Monday afternoon is still Monday

Oops. So I forgot about the Monday post, again. This is becoming a habit. At least this one didn’t become a Tuesday post though.

This week we’ll be putting up the latest chapter of Poppy’s Adventure series fic – The Marsh of Adventure and I intend to watch Five Go Mad on Mescalin and then write about what I thought of it. Stef isn’t sure what she’s going to do, either another review or she might bake something and put up the recipe.

I can’t say we’ve got any news on the blog this week, because we don’t!

I’ve taken a lot of photos in the past week or so, so I’ll try and just put up a small selection to show you where I’ve been and the sort of things I’ve seen.

 

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 2 Comments

The O’Sullivan Twins

The 2000 edition

The 2000 edition

This week I finished the second St Clare’s book, no mean feat when I have been staying with Fiona and we have had such a busy week. However, we were on the beach on Tuesday and I managed to get some reading done in the sun (and mist), so here I am, reviewing it.

The O’Sullivan Twins starts with the twins being much less whiny than they were in the beginning of the first book. Almost straight away we get introduced to their cousin Alison, who had been with them at Redroofs. Alison is the same sort of vain, silly girl as the twins had been one term earlier. After this big, long introduction to Alison she really pays very little part in the story.

Now we start with the journey to St Clare’s and meet some of the regular chums, Tessie, who invites them to a midnight feast, Janet, and some others. We also get to see more of  Mamzelle who is probably the main teacher in this book. She plays some key parts in the story as well.

There are two new girls in the form, Lucy and Margery, and rather like Belinda and Ellen in the Second Form at Malory Towers, the two new girls are liked and hated.

Margery is sullen, and closed in, but shows a talent at being good at games, hockey especially and is picked for the team at St Clare’s. However before the match, Margery gets wound up and explodes at the girls’ history teacher, which causes the whole class to send her to Coventry and when she shoots the winning goal in the hockey match, no one cheers. It really is most odd. You don’t find out why Margery is the surly until half-term but no one seems sympathetic to her position and she gets blamed unjustly for things that begin to happen to the twins later in the book.

In many ways the book is unjustly named after the O’Sullivan twins as they take quite a back seat in the plot of this book. Pat and Isabelle do join in the midnight feast, but they do not play in the hockey match, or plan any tricks with anyone, and for some quite large chunks of the book, they do not appear at all.

However when they do appear, Pat becomes the dominant twin; she is the one people think of first, she is the one who becomes the target of a hate campaign, and Pat is the one who seems to take control of the situations the twins find themselves in.

If I’m honest, I felt that there wasn’t really a lot happening in this book, and when things were happening, it seemed forced and all too familiar (I read the Malory Towers books first and it seems to me that a lot of plot points in St Clare’s were reworked into better plots for Malory Towers). The characters are almost the same as well. In this book, Erica reminds me of Gwendoline Lacey who cannot see her own wrong doings. Lucy reminds me of Belinda, as I’ve already pointed out and Margery as Ellen.

The only thing that really feels different in this book from anything in the Malory Towers books is that towards the end of the book, there is a fire at St Clare’s in the hospital section. Its hard to explain it all without giving it away, but lets just say everything sorts itself out.

Now I think I might have to end here, because I really don’t want to say too much and give it all away by explaining everything. Personally, I’m not a huge fan of this book, the twins that give it the title hardly feature. I think it would have been better to have called the series something like “The Girls of St Clare’s” because then it doesn’t matter so much if things don’t always happen to the twins.

I may read the book again, and see if I enjoyed it more than the first time, but it might not be for some time yet. However if you’re a fan, or have read it and think differently to me, leave a comment below and tell me why!

I look forward to hearing from you!

 

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , | 3 Comments

The Secret Island – How has Blyton’s original text fared in a modern edition? part 2

Right, so on to chapters three to five of The Secret Island. The previous chapters can be seen here. The original text I’m using is from the sixth impression from October 1949 and the updated text is from an Award paperback from 2009.


CHAPTER THREE: THE ESCAPE

In this chapter, again, references to violence are removed. I’m finding the alterations a little different to what we’ve seen in the other titles I’ve looked at. In the Famous Five it was almost always a case of a word or two being removed or changed for something else, and the same in Malory Towers except for in one or two cases where a line had to be altered more substantially to make sense. This book has already had at least one line completely re-written when it didn’t need to be.

Even Nora took a slapping without tears is the first line to be changed in this chapter. It could easily have followed the pattern set by the other books mentioned, and become something like Even Nora took a scolding without tears. Instead, we get a re-write to Even Nora didn’t burst into tears when she was shouted at. I can’t think why they needed to reorder the sentence like that.

Then we have they’ll be well slapped being changed to they’ll get into big trouble. (That could easily have become well scolded if they were trying to preserve as much original text as possible.

The phrase whip us well isn’t changed as much as it just becomes punish us well.

I only spotted two other small changes, where queerest becomes strangest and lake-water becomes lake water (though sleeping-place keeps its hyphen along with a few other phrases).

Like in the past two chapters the paperback includes one illustration – a full page one while the hardback has three taking up either half or one-third of a page each.

Wynne hasn’t done his own version of Davie’s work this time, he has drawn them in their boat heading to the island while Davie illustrated Nora taking items from the larder, the children carrying their things to the boat and Peggy filling the kettle on the island.

Again Wynne’s seem heavy handed and thick-lined – Peggy seems to have a moustache almost and Nora has war paint on her cheeks it seems.

IMG_1756

You can click  on this to see it (and the girls’ faces) larger


CHAPTER FOUR: THE FIRST NIGHT ON THE ISLAND

For the first time ever I’ve found a chapter with no new changes. All there is here is a few hyphens removed from to-day and to-morrow.

There are three partial page illustrations again in the hardback compared to one in the paperback, and again none of them show the same scene. It’s interesting to see a picture of the willow root larder though, by Wynne, but it doesn’t really match my childhood imagination of it which has stuck. The children seem oddly modern yet old fashioned in his pictures. Their clothes (particularly the boys’ striped trousers) aren’t far off what Davie drew but their hair (particularly Peggy’s) is much more modern.


CHAPTER FIVE: THE BUILDING OF THE HOUSE

I was getting a little worried, I admit. Seeing as the last chapter had no changes I was concerned that now the children were away from the slappings there would be nothing to write about. How wrong I was! The crusade in this chapter is all about gender equality. Never mind that up until now the girls have done the cooking, sewing, ironing etc while the boys have been farm-hands – now’s the time for them all to be equals, except then they’re perhaps not quite.

Jack’s the captain of the group so it’s all his speeches that get altered. First he says Now Peggy, wash up and Nora, too. This becomes Now let’s all wash up. 

Likewise Hurry up and get the supper, girls becomes Let’s hurry up and get the supper. 

Also, You two girls  clear up as usual, and Mike and I will get back to the house is changed to We’ve got to clear up as usual and then we must get back to the house. This little change has a big knock-on effect for the next few paragraphs.

Originally they read (with other text in between of course) Nora and Peggy washed up in the lake… Then they ran off to join the boys in the willow thicket… Jack had been busy. He had chopped down some willow saplings… and had cut off the long branches. 

But because in the update the boys stay to help with the dishes it all becomes They washed up in the lake… Then they all ran off to the willow thicket… Jack made himself busy. He chopped down some willow saplings… and cut off the long branches.

And finally, gender wise, Jack originally says of skinning rabbits: It’s a man’s job, that, so you two girls can leave it to Mike and me. This becomes if it makes you squeamish, you two girls can leave it to Mike and me. To be honest, I don’t think that’s much less sexist as he’s now assuming Nora is squeamish (and Peggy too) simply because Nora says she doesn’t want him to catch rabbits as she likes them. Perhaps it would have been better changed to if you’d rather, you can leave it to me. That way it doesn’t imply Mike is up for skinning rabbits while the girls aren’t.

I don’t have a problem with the original, I’ll just say that now, as I respect that Jack represents a child of the 1930s who had a different upbringing and different attitudes to what we have now. It’s especially not any less sexist when you consider the next line  – So long as you can cook the rabbits for dinner that’s all you need worry about, is left intact.

