but at least they haven’t cropped 1/5th of the gang out.

In 2009/10 Egmont had covers by Martin Usborne and Shutterstock. I’m not sure what part Shutterstock are responsible for – they are generally stock photos, so it’s probably the magnifying glass.

Martin Usborne and Shutterstock, 2010 / Martin Usborne and Shutterstock, 2010 / Martin Usborne and Shutterstock, 2009 /Martin Usborne and Shutterstock, 2009.

Again, I don’t hate these. They’re not what I’d pick for Blyton but a lot of thought has actually gone into them. The scene in the magnifying glass is at least related to the story and shoe the children actually doing something, and then the motif in the background is cleverly related to the story too (well, one or two books they obviously struggled with which is a shame, but the rest are clever). Smoke to signify the fire in Burnt Cottage, paw prints for the missing cat in Disappearing Cat, post marks for Strange Messages, painting frames for Banshee Towers, and so on. They’re the kind of detail you might not pay much attention to until you’ve read the book, then you realise their significance.

And then we have our partial Dean set in 2009, with books 1-6 having new Mary Gernat covers.

All Mary Gernat, 2009.

Initially when I saw these I wondered how these could be Mary Gernat. Looking closer, however, I can just about see her style under the dark, heavy lines. I’m not sure if her original work has been digitally edited, or if she was trying a new style… anyway, these were published more than ten years after her death, so they could have been done during the heyday of her career in the 1960s, but not used for whatever reason.

The last Egmonts are from 2014 with Timothy Bank covers. The artwork by Timothy Banks was then reused by Hodder in both 2016 and 2019. Hodder and Egmont are separate publishers, so this time I’m not sure how to explain it.

All Timothy Banks, 2014 / 2016 / 2019.

I don’t know if these particularly suit Blyton or the FFO, but I like the overall design. It’s a pity that the children have silly cartoonish features though.


Do you see any of your favourites amongst these? Or any that make you want to claw your eyes out?

This entry was posted in Illustrations and artwork and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The Five Find-Outers covers through the years

  1. Dale Vincero, Brisbane Australia says:

    I have only recently started on the Finder Outer series. Must say I found the stories to be very wordy. Any page is just mostly conversation. Not that much description of what people are doing. And some of the stories are a bit thin and lacking in content. I have enjoyed them though. Have now read all of them.

    Like

    • Fiona says:

      They are quite different from the Famous Five and Adventure Series. I think they are amongst her oldest works in terms of who they are aimed at. They’re a more complex version of the Secret Seven, I think, and yes, definitely bulked out with quite a bit of talk instead of action.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. There seems to be a watershed round about 1980: up until then, the cover illustrations tend to depict a scene from the story, and often attempt to depict a key scene, not just any old scene-at-random.

    After 1980, the illustrations become generic: 5 kids and a dog, with no attempt to show any element of the story. Moreover, they also become offensively ‘modern’, in that they start a trend of pretending that the books are not set in the 1940s or 1950s — a trend which has run to puffed-jackets, blue jeans, and vividly 1990s colours on some covers.

    I have a pet hate: photo-realistic covers. Of all the post-1980s covers, for me these are the worst, as the photo realism inevitably involves the artist in stepping out into a modern street to take his inspiration from current fashions in kids clothes. A photo cover which showed the 1950s would be not too bad, but a cover photo of the 1990s or 2010s is silly. It must lead the reader to expect that other modern elements will appear in the story, but which obviously are not present.

    The cartoon covers are especially offputting, in as much as they suggest that Enid Blyton’s work has no value unless we pretend it’s a Harry Potter book! Egmont is a comics publisher, so the use of a cartoon style is understandable, but the flagrantly Harry Potter style is absurd: the Fine Doubters do not use magic!

    When the covers began to deceive the buyer into expecting something which the story does not contain, they started to be unacceptable. But to imply that Blyton’s characters solve their mysteries by supernatural means, in the J K Rowling style, is a new low. Enid Blyton is not JK Rowling; she is not even CS Lewis. Covers which imply that the Find Outer stories are about Witches, magic Wardrobe’s, or the Philosopher’s Stone are beneath contempt.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Fiona says:

      That’s a good summary. I had a mix of Blyton editions as a kid, some 40s/50s ones with dustjackets and some garish 90s paperbacks, so I was never confused by the content but I too wonder if kids today pick them up expecting them to be set recently and are confused by the time period. Obviously some updates are made to cars/currency/clothing but not enough to bring the stories anywhere near the past few decades.

      A lot of the cartoony covers definitely make me feel like the books are supposed to be whimsical magical adventures, but perhaps children now are so used to that style it doesn’t bias them to the contents?

      Liked by 1 person

      • I’m glad that we can enjoy a nice ebook, in the sense that we can edit it slightly to include whatever cover image we actually want to see. I’ve added my favourite Armada covers to all my .epub versions of the Find Outer books.

        Am I really surprised that publishers will use whatever style of cover they think will help the books sell? No, of course I’m not: this is what they’ve always done. Nowadays their choices are absurd, from the point of view that these stories are set in the Fifties, but if it introduces children to Enid Blyton it probably shouldn’t be begrudged.The text changes genuinely annoy me; the cover changes are just something to be shrugged off.

        It’s nice that you like the older covers. But as you’ve now said you grew up with them, I detect a pattern: you like the Fifties covers which you remember from childhood; I like the Armada covers which I remember from childhood.

        Artistically, the Egmont cartoon-style covers have nothing objectionable about them. The Harry Potter books look nice enough, and these Blyton cartoons are in the same style. I just find it odd that the Hidden House in “Mystery Hidden House” looks like an image from a 1950s E.C. horror comic in the style of Steve Ditko, because of its wavering outline; and the overwhelming feeling it gives me is that maybe the publishers will soon be tempted to re-title this one “The Mystery of the _Haunted_ House”!

        The other Find Outer cartoon covers look weird: the spiky haircut of one of the kids reminded me irresistibly of Ron Weasley. I hope you don’t throw me off the blog, if I admit to having read some of the Harry Potter tales! There is, admittedly, some hints on some covers about the story inside: but f I was a kid and I opened one, I think I’d still half expect someone on a broomstick to come flying out — not necessarily Angela Lansbury!

        Liked by 1 person

        • Fiona says:

          I had a real mix of covers – Hardbacks, Armadas from the 60s, various 70s and 80s covers as well as 90s ones. I always preferred the originals but I don’t mind many of the 60s and 70s ones.

          If I threw you off the blog for reading Harry Potter I’d have to throw myself off too – I’ve read them all several times!

          Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s