That’s one of my bigger problems with the updates – so many things are changed but it’s so pointless as they leave an equal number of things that seem just as outdated/sexist/violent and what have you.

Anyway, before I get too involved in my rant. A few more hyphens are lost from willow-trees and willow-boughs which both become separate words, and a small discrepancy is corrected. The original text has grandad in earlier chapters and then granddad in this one. The paperback sticks with grandad in each instance.

There are four illustrations in the hardback this time, and still just one in the paperback though this time it’s of the same scene, the building of the willow house.

Very similar, I think.


 

I make that eleven changes to the text (I’m not adding on each time a hyphen is removed.) Add that to the sixteen from chapters one and two and we get twenty seven in total.

Posted in Updating Blyton's Books | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Secret Seven books at McDonald’s by Su, part 3

Adventure on the Way Home

This story comes from Enid Blyton’s Magazine Annual No. 2 first published 1955. Again there have been a few little interchanges on words such as lighted becomes lit, cautiously becomes carefully (happening twice in the text), scared becomes nervous and awful faces is changed to cross faces.  One change that I do not understand is that in the 1955 edition when Scamper hears a noise he is described as having his tail down, but this has been changed to tail up.  When a dog hears something and tenses up, maybe starts to growl, what position is his tail in?

In both editions Colin brings some rope along and Jack climbs up to a window.  This has been chosen as a scene by both illustrators to show in the book and gives a good comparison between 1955 and 2014.

There are also some instances of what may be considered old-fashioned words being left in the book. Thanks awfully for a jolly nice time, Colin remains untouched as does all subsequent uses of the word jolly. Chuck it up stays in the new text as does the description of the policeman walking; policeman had rubber soled shoes and went quietly.  In a lot of Enid Blyton books if you wish to remain unheard you have to wear rubber soled shoes, does this mean that this phrase has been kept in other modern editions and the editors are confident that the young children of today are used to it?

One major change through the book is the reference to violence.  At first the children are alerted to danger when they hear a scream but his has been changed to a noise.  When they hear this they have a little cold shiver of fright which has been changed to cold shiver.  When they eventually see through the window it is described as hand up, he was going to hit someone. Oh there’s another scream. Peter what… This is now hand up. Peter what… Also a most bloodcurdling howl becomes a really loud noise.

When this becomes too much and Peter decides to go to the police, it has been changed on three occasions to go for help but the phrase fetching the police has remained in the new one. Not particularly consistent but then Peter does come back with two policemen so maybe they felt they had to leave one mention of the police in the text  to try to make the story flow.

When we see the “baddies” they’ve got knives has been cut as has the phrase Where’s my knife, Peter saw that he had a knife in his hands, and just you put that knife down. When the girl is explaining what is going on though she states I have to scream like anything! This has not been cut from the new book yet there has been no mention previously of any screams being heard, just a lot of loud noises.

Also in the book the policeman chastises the Seven a little and suggests that if they get into any more adventures their parents would be after them with a cane.  Needless to say this has been cut.  Peter’s father also calls them little idiots when he has heard what they have been getting up to and guess what, yes, it is not a good thing to call your children idiots, even in jest.

There is another minor change in the story where it states he said in the text but it has been changed to Jack said.  It does seem obvious that it is Jack speaking but as the new sentence containing Jack said is at the start of a new chapter, it is probably better that the speaker’s name is mentioned.  A child may have finished the chapter and only be continuing with the story a day later.  In the original story none of the story is split into chapters so this change makes sense in the context of the new editions.

aotwh

Next post: Secret Seven books at Mcdonald’s part 4

Posted in Book reviews, Updating Blyton's Books | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Back to Work Monday

As you well know, I was visiting Fiona up in Dundee this week, and we had a very nice, sunny, busy time. So apart from failing to blog yesterday, because the train was late, we’ve been pretty good in blogging. We’ve been walking, exploring waterfalls, going to the zoo and wandering around St Andrews.

Anyway this week, we have the next part of the McDonald’s Secret Seven books from Su, and Fiona will be marking the changes to The Secret Island.  And hopefully I shall get around to reviewing The O’Sullivan Twins.

Well with all that out of the way, only the blog news and pictures to go. This week, we have managed to hit 70,000 views on the blog. Its a wonderful achievement, and our blog goes from strength to strength. Can’t wait until we get 100,000 views.

So, just to leave off, here are some of my instagram pictures from this week to tide you over until I’ve edited my proper pictures.

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

A Beckenham day out

Stef had a three hour delay on the train heading home yesterday so she wasn’t able to finish her St Clare’s review. So while checking to see what we had in the drafts I stumbled across this. The day out was over a year ago now and neither of us managed to find a format or layout that really seemed good enough for writing about it. I figure, though, it’s better to publish it as it is than to let it languish for the rest of eternity. So, a year late, here’s what Stef had to say about the Beckenham day out (with some editing and additions from me) – Fiona.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

About a month ago, on the 15th June 2013, some members of the Enid Blyton Society decided to take a trip to Beckenham where Enid Blyton spent her childhood, moving from house to house.

With great thanks to Cliff Watkins, our tour guide and Tony Summerfield of the Enid Blyton Society, for organising the day it was most enjoyable. We have copied the schedule for the day onto our blog and added a picture to show you which house is which.

You will be able to match the numbers on the schedule to the pictures below so you can put the names to the houses.

  1. Meet outside Clock House Station: cross Beckenham Road by pedestrian lights, turn left.
  2. Turn right into Chaffinch Road.
  3.  Arrive at 95 Chaffinch Road, Enid Blyton’s first Beckenham Home from 1897 to 1903.
  4.  Return along Chaffinch Road, until path and steps to Beckenham Road bridge over railway. Cross pedestrian lights, meet late arrivals at the station; turn left and then right into Clock House Road.
  5. Keep on pavement veering to right to reach Malory Close.
  6. Return to Clock House Road which turns right; reach 35 and 31 Clock House Road.
  7. Cross over the road and turn left, and then right into Cedars Road to Tresco.
  8. Continue along Cedars Road to see the Chaffinch Brook then continue to Queens Road; cross over, continue along Cedars Road to reach Elm Road. Turn left to reach 14 Elm Road.
  9. Continue to the Baptist Church
  10. Cross over Hayne Road and turn left into Westfield Road with no 13 on right. Continue to the end of road and turn left in Croydon Road to reach the War Memorial roundabout with (left to right), Beckenham Road, Rectory Road, the Cinema and Beckenham High Street. Pause to note the 227 bus stop on the opposite side of Beckenham High Street.
    Lunch Break!
  11. Meet at the bus stop to take 227 bus to Oakhill and start of Oakwood Avenue. Alight bus, cross Westgate Road and continue 30 yards to use pedestrian crossing to the other side of Bromley Road. After 50 yards, cross Crescent Road. Turn left into Oakwood Avenue and proceed up the hill, passing on the opposite of the road the entrances to Perth Road and Overbury Road.
  12. Reach the entrance to White Oak Drive, which is opposite 34 Oakwood Avenue
  13. Proceed to the top of Oakwood Avenue which is the summit of what used to be called Clay Hill. Carry on to reach the T junction of Scott’s Lane. Turn right and cross over Scott’s lane to pass Stanley Avenue and Ferguson Close to reach a busy interchange of five roads.  Turn left into Shortlands Road, pass the Library and Enid’s last Beckenham home –  83 Shortlands Road – is opposite.

 

Posted in Enid Blyton, Personal Experiences | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

My seventh Noddy book: Do Look Out Noddy!

My seventh Noddy book is Do Look Out Noddy!, number fifteen in the series. I should have reviewed this last time but I accidentally took the wrong one away on holiday with me a few weeks ago. This is the last one I have actually, so I will have to start looking for some more so I can carry on reviewing them.

Dust jacket by Robert Lee and Robert Tyndall

Cover by Robert Lee and Robert Tyndall

Like most of my other Noddy books I got this in Alton, and as it’s very tatty it only cost me a pound.

This title was illustrated by Robert Lee and Robert Tyndall.


THE STORY

The story starts with Noddy being very cheerful as he has been taking lots of people to the station and earning himself lots of sixpences. However, as the milkman points out to him, all these people are staying by the seaside or elsewhere or holiday and there will be no-one left to hire his little car.

Noddy’s great idea is to go off to the sea-side himself, with Big-Ears, but his friend thinks it would be silly to spend his money on a holiday when he won’t be able to earn any more. They even have a little argument about it and Big-Ears slams his toadstool house’s door on Noddy!

IMG_1741

Noddy heads off to his next job then, after slamming his car door of course, and takes Sally Skittle  and three of her little skittles to the train station for their holiday. They’re in quite the rush so he has a few near run-ins with Mr Plod along the way, and then when they do get to the station Sally Skittle says she’ll pay him on the return leg of her journey.

520high+1316641

Toy Town is alarmingly empty on his way back home, and worse, when he gets there he finds a note from the policeman demanding he go to the station to see him. (A scary prospect, rather like when your teacher used to write SEE ME at the bottom of your work.)

Noddy decides not to go but the note makes him too anxious to even eat his lunch so he decides to head over to see Big-Ears and tell him about it. On his way he sees a well-dressed monkey who hails his car. He introduces himself as Mr Marvel Monkey and tells Noddy he is a salesman but his bicycle is in for repairs. He asks Noddy to drive him around in the mean-time.

IMG_1742

Noddy wants to run this by Big-Ears who, as it turns out, isn’t altogether impressed with Mr Marvel(lous) Monkey. Mr Monkey sides with Noddy about not going to see Mr Plod despite the more sensible Big-Ears saying he should go. I think Noddy might get himself into a lot of trouble as this monkey seems likely to lead him rather astray.

They head to Rocking Horse town to sell some horse tails, but all the horses there have fine tails and say ‘nay’ to him, which Noddy translates as no. They camp overnight as Mr Monkey says they will try again in the morning. He also tells Noddy (who has to sleep in his car) to just look out and see his tail poking out of his tent if he gets lonely in the night.

Come morning the Rocking Horses come to them to buy tails as they’ve lost theirs. I think I can see where this is going (I wonder how long it will take Noddy to catch on?). Noddy points out they have been cut off, and Mr Monkey remarks it was awfully lucky they were there with new tails to sell that day. Yes, very lucky indeed!

IMG_1743

Next they are off to Clockwork Clown Village, where all the clowns already have keys to wind themselves up and don’t want to buy new ones. Again they camp out and in the morning lots of the clowns come to them in need of new keys as ones belonging to their friends or family were stolen in the night. Mr Monkey sells them new ones at two shillings each as they must have new keys or their clown friends can’t be wound up again.

IMG_1744

At this point, Alice might say curiouser and curiouser but Noddy doesn’t seem to have noticed anything odd yet.

The next thing to sell is whiskers so they head off to Toy-Dog Town. There, none of the dogs want new whiskers apart from one little puppy Noddy stumbled across who has had theirs bitten off by another little dog. Noddy goes to fetch some of their whiskers from sale but instead stumbles across old cut off rocking horse tails and a pair of scissors as well as a monkey’s tail.

He confronts Mr Monkey about it and in his anger ties him up with his phony old tail and drags him to his car to take him to Mr Plod.

IMG_1746

Everything is rounded up very neatly in the end as Mr Plod had only wanted to see Noddy to warn him about Mr Monkey in the first place! Plus Noddy gets a reward for handing him in so that he and Big-Ears can go on a bit of a holiday after all!


It was good to see Noddy be so bold and brave in this story, even if he was rather slow on the uptake about what Mr Monkey was up to. Had he not found all the evidence in the bag I doubt he would have made the leap of logic himself.

IMG_1745

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Rosewood Mystery by Cathy, chapter 9

ANOTHER STRANGE THING

Roger and Snubby were both most put-out in the morning when they heard about the night’s happenings.

“Another adventure without us!” Snubby sulked.

“Well we couldn’t wake you – we were trying to be quiet and not alert any burglars,” Diana said. “It would have made too much noise, creeping along and waking you, and Loony would have been bound to make a row.”

The four children were sat in the sitting room together after breakfast. The sun was shining brightly again and the day was already hot, with no trace of the storm, but everything in the garden was too wet to sit on, so they had decided to sit indoors. They couldn’t decide whether to tell Miss Pepper about the noises.

“I don’t think there’s any point,” Roger said. “If you think it was the door of the garden shed, why say anything?”

“I just can’t help feeling there’s something mighty strange about it,” said Barney solemnly.

Diana stared at him in surprise. “But – last night – you thought it was the door of the shed!” she exclaimed.

“Yes, I know,” Barney said. “I just can’t help wondering why Miranda was so frightened, whimpering like she was. It’s as if she knew there was someone down here.”

“But how could there be?” Snubby said. “All the doors and windows were locked – you checked them!”

“And like Diana said, the keys were all in the doors, so no-one could put a key in outside.” Roger added.

“I know, I know.” Barney still looked puzzled. “It’s impossible really, when you think about it.”

Miss Pepper came in with a duster.

“Come on now – shoo!” she smiled. “This room needs a thorough clean and dust!”

“Let me help you,” Diana said, and ran to fetch another duster. The three boys wandered out into the garden to see if the hot sun had dried the table and chairs so they could sit down. They were almost dry, so Barney fetched a cloth from the shed and wiped the rest of the raindrops off, and they sat down. Miranda began to chase Loony round the lawn.

Barney got up after a few minutes and went over to the shed. The door was still ajar. He pushed it sharply and it banged against the frame. It certainly would have sounded like a loud bump in the stillness of the night. But something else bothered him now. He and Diana had been sat right next to Diana’s window when he had heard the bump. And it had certainly not sounded as if it was in the garden. It had sounded further away. If it had been the door of the shed, they would both have heard it a lot more clearly because Diana’s window overlooked the garden. Barney felt uncomfortable. He wandered back to Snubby and Roger and told them what he thought.

In the sitting room, Diana and Miss Pepper were busy dusting. Diana was doing one side, and Miss Pepper the other. Suddenly she gave an exclamation.

“Well I never!”

Diana turned at once.

“What is it, Miss Pepper?” she asked.

Miss Pepper was standing looking at a small brown oak table that stood next to one of the armchairs near the fireplace.

“The silver!” Miss Pepper said. “There were two silver candlesticks and a goblet on this table – they’ve gone!”

Continue reading →

Posted in Fan fiction | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Monday

We’ll hopefully be heading for the beach by the time you’re reading this (assuming the weather sticks to the forecast).

The latest chapter of Cathy’s Barney Mystery fic will go up on Wednesday, then I plan to review another Noddy book on Friday. Stef is aiming to finish reading the second St Clare’s book this week too, so she can review it for Sunday.

A very short post this week, I know, but I’ll end on a few of my latest photos as usual.

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Famous Five Diary

So I’ve just travelled up to Scotland to stay with Fiona for a week, so I’m writing this blog on the train to pass the time (it’s either that or you get something cobbled together at half ten this evening, when I’m not even sure I shall be able to string a sentence together!)

My blog for this week will be looking at The Famous Five Diary by Mary Danby. It was published by Knight books in 1988. The tag line at the top of the book claims “Have the most Adventurous Year Ever…” which is an interesting title.

the-famous-five-diary

I got my copy from a small second hand bookshop in Alton, Hampshire, for two pounds, so it wasn’t a bad buy. Its not something I had ever thought of owning. In fact I had thought that they were incredibly rare. Now I’m not so sure. There are a few copies on eBay, but not many, so maybe I picked up quite a gem.

It’s a funny little book really, not like a proper diary. There are little boxes for you to write in, randomly spaced on the page, but the gaps are filled in with little notes about nature, jokes and contributions, apparently from the famous five.

The feel of the jokes that the book contains are what you might class as ‘bad’. January for example has “what is the coldest form of transport?”A b-b-b-b-b-bicycle!”, so its that kind of bad. There aren’t too many jokes mind, so that’s a relief. I can’t imagine the Famous Five telling jokes that are quite so awful (but there is no accounting for Dick’s sense of humour after all!)

Danby includes little puzzles as well as the jokes. From what I’ve read they don’t seem very Blytonesque. Danby doesn’t seem to be very good at mimicking the style of Blyton. It may of course be the format doesn’t allow for much fluidity to get into the style, but any good writer who is taking on such well known works, should be able to work with whatever the format is.

A sample of pages, taken from a lovely blog over at vintagecobweb.com

A sample of pages, taken from a lovely blog over at Vintagecobweb’s website.

You may have heard the name Mary Danby before, and you would be correct in thinking that she has a Blyton connection. Danby is the author who wrote the “Famous Five and Me” books, where you got parts of a Blyton story, such as Adventuring Again, and then added different ‘paths’ into the stories and you have go pick the right way to go to find out the story. I only remember coming across these when I was about twelve or thirteen so I have only a hazy memory of them, but I can remember not being impressed (Which is odd because I did like one of the Claude Voilier books, The Famous Five and the Black Mask). So imagine my surprise when I realised that Danby had written other Blyton related things.

To give you an example of something that doesn’t feel very Blytonian is the passage that is on today’s date.

 On July 20th 1969, man first set foot on the moon. As Apollo XI spacecraft commander Neil Armstrong stepped out of the landing module, he said, ‘That’s one small step for a man- one giant leap for mankind.’

It’s a strange fact to put in the book, I mean I conveys a sense of adventure but is it in keeping with a Famous Five diary?

Another thing that comes with the diary is that there are a few extracts from the Claude Voilier novels, I can’t seem to find the right page now, but its only half a page worth of the opening passage. I am assuming that because these books are done by Knight, that Chorian didn’t give them publishing rights to print passages in the diary.

It has a nice recipe for ginger beer in the October part of the diary, one of the few different recipes in the diary, though I’m not entirely sure that they are seasonal.

I shall share the recipe for brewing your own ginger beer for those of you who wish to try.

…You will Need:

25g dried yeast

Ground ginger

2 Lemons

About 1kg Sugar

  1. Take 300ml of tepid, 1 teaspoon of sugar and the yeast and mix them thoroughly in a large coffee jar.
  2. Every day for the next 7 days stir in ½ teaspoonful of ground ginger and 1 teaspoonful of sugar. Make sure that you use a wooden spoon for stirring- yeast hates metal! In between stirring, keep your jar upright and still and keep it covered with a piece of kitchen paper.
  3. Next strain the liquid from the solid mass at the bottom of the jar – DO NOT THROW THE SOLID MATERIAL AWAY! Use a nylon sieve for straining, not a metal one. This must be done very thoroughly as no solid matter must get through. You may have to strain it several times.
  4. Into a large saucepan put the juice from the lemons, 900g of sugar and 1 litre of water. Heat gently to dissolve the sugar but do not let the mixture boil. Add it to the strained ginger liquid plus another 2 litres of water.
  5. The ginger beer is now ready for bottling. Pour it into clean bottles and seal them with corks. NEVER USE SCREW TOPS! Pressure can build up inside the bottles and a cork will pop out, but bottles with screw tops can explode. Not only is this dangerous, it will make you very unpopular.
  6. Store the bottles  somewhere dark and cool, like a garden  shed, attic or cellar where nothing will get damaged by whizzing corks. Leave the ginger beer for at least 3 weeks before drinking.
  7. When you want to make some more ginger beer, put just half of the solid yeasty material into a clean jar and start again, adding the sugar and ginger every day for seven days.

 So there is the recipe for the diary’s ginger beer, if you do try it, please let me know how it turns out.

So overall the diary is a nice thing to have, it has the added bonus of not having days and years in it, meaning it can be used for any year. I wouldn’t use it because it’s in a book form, and I was always taught not to write in books

I think  I was lucky to come across it, and for a good cheap price, but I certainly wouldn’t have brought it for any more than two pounds. That is just my opinion, it’s a nice edition to my collection for sure. Do you have one? Do you like yours? Let us know!

 

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

The Secret Island – How has Blyton’s original text fared in a modern edition?

As promised here I am starting a new text comparison, this time of the first book in the Secret Series, The Secret Island. My original copy is a sixth impression from October 1949 (and has an inscription in the front from Christmas 1949 when the book was given to Pamela, by her ‘Uncle Wendy,’ or at least that’s what it looks like!) The paperback is an Award one from 2009.

Starting, as you do, at the very start of the book, the first difference is that there is no end-paper illustration in the paperback, or vignette on the title page. Modern books so rarely have these lovely pictures which is a shame. Also, the Roman numerals have been removed. There are no chapter numbers in the paperback in fact, though all twenty-one chapter titles are unaltered.


CHAPTER ONE: THE BEGINNING OF THE ADVENTURES

The first change, which seems to be quite common is that the double quotation marks for speech are replaced with single ones. I always think double ones are clearer.

For some reason the single line after the first paragraph has been merged into the opening paragraph in the paperback. I can’t really see why.

Very quickly we get into the problem that the original text refers to Nora being slapped. She says Aunt Harriet slapped me six times this morning because I didn’t wash the curtains well enough. Look! This is replaced with yelled at me six times. Look! Originally she then shows Jack her arm, red with slaps. This is changed to her hands which were red and sore from all the washing.

Later when Mike says he hates to see the girls slapped and worked hard, it becomes bullied and worked hard.

And later, another line is drastically altered from Nora got a few more slaps and Peggy was scolded so hard she cried bitterly into her overall, to Nora got shouted at again, and Peggy was in such trouble she cried bitterly for hours. So slaps becomes a shouting-at, that’s expected really, but why has a scolding becomes trouble? And why can’t a girl doing cleaning wear an overall? It could easily have been changed to an apron or dress, why make it a time period instead?

Not all mentions of violence are removed though. In both copies Mike says that his uncle shook me so hard I couldn’t stand up afterwards. Likewise, the phrase no unkind aunt and uncle to slap them appears in both. I’m not sure either of these can be seen as any more acceptable to the editors so I assume they were somehow missed somewhere in the process.

The rest of the changes are quite minor really. The usual hyphenations become one word like to-day, good-bye and to-night, hallo Jack becomes hello Jack, and Granpa becomes Grandpa. I’m sure you can argue many ways that Grandpa is more correct but surely people are allowed to choose their own names for their grandparents? Be it Grandpop, Pop-pop, Paw-paw, Grandad, Granddad, Grandaddy… Granpa is pronounced a little differently from Grandpa and is a different name. Finally, some emphasis and excitement is lost when we must, must, see the secret island becomes just must, must (the second must losing its italics).

One change which may turn out to be a simple error comes when the children are being described. Nora is described as having a head of black curls originally, which matches the illustrations in both books, but in the paperback she is blonde in the text. Peggy also has blonde hair instead of yellow. It will be interesting to see if the hair colour changes back later.


CHAPTER TWO: AN EXCITING DAY

A few more references to slapping are removed. Instead of looking forward to being safe from the slappings and scoldings, it becomes from shouting and unhappiness. Also, Peggy originally says she doesn’t care how much we are slapped or scolded now and this becomes shouted at now. 

A spelling error is corrected too, as Jack in the hardback has them bale out and baling out the water from the boat, this is altered to bail out and bailing out. I admit I did a quick Google just to check, and the difference is explained as bale is correct for bundles of hay for example as it is from an old German word connected with ball. Bailing out is spelled so because it’s from the French for bucket – baille.


Somewhat unusually (in my experience anyway) the paperback has a fair number of illustrations. There is one decent sized one in each of the first two chapters (compared to six small ones in the hardback). Unfortunately, in my opinion, they are fairly poor especially when compared with E.H Davie’s originals. The cover is lovely, as expected as it was by the great illustrator Val Biro (who sadly passed away recently aged 92), but the internal illustrations are by a chap called Dudley Wynne. I’ll take a few photos of them just to show you what I mean.

Wynne’s are much more heavily drawn and shaded and the children (especially Nora) have odd-looking faces. E.H. Davie manages to put much more detail in too. I’ve had a flick through the paperback and the illustrations don’t seem to improve so I will probably share some of the worst in later posts.

Anyway, I make that sixteen changes to the text (if you count all hyphen removal as one). It will be interesting to see if there are as many in later chapters as they will be removed from the slappings and shakings and scoldings then. This updated text doesn’t seem to go as far as some others does in terms of gender equality (at least not yet) as Mike still takes on the burden of making the decision about running away despite the fact Peggy is the oldest. And he sits and wonders if the girls will manage, roughing it on the island without proper beds.

And I will leave it there for this week.

Posted in Updating Blyton's Books | Tagged , , , , | 28 Comments

The Enchanted Wood Review by Laura

[Apologies to everyone, especially Laura as this was meant to go up at 9 this morning. My only excuse is I’m off work so I’ve lost track of the days again – Fiona]

I loved the Faraway Tree series when I was a kid, but I unfortunately lost my own copies a few years ago and the new editions didn’t quite cut it. Then one day my mother-in-law told me she had a set in her garage that belonged to my husband. I happily accepted them and immediately started re-reading them (when I should have been helping with the garage cleanup).

It was so good to read them again that I thought I’d do a few reviews, starting with the first book in the series: The Enchanted Wood. I’ll try to keep the spoilers to a minimum, but you have been warned.

Published in 1939, the book starts with Jo, Bessie and Fanny moving from a town with their parents, as their father has now got a job in the country. The cottage is not far from a wood, which looks ordinary except that the trees are ‘a darker green than usual’ and sound as thought they’re whispering secrets. After finding out that its name is the Enchanted Wood, they naturally have to explore.

On their first trip into the wood, they help out some brownies and find the Faraway Tree. The brownies warn them that it’s dangerous and aren’t happy to find out that the children mean to climb it on their next visit. They try to stop them, but Jo throws an acorn at one, who thinks he’s been shot.

520wide+5161176

Since it’s growing acorns, you’d assume – Bessie did – that it’s an oak tree, but it soon begins to grow chestnuts a bit higher up. That’s one of the many peculiar things about the tree; one minute it’s growing lemons, the next it’s growing cherries or oranges.

Another are the folk living in the tree – there’s the Angry Pixie, who throws soup or ink over people who look in to see him, Mr Whatisname, who can’t remember his own name and doesn’t have a very pleasant temper either, and Dame Washalot, who lives up to her name by doing washing in the tree and emptying her soapy water down through the branches and onto any unsuspecting person climbing the tree.

There’s also Silky, the beautiful golden-haired fairy who becomes friends with the children and introduces them to pop-biscuits – when you bite into them, you find your mouth full of new honey – and of course the aptly-named Moon-Face, who lives right at the top of the tree and owns the famous Slippery-Slip, which is the fun way of getting to the bottom of this huge tree if you don’t feel like climbing down and have some toffee on you. These two appear more than any other character in the tree, apart from someone else who arrives halfway through.

And then, just past Moon-Face’s house, is a ladder leading up into the clouds. When the children climb it – you’d just have to – they find themselves in Roundabout Land, which always spins around to music and only stops in a blue moon.

Like my post (sorry), the book does take a while to get into the actual adventures, but the early chapters help the readers understand who everyone is and what the tree is like. And this is just the first of many adventures, as the girls and Moon-Face travel on the train through the woods to ask the three bears for help when Jo gets caught in the Land of Ice and Snow.

They all visit the land of the Saucepan Man – which results in this funny, deaf little man who wears pots and pans living in the tree, singing his strange songs and taking part in their adventures – and end up at Dame Slap’s school after escaping from the Land of Take-What-You-Want, which just shows that even the nicer lands can be dangerous.

One of the hazards of having strange lands arrive at the top of the tree is that the inhabitants aren’t always pleasant and some may want to visit the Faraway Tree and cause problems. In this case it’s the red goblins, who lock everyone up inside their houses and won’t let them out until they tell them some magic spells. But the help of the whispering trees and the brownies – even though they were scared of the tree – the children and the tree folk manage to trick the goblins and take them prisoner.

There’s always a nice land for the children and their friends to visit at the end of the books and this time it’s the Land of Birthdays. It (luckily) happens to be Bessie’s birthday and their mother agrees, but insists they wear old clothes as their adventures up the tree have damaged some of their good ones by this stage – she has been fairly relaxed about their strange friends coming to visit, so it probably isn’t too much to ask.

Bessie, understandably, isn’t too thrilled about wearing old clothes to her party, but not to worry, there are fancy-dress costumes for everyone once they get there. There’s also games and prizes, a table where the birthday girl can wish for her own food and a wishing cake – which can only be trouble in the hands of the deaf Saucepan Man, leading to another easily solved problem.

These books were probably intended for younger readers, but they still hold up for adults years later – the lands, the characters and the tree itself are so imaginative. The only fault is that some of the ways they escape from lands or solve problems sometimes feel a bit to convenient – what if there hadn’t been a plane in the Land of Take-What-You-Want or if Rocking Land had tilted another way – but I guess that’s so they get to visit more than one land instead of spending the whole book escaping the first.

Dustjacket illustrated by Dorothy M. Wheeler.

Dustjacket illustrated by Dorothy M. Wheeler.

Next time I’ll take a look at the second book, The Magic Faraway Tree.

We also have reviews of this book by Fiona

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Monday

So it’s another week, and the weather seems to be up to all sorts of tricks at the moment. It’s been awfully muggy today but now it seems to have cooled down a bit.

Anyway, we’re back on track with MONDAY posts, because I’m sure you noticed Fiona’s little mishap last week. This week we have Laura with a review of The Enchanted Wood, and Fiona tells me that she’s going to start a new book to do her chapter by chapter changes analysis of, which just leaves me, as always.

Well I might get around to reading the next St Clare’s book, The O’Sullivan Twins, or I have in my possession the Hodder book, The Adventures of George and Timmy so I could review that for you. Or do a recipe or review The Castle of Adventure or another TV episode… so, you might just have to wait and see.

And because I haven’t edited my pictures from the last walk I did, I shall treat you to some ones I don’t think I’ve shared with you from earlier in the year, of Hampton Court.

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Article Review: Rivals Or Allies? Malcolm Saville and Enid Blyton by David Cook

The article is written by a man well known to those at the Enid Blyton Society, David Cook is a well known and liked member by all, but we all know his terrible secret (well, its not that terrible!)…

He also likes Malcolm Saville!

Now, we’re over the shock, and now aware that most of us do like other authors as well, I should explain to you how I’ve come across this article in particular. You won’t find it in the Enid Blyton Society Journal (of which you can subscribe here) but in the Malcolm Saville Society’s journal, Acksherley! (Issue 12, Dated November 1999).

In this article Cook begins by writing about his surprise at being asked by the editor of Acksherley, Jonathan Calder, to write an article comparing Blyton and Saville as Cook notes “whilst he [Calder] is a gread admirer of Malcolm Saville, he is equally vehement in his dislike for Enid Blyton” (pg 23).

So, surprises out of the way, on we go! It’s interesting to read of the similarities between the two authors especially their love of nature. Cook does point out however that they did go about sharing their knowledge in different ways. “While Malcolm was renowned for his ‘sense of place’ in his stories… Enid gave greater botanical emphasis to her stories, mentioning many common plants by name…” (pg 23).  This is something I’ve noticed between the two authors as well: I have immersed myself in Saville’s locations and enjoyed Blyton’s factual nature stories.

Cook briefly compares the religious childhoods of Saville and Blyton, perhaps to show that they had fairly similar backgrounds when they were children. However there is one element of Blyton’s early life that does not match with Saville’s at all, and that would be her father walking out of the family home when she was young, and I believe that Saville certainly had no such drama in his early life.

Blyton eventually trained as a teacher, where as Saville worked for the Oxford University Press, and its around this time that they seem to drift apart in the comparison. Cook goes on to point out that in 1936 Saville was part of the publishing company Newnes, who had started to publish Blyton ten years previously with a book called The Bunnies*. Newnes also asked Blyton to edit the magazine Sunny Stories, which she did, and continued until 1952 when she was succeeded by Saville.

Cook brings attention to the fact that Saville helped Blyton’s first full length novel The Adventures of the Wishing Chair into print, and to quote Cook, “So you see, Malcolm Saville actually kick-started Enid Blyton’s career…”(pg. 24) something I believe we are all thankful for indeed! So you may not actually know who Saville is but you now know that he helped make sure Enid Blyton was such a big household name! Who’d have thought it?

From this astonishing fact we follow Cook as he explored the  two authors publishing habits and similar story lines. In fact it is noted quite clearly that Saville was believed to have become friendly with Blyton and showed her some pictures or described Rye in Sussex, where he based his third Lone Pine Book, The Gay Dolphin, and she may have taken influence from that to write her fourth Famous Five, Five Go to Smuggler’s Top.

A difference noted in Cook’s article is the difference between the writers at their peak in popularity. Blyton was always  a full time writer, unable to take criticism, with six publishers demanding stories for publishing, whereas Saville was very much a part-time writer at the beginning of his career and became a full time one later on.

To conclude, Cook takes us on a summary of the authors’ later lives, remarking on Blyton’s literary inconsistencies and tentatively linking them to the early onset of dementia that finally claimed her when she was 71 on 28th November 1968. Whereas Saville was regarded as being old-fashioned because of the publishers demands to shorten and compress his work, left it without much of the character development and descriptive passages of his earlier work. Saville died aged 81, on the 30th June 1982.

Cook provides us with a comprehensive overview of the two authors that are close to many hearts. I think he does a good job at summing up the careers of Saville and Blyton and picking out similarities, but I feel he didn’t really answer the question in his title – were Blyton and Saville, rivals or allies?

(L-R) Malcolm Saville, Clark Ramsey, publicity manager for George Newnes, Enid Blyton and Richmal Crompton.

(L-R) Malcolm Saville, Clark Ramsey, publicity manager for George Newnes, Enid Blyton and Richmal Crompton.

Well, from what I’ve read and a recent discovery when flicking through my works copy of Blyton’s biography by Barbara Stoney, I spotted a picture of Blyton and Saville, with Richmal Crompton  at a showing of the stage show Noddy in Toyland at the Stoll theatre in 1957, and I would like to believe that they were more friends than rivals. Its possible that Saville was one of the few adults who knew a bit about Blyton.

However I do have my doubts a little as Saville worked for the same publishing company Newnes as Blyton’s first husband, Hugh Pollock, so it is completely possible that Blyton didn’t see or speak to Saville much after her divorce from Pollock if the two men were quite companionable.

In many ways its a hard question to answer without speaking to either of them, but at the same time, I would most definitely like to believe they were allies. What do you think?

*The article doesn’t furnish any other details about this book. There is no Blyton book with that name, but there is The Enid Blyton Book of Bunnies published by Newnes in 1925. It may be that there is a compendium of different authors’ work titled The Bunnies though.

Posted in Other Authors | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Comic Strip Presents… Five Go Mad in Dorset – A Review

I recently discovered that 4 on Demand has all the episodes of the Comic Strip Presents show available to watch, and found myself watching Five Go Mad in Dorset. It was the very first episode of the show made and was originally aired on the second of November, 1982.

Like last time I had a document open and typed up some notes and thoughts as I watched (pausing it frequently so I could make it a bit more coherent.)

On the whole I thought this was a better episode than Five Go to Rehab and I will hopefully be able to explain why as I talk about it.


CERTAINLY STILL A SPOOF, THOUGH NOT OVERLY CRUEL

Aunt Fanny is very made up and full of figure, not the homely scientist’s wife we expect though at least she isn’t played by a man! And Timmy’s a decent sort of dog. The initial banter is all in good fun, Aunt Fanny saying she’s made them a slap up meal and there are plenty of goshes to go around.

Less than a minute in we have Dick say I say Ju, that man looks foreign!, pointing at the porter, and George suggests his name might be Golliwog and they perhaps ought to call the police.

And someone must, because the poor porter is arrested after running all the way to Kirrin Cottage with their cases.

This is an obvious jest at the inherent racism of Blyton’s books. I’m not daft on those sort of “jokes” as they perpetuate the idea that Blyton was an all out racist and she wasn’t. However the joke is played and is over quickly so it doesn’t overshadow the rest of the episode. Later though, Julian spots a car that has no road tax and George asserts it must belong to an illegal immigrant.

Kirrin Cottage is very cute and there’s a nice tea-time scene alongside the porter’s drama. It’s mentioned that Anne’s happy to just be a girl, a little ‘joke’ about Blyton’s misogynistic qualities but it’s just a brief reference again. Funnier are the little things like them having lashings of cream,  and the surprisingly blasé conversation about how Uncle Quentin has been kidnapped.


I didn’t want to spoil your holiday but I’m afraid… your uncle’s been kidnapped again, says Aunt Fanny.

Bad show!  the children groan.

That must be a bit of a blow for you Aunt Fanny, Julian comments casually.

Yes twice in six months? someone else says (I can’t work out who though.)

Yes, well I expect it’ll all sort itself out, Aunt Fanny says calmly.


Uncle Q isn’t kidnapped quite as often as that in the books but far more often than anyone would ever expect to be!

There is an odd subtext though that there’s something going on between Julian and Aunt Fanny though. It’s hard to pin down what it is, something in their facial expressions and the way Aunt Fanny says something about Julian being very mature now. I’m not sure what it’s all about and it’s not referenced again in the episode as far as I could tell (except perhaps at the very end but I can’t explain that without giving it away).


THE CAST

The actors are all much younger (and thinner!) here as it’s more than thirty years earlier, which makes it all more believable and realistic. The Five could easily be in their late teens here.

The Comic Strip cast

The Comic Strip cast


 LASHINGS OF GINGERBEER

Later we get a perfect Famous Five picnic, complete with heaps of tomatoes and lashings of gingerbeer (not lashings and lashings though!) Poking fun at the Five’s ability to fall into trouble, we have some criminal types behaving oddly not ten feet from the picnic rug. They have big noses, thick lips and mean little eyes as well as unshaven cheeks, ergo, they must be up to no good! They’re not exactly quiet either and mention how they’re out of jail and must lie low. The Five automatically assume they are escaped convicts or traitors to the country, as opposed to recently released prisoners. Another cliché is revealed later, as one of the baddies is called Jake. Blyton did have a lot of baddies by that name.

I like their list of food which almost gets chanted at every meal. Hard boiled eggs, bags of salad, heaps of tomatoes and LASHINGS of ginger beer. It’s almost a quote from a book that. Almost.

Perhaps the Five have had just too many adventures as they barely react when the men poison Timmy. Anne casually says Oh look, Timmy’s fallen over, and instead of George’s usual over the top panic she simply says, Oh crikey! in a less excitable manner than the words might convey. She at least sounds a little upset as she goes over to check on him and says He’s been poisoned! Later she very casually asks Do you think someone’s got it in for Timmy?

To which one of the boys, Julian I think, says  Never mind George, we’ll get another.

One quick telephone call later and they’re being congratulated by the police for helping them catch the two criminals red handed. The criminals are none too happy and one calls Julian a little b******! Not Blytonian language at all!


FAMILIAR NAMES AND FACES

Robbie Coltrane appears as the ice cream woman this time, and is very ominous as he talks about Strange comings and goings in this village. Secrets and signs and threats. 

We then run into another familiar face, if you’ve seen Rehab, Toby Thurlow. I mentioned last time how the name is

an amalgamation of names used in the series. Toby is the boy from Five Go to Billycock Hill and Thurlow is actually Richard Kent’s father’s first name.

He wants to join them on their cycling holiday but they aren’t too keen. Sounds a lot like Five Get Into Trouble to me (again). We’ve also got Dirty Dick (Five on a Hike Together) who works for Toby’s dad.


I admit I giggled when they all said look! because a man had parachuted down, and we weren’t allowed to look. Obviously the budget didn’t extend to stunts!

It was around now that my other half made a comment along the lines of

Is it odd that this doesn’t sound any different to the audio books you listen to?

Which I thought was quite appalling! But Dawn French does do a good job as George a lot of the time.

comic-1_1744961c

The Five are also very casual after Toby is kidnapped. (At least they get the right boy this time, unlike in the book!). It’s said it serves him right for being Jewish and nouveau riche. Presumably another dig at Blyton’s attitudes.

I’m not sure about the baddies. They seem a trifle too silly even for this show. They go through their plans and keep adding BLAH BLAH BLAH to the end of every other line, as the boys repeat all the important phrases they can clearly overhear. This does get explained in the end, however.

The names on the map are funny though, Kneecap Hill. Crutchley. Thigh Woods. Ankle on the Water. And we get to see the original Coltrane gypsy scene which they redid in Rehab. Coltrane’s on top form again here. No telephone. No eelecticity. No gas.  No water laid on. Just secrets, and signs and THREATS.

More jokes are made about how predictable the adventures are.

Perhaps there will be a secret way in, just like there has been in our previous adventures! Yes I’m sure this will be no exception!

and

I wouldn’t be surprised if this ladder led up to a little cupboard with a hidden room beyond full of government secrets and strange machinery.

Are two good examples but they’re delivered with such honest enthusiasm it makes them very funny rather than annoying.

The ending was pretty good I thought. I won’t give it away but the boss surprised me, and he got some very funny lines explaining how it all came about.


FINAL THOUGHTS

I think the episode benefited from being thirty minutes instead of an hour, so there were no unnecessary sub plots needed to flesh it out. Some jokes fell flat for me, such as a lot of the scene at the camp where they argued about Toby staying or not, based on the fact that Julian and Dick always shared a tent. A lot of it was very amusing though as you could see exactly why each joke or line had been included. It seems like the writers had a decent knowledge of the books.

So, if you don’t mind a few roll-your-eyes moments as they over-do the casual racism, I recommend this as a fine way to spend half an hour.

Posted in Blyton on Screen | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

The Treasure Hunters by Fred

Is it totally unfair to say that Enid Blyton’s books are fairly interchangeable with each other? Well, yes it is, but that doesn’t stop the majority of her work being thoroughly enjoyable and decent reads in their own right.

Such is the case with The Treasure Hunters, a standalone story published in 1940 that bears the bog-standard Blyton-treasure-plot of a handful of children, John, Jeremy and Susan, setting out to discover lost treasure before their beloved Greylings Manor is sold on to the nasty Mr Potts. Even with its well-tread plot, The Treasure Hunters is still one of the more enjoyable standalone books in Blyton’s bibliography.

First edition dust jacket

First edition dust jacket

The book has some marvellous pacing that keeps the reader interested and rarely lags in its story-telling. The core trio of characters are enjoyable as well – John and Jeremy come across as being two sides of the same coin, but Susan is a hoot. She radiates the strong-willed nature of George with the demure sweetness of Anne.

The supporting cast of adults round off the adventure nicely – Mr Potts constantly popping up unexpectedly as the children hunt for the treasure and the grandparents offering additional tension towards the end when the refuse to let the children complete their hunting.

The scenery depicted throughout the book is another feather in its cap. While Blyton was hardly the most descriptive of writers, the locations she evokes are all wonderfully film-worthy. The woodland, the river, the secret house are all laid out in their bare forms that allow the reader to fully visualize how they might want these places to look.

The plot itself offers enough twists and turns, much like the river the children hunt alongside, to reward multiple readings. As the plot thickens, so to do the locations – the three children, and Rags the dog, continually become entrenched in soggy marshes, brittle woods and claustrophobic underground passages.

The climax is, ultimately, something of an anti-climax. Its not quite as action based as other Blyton books, relying on the children racing back home (or at least the Timble’s farm) before Mr Potts can ruin their adventure. But there’s still some build-up of suspense, which lies in whether or not the grandparents will believe the children’s version of the story or Mr Potts’ version. Having been scolded by their grandparents earlier, it becomes easy for the reader to cast doubt as to whether or not the grandparents will side with the children.

My copy, a 1983 Armada paperback, features some lovely illustrations by Barbara C. Freeman which do much to bring the characters and locations alive. I recall having this copy on my bookshelf for years, but sadly it was one of those Blyton books that I never got round to reading during my initial Blyton phase. I finally gave the book a go last year, and I wasn’t disappointed – the search for the treasure across the winding river is a particular favourite scene of mine, just for the scenery it evokes.

Frontis from later reprints by Barbara C. Freeman

Frontis from later reprints by Barbara C. Freeman

Overall, The Treasure Hunters is a corker of a Blyton book – fabulously paced, strong characters, and an engaging story. Well worth a read!

Armada 1983 edition

Armada 1983 edition

 

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Tuesday is the new Monday

It’s my belief that Tuesday is the new Monday. This could be ascribed to the fact that I forgot to write a Monday post this week until it was too late (ie late Monday afternoon) or it could just be a coincidence.

Our contributor post this week is going to be by Fred, who has reviewed one of Blyton’s stand alone titles: The Treasure Hunters. I plan to write about Five Go Mad in Dorset (an old episode of the comedy programme  The Comic Strip Presents) or if I don’t manage that I may start a new series of text update comparisons or review another Noddy book. And Stef hopes to have a look at an article called Rivals or Allies? Malcolm Saville and Enid Blyton, which sounds very interesting.

I can’t think of any other news from us at the moment so I will leave off with a few photos from my short holiday.

I’ll hopefully be putting up some more of the pictures on our other blog, Two Points of View, later in the week.

Posted in Blog talk | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Enid Blyton’s The Enchanted Village

Welcome to Bekconscot

Welcome to Bekconscot

The Front Cover

The Front Cover

Fiona and I visited Bekonscot last year, to see the scale model village and especially the scale model of Blyton’s house. It was an enchanting little place, except I wasn’t quite as excited by it all as Fiona was! On this visit, we picked up this little book, The Enchanted Village that Blyton wrote during the time she was living in Beaconsfield (from 1938 until her death in 1968.) According to the little note from Gillian Baverstock (Blyton’s elder daughter) in the front cover of the book, Blyton was friendly with Roland Callingham who founded Bekonscot and so she wrote The Enchanted Village.

The Enchanted Village starts with Blyton asking the reader if they would like to accompany her around a village that will make you feel like a giant. Blyton compares it a fairyland, which is quite appropriate, because it feels like that when you step through gateway. Its quite magical seeing all the little buildings, and fascinating at the amount of detail that went  in the little shops is astonishing, there is even a little Marks and Spencers  and a cinema showing ‘Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs’.

Anyway, back to Blyton’s story. She uses the names John and Mary as the children to guide us around Bekonscot with her. They go for a wander through the houses, planted with flowers around the path, exclaiming at the detail, I’ve already described, and how the buildings only come up to their waists.  Blyton remarks on the detail in the church and airport and miniature railway, which will be exciting for those interested in model trains. Blyton makes the world of Bekonscot come alive as she works her magic, making Bekonscot seem like a beautiful bustling little town. She says things like How are the tiny folk of Bekonscot to get about if they have no railway? which in a way makes your imagine the tiny people rushing around when you’re not looking.

The other things that are noted in the book are the manor house, the zoo, the farm, and the seaside village, Little Splashing. These places add to the charm of the village. There’s not much of a story to go with the description, just the use of the children to carry the readers through the walk. Blyton talks about coming back to Bekonscot at a later date, and how wonderful it is for it to  have been created. There is one little extra in the book that is a nice addition, and its on the back back, mentioning the visits by the members of the Royal family to Bekonscot. Royal visits include HRH Queen Elizabeth II, her father King George VI, the Queen Mother, Queen Mary and Princess Margaret. So I think we can safely say that Bekonscot has the royal seal of approval.

DSCN4800

List of royal visitors, with a picture of HRH Queen Elizabeth II and Princess Margaret

On the back page of the little book is a darling picture of Blyton’s house Green Hedges which was torn down after her death. Incidentally behind Bekonscot is Blyton Close, where Green Hedges used to stand.

The Model of Green Hedges on the back cover.

The Model of Green Hedges on the back cover.

 

Blyton Close signpost

Blyton Close signpost

So, I hope you’ve enjoyed my look at The Enchanted Village. If you get a chance to visit Bekonscot, I suggest you do, it’s better if you have children with you, in my humble opinion, though I know Fiona believes otherwise!

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

My sixth Noddy book: Noddy Goes to Sea

My sixth Noddy book should have been #15, Do Look Out, Noddy! which is the next in the series actually, and the one which was mentioned in the Monday post. However, me being the eejit that I am, I grabbed the wrong book on Saturday when I was packing for my holiday. So, my sixth Noddy book shall be #18 Noddy Goes to Sea. (At least I managed to bring one I hadn’t already reviewed, that’s something!)

520wide+6091663

Noddy Goes to Sea was also bought in Alton. It’s ever so slightly less tatty than some of the others I got so it cost a whopping £2.

We are back to Peter Wienk as illustrator (he illustrated You Funny Little Noddy!)


THE STORY

This starts off like several others, with Noddy getting up and getting on with his usual activities and thinking it’s a wonderful day. And, as always, it goes quickly wrong and he manages to get himself in trouble with Mr Plod who seems to always turn up at the worst moment for Noddy. This time it’s because Tubby Bear next door is being naughty and waters his mother’s washing and Noddy’s too. Being a childish toy, Noddy retaliates and ends up soaking the police man, naturally.

IMG_1675

Matters are cleared up much more quickly than usual though, as there was a handy witness in Miss Fluffy cat. Tubby Bear is duly punished – spanked in fact, though I’m sure modern editions will see him scolded instead – and he runs away in the night, off to sea.

Noddy is sent off in his car to try to head him off at the docks, and well, I think I can see where the story is going given the title. So off Noddy goes, stopping only for petrol where he has no choice but to take Bumpy Dog along for the ride. He gets to the jetty just as Tubby Bear’s boat is leaving, and manages to get on before it leaves. Unfortunately, Bumpy-Dog dives in after them and the car follows. Being wooden, the car floats, and Bumpy-Dog can swim, so it’s not a complete disaster though it’s not exactly ideal.

The car gets towed along behind, and Bumpy-Dog is hauled up via a rope, just in time to face the loud-voiced captain who thinks they’re all stow-aways. Tubby Bear signed up to be a deck-hand and gets put to work and Noddy ends up having to be a cabin-boy, though he’s told to STOP NODDING YOUR HEAD AT ME by the captain.

IMG_1676

Noddy makes the best of it, even if he does look queer in his sailor’s outfit. Tubby Bear, on the other hand, is being worked hard and feels rather sick on the ship, so bitterly regrets running away. Bumpy-Dog doesn’t fair too well either as he keeps falling out of Noddy’s hammock and over-board.

IMG_1677

Noddy meets some mermaids, and mermen, who enjoy rides in his car which is still being towed along behind the ship, before they land at Shell Island. Noddy drives the captain around for a while and tells him all about Toyland and his friends there. The captain is quite enamoured at the sound of it and so quite happily takes Noddy, Bumpy-Dog, the car and Tubby Bear back there to be reunited with everyone.


There’s a fair moral running through this – naughty Tubby-Bear certainly learns a lesson or two about behaving. It’s nice to get away from Toy Town too, and I particularly liked he illustrations of the mermaids and Shell Island as these are unlike what we normally see in Noddy books, but they fit perfectly. It’s also nice to see it being someone other than Noddy who gets into trouble and runs away.

IMG_1680

 

 

 

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Secret Seven books at McDonald’s by Su, part 2

Part one of Su’s McDonald’s series is here.

Hurry, Secret Seven, Hurry!

This story comes from Enid Blyton’s Magazine Annual No. 4 first published 1957.  It is a short story and therefore, unlike Secret of the Old Mill, has not been drastically shortened.  There have been a few changes such as baskets become hampers, gate is now lever, Williams becomes Mr Williams, scared becomes worried, buck up is keep going and make haste changes to hurry up.

The main change is that the children no longer open the gates across the railway-crossing; instead they have to gain access to the signal box so that they can use a lever to open the gates.  This causes quite a few changes to the text towards the end of the book although the signal box is still described as a pretty little place with a tiny garden of its own.  It has a garden originally as it is a small cottage where Williams lives, next to the gate.

gate

The line A surprised fireman looked out of the cab at the children on the line below has been completely missed out yet the illustrations depict a steam train and the train still whistles as it comes down the line.

Some of the old fashioned language has been updated such as Is there anyone at home! I say – is there anyone in? has been changed to Is anyone there? Also the more tense tearing down the line has been changed to coming down the line.

Any mention of the three girls being scared or worried or even the three girls listening to the boys talking about football has been changed to others, so as not to single out the girls being the weaker sex.

They have tried to make Peter not sound too pompous by changing the following sentence “No time,” said Peter, looking at his watch.  Then, like a good leader, he made up his mind quickly. to “No time,” said Colin, looking at his watch.  Peter made up his mind quickly. Anything that tones Peter’s mannerisms down is a good thing in my books.

There are one or two changes that I’m not too sure about and they are Peter just skipped to one side in time …  is changed to Peter skipped to one side just in time … Why the change around of the word just, but maybe it flows better the second way?

Everybody has the most enormous ice cream at the end of the book, which version do you prefer?  I think I might choose the modern version, fancy eating ice creams with a shirt and tie on!

The Humbug Adventure

This story that I used for comparison comes from Enid Blyton’s Magazine Annual No. 1, first published 1954. It is no longer morning school but just plain old school now in the newer version but there haven’t been too many changes through this book.  Television is mentioned in the original book and this has been kept the same.  The word jolly is used quite a few times in the story and this has been kept, which surprised me a little, as well as the professor having a maid who shows them into the house.  The names of twins at the fair are still Dickie and Danny and the bad guy’s name is still spelt as the original Jamey.

There are a few small changes sprinkled throughout the book, some of which I can’t understand why they warranted a change.  These are to a different becomes in a different, great tube becomes great long tube, firing becomes setting fire and telephoned to the farm becomes telephoned the farm.

There are more changes when the story reaches the part about the fire at the farm. He gasped and choked, tried to call out something and pointed to the telescope becomes the shorter He gasped and pointed to the telescope.  We obviously must not have children choking on a sweet in a story and this is followed by another sentence being cut. Peter gasped, not taking any notice of poor, choking Jack.  His eye was glued to the big telescope. becomes Peter gasped, his eye glued to the telescope.

In the original the bad man they see through the telescope is described as a tramp but this has been changed to a man. He is initially described as having a limp and a beard and these facts feature later on in the story to form part of his description.  The limp has been cut completely from the new version with the beard only being mentioned once.  This is slightly strange as at the end of the book, when they describe the man as being short, this leads the farmer’s wife to declare Why – that would be Jamey!  They could have at least mentioned the beard to make it sound slightly more believable or are there so very few short men nowadays?

Other small changes are that Buck up, idiot becomes Hurry up. In the original the others call Peter You selfish thing because he won’t let them look into the telescope.  This has been cut out completely, they now just ask for a turn. When they are eating the humbug toffees their speech changes but even this “sweetie speech” has been changed.  Peter says Uthing ooing which is translated as Nothing doing but in the new version it is Uthing oopening that translates as Nothing happening.

There is also a scene when the children are looking through the telescope, where the farmer is observed filling his pipe.  This is kept in both of them but when it is exclaimed that Colin can see what tobacco he is using this is changed to newspaper he’s reading.

Not too many differences but there is a very big difference in the illustrations especially the size of the telescope.  It is nice to see that they still know what a humbug sweet is though.

humbug

Next post: Secret Seven books at Mcdonald’s part 3

 

Posted in Book reviews, Updating Blyton's Books | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